On r6xx+ a newer fence mechanism was implemented to replace
the old wait_until plus scratch regs setup. A single EOP event
will flush the destination caches, write a fence value, and generate
an interrupt. This is the recommended fence mechanism on r6xx+ asics.
This requires my previous writebac
On Monday, August 30, 2010, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 00:36:36 +0200 (CEST)
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote:
>
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the
> > tracking team
> > kno
p.org/nouveau/linux-2.6.
> johannes
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 229 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20100830/0e0efa5d/attachment.pgp>
On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 21:55 +0200, Francisco Jerez wrote:
> Johannes Berg writes:
>
> > On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 21:33 +0200, Francisco Jerez wrote:
> >> Johannes Berg writes:
> >>
> >> > On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 21:08 +0200, Francisco Jerez wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> > This problem persists in -rc3, wher
- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 229 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20100830/7b890524/attachment.pgp>
On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 21:33 +0200, Francisco Jerez wrote:
> Johannes Berg writes:
>
> > On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 21:08 +0200, Francisco Jerez wrote:
> >
> >> > This problem persists in -rc3, where I'd hoped the nouveau changes would
> >> > actually fix it :-( In fact, it seems I was either "lucky" o
On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 21:08 +0200, Francisco Jerez wrote:
> > This problem persists in -rc3, where I'd hoped the nouveau changes would
> > actually fix it :-( In fact, it seems I was either "lucky" or it was
> > made easier to trigger, this time it already happened during my login.
> That's alrea
t already happened during my login.
>
That's already fixed in the nouveau kernel tree.
> johannes
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 229 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20100830/b7eaa852/attachment.pgp>
On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 15:55 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> Since 2.6.36-rc kernels (both rc1 and rc2) I've had X lockups where X
> sits in a loop just using CPU.
>
> The only kernel message I got this time was this one:
>
> [22290.792075] [drm] nouveau :02:00.0: PFIFO_DMA_PUSHER - Ch 2
>
> st
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29894
--- Comment #4 from Marti 2010-08-30 17:22:30 PDT ---
Indeed, Mesa git fixes it; sorry I was using Mesa git with r600_dri.so from 7.8
before.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving t
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29894
--- Comment #4 from Marti 2010-08-30 17:22:30 PDT ---
Indeed, Mesa git fixes it; sorry I was using Mesa git with r600_dri.so from 7.8
before.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving t
On r6xx+ a newer fence mechanism was implemented to replace
the old wait_until plus scratch regs setup. A single EOP event
will flush the destination caches, write a fence value, and generate
an interrupt. This is the recommended fence mechanism on r6xx+ asics.
This requires my previous writebac
Hi,
I'm trying to track down an apparent memory leak in my Fedora 13 system
that seems to be in the radeon kernel module. I have no proof the bug
is in the radeon driver except that that same sequence will not trigger
the leak on a similar box with using nouveau driver but can be
reproduced on
On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 12:57 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
> > On my laptop which has a 1280x800 display, only the upper left 848x480
> > pixels are used on the console in 2.6.36-rc3. The resolution is
> > correct, but /sys/class/graphics/fb0/m
On 2010-08-30 11:57 +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> On my laptop which has a 1280x800 display, only the upper left 848x480
>> pixels are used on the console in 2.6.36-rc3. ?The resolution is
>> correct, but /sys/class/graphics/fb0/modes looks
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 13:38:27 +0300 (EEST), Meelis Roos wrote:
> Commit 6ef3d4278034982c13df87c4a51e0445f762d316 introduces seq_file
> usage in intel_overlay.c but does not include the header and now
> compilation fails on i386. Fix it by including the necessary header.
>
> Signed-off-by: Meelis
--
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20100830/7cfc4164/attachment.pgp>
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29894
--- Comment #3 from Marti 2010-08-30 14:54:44 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> This is probably vsync related. Does updating to the latest ddx and mesa code
> in git fix the issue?
Ok, I also built xf86-video-ati from git (in addition to dri2
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29894
--- Comment #3 from Marti 2010-08-30 14:54:44 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> This is probably vsync related. Does updating to the latest ddx and mesa code
> in git fix the issue?
Ok, I also built xf86-video-ati from git (in addition to dri2
On Monday, August 30, 2010, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 00:36:36 +0200 (CEST)
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote:
>
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the
> > tracking team
> > kno
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29894
--- Comment #2 from Alex Deucher 2010-08-30 14:17:45 PDT ---
This is probably vsync related. Does updating to the latest ddx and mesa code
in git fix the issue?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
---
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29894
--- Comment #2 from Alex Deucher 2010-08-30 14:17:45 PDT
---
This is probably vsync related. Does updating to the latest ddx and mesa code
in git fix the issue?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29894
--- Comment #1 from Marti 2010-08-30 14:07:35 PDT ---
Also occurs in:
* BZflag
Games tried that do not have this problem:
* glxgears
* Gish
* Nexuiz
* Armagetron Advanced
* OpenTTD
* Lugaru HD
* OpenArena
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.fre
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29894
--- Comment #1 from Marti 2010-08-30 14:07:35 PDT ---
Also occurs in:
* BZflag
Games tried that do not have this problem:
* glxgears
* Gish
* Nexuiz
* Armagetron Advanced
* OpenTTD
* Lugaru HD
* OpenArena
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.fre
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29894
Summary: KMS regression in 2.6.35: Flicker and half-rendered
scenes in SDL games with Radeon RV770
Product: DRI
Version: unspecified
Platform: x86-64 (AMD64)
OS/Version: Linux
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29894
Summary: KMS regression in 2.6.35: Flicker and half-rendered
scenes in SDL games with Radeon RV770
Product: DRI
Version: unspecified
Platform: x86-64 (AMD64)
OS/Version: Linux
On r6xx+ a newer fence mechanism was implemented to replace
the old wait_until plus scratch regs setup. A single EOP event
will flush the destination caches, write a fence value, and generate
an interrupt. This is the recommended fence mechanism on r6xx+ asics.
This requires my previous writebac
Hi,
I'm trying to track down an apparent memory leak in my Fedora 13 system
that seems to be in the radeon kernel module. I have no proof the bug
is in the radeon driver except that that same sequence will not trigger
the leak on a similar box with using nouveau driver but can be
reproduced on
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On my laptop which has a 1280x800 display, only the upper left 848x480
> pixels are used on the console in 2.6.36-rc3. ?The resolution is
> correct, but /sys/class/graphics/fb0/modes looks like this:
>
> U:848x480p-0
>
> This is a regression
On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 21:55 +0200, Francisco Jerez wrote:
> Johannes Berg writes:
>
> > On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 21:33 +0200, Francisco Jerez wrote:
> >> Johannes Berg writes:
> >>
> >> > On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 21:08 +0200, Francisco Jerez wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> > This problem persists in -rc3, wher
Johannes Berg writes:
> On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 21:33 +0200, Francisco Jerez wrote:
>> Johannes Berg writes:
>>
>> > On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 21:08 +0200, Francisco Jerez wrote:
>> >
>> >> > This problem persists in -rc3, where I'd hoped the nouveau changes would
>> >> > actually fix it :-( In fact,
On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 21:33 +0200, Francisco Jerez wrote:
> Johannes Berg writes:
>
> > On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 21:08 +0200, Francisco Jerez wrote:
> >
> >> > This problem persists in -rc3, where I'd hoped the nouveau changes would
> >> > actually fix it :-( In fact, it seems I was either "lucky" o
Johannes Berg writes:
> On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 21:08 +0200, Francisco Jerez wrote:
>
>> > This problem persists in -rc3, where I'd hoped the nouveau changes would
>> > actually fix it :-( In fact, it seems I was either "lucky" or it was
>> > made easier to trigger, this time it already happened du
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28517
--- Comment #31 from Sven Arvidsson 2010-08-30 12:24:37 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #29)
> Created an attachment (id=38306)
View: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=38306
Review: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/review?bug=28517&attach
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28517
--- Comment #31 from Sven Arvidsson 2010-08-30 12:24:37 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #29)
> Created an attachment (id=38306)
View: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=38306
Review: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/review?bug=28517&attach
On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 21:08 +0200, Francisco Jerez wrote:
> > This problem persists in -rc3, where I'd hoped the nouveau changes would
> > actually fix it :-( In fact, it seems I was either "lucky" or it was
> > made easier to trigger, this time it already happened during my login.
> That's alrea
Johannes Berg writes:
> On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 15:55 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
>> Since 2.6.36-rc kernels (both rc1 and rc2) I've had X lockups where X
>> sits in a loop just using CPU.
>>
>> The only kernel message I got this time was this one:
>>
>> [22290.792075] [drm] nouveau :02:00.0:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28517
--- Comment #30 from Pavel Ondračka 2010-08-30 12:01:04 PDT
---
(In reply to comment #29)
> Created an attachment (id=38306)
View: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=38306
Review: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/review?bug=28517&attac
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28517
--- Comment #30 from Pavel Ondra?ka 2010-08-30 12:01:04
PDT ---
(In reply to comment #29)
> Created an attachment (id=38306)
View: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=38306
Review: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/review?bug=28517&attac
On my laptop which has a 1280x800 display, only the upper left 848x480
pixels are used on the console in 2.6.36-rc3. The resolution is
correct, but /sys/class/graphics/fb0/modes looks like this:
U:848x480p-0
This is a regression from 2.6.35. The graphics card according to lspci:
00:02.0 VGA co
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28402
--- Comment #25 from Lukas Schneiderbauer
2010-08-30 11:27:58 PDT ---
I got it.
Since the last kernels were all bad ones, progress was made a bit faster.
#
32b3c2abaf8c61c80a8b02071c73f05252122ffe is the first bad commit
commit 32b3
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28402
--- Comment #25 from Lukas Schneiderbauer
2010-08-30 11:27:58 PDT ---
I got it.
Since the last kernels were all bad ones, progress was made a bit faster.
#
32b3c2abaf8c61c80a8b02071c73f05252122ffe is the first bad commit
commit 32b3
ajax
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20100830/f1a26eea/attachment.pgp>
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28402
--- Comment #24 from Lukas Schneiderbauer
2010-08-30 09:55:56 PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=38314)
--> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=38314)
kernel .config
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 14:07:19 -0700
Kees Cook wrote:
> Fix potential crashes due to use-before-NULL situations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c |3 ++-
> drivers/media/video/em28xx/em28xx-video.c |3 ++-
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+),
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28402
--- Comment #24 from Lukas Schneiderbauer
2010-08-30 09:55:56 PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=38314)
--> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=38314)
kernel .config
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28402
--- Comment #23 from lukas.schneiderba...@gmail.com 2010-08-30 09:38:59 PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=38313)
--> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=38313)
lspci -vvv
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28402
--- Comment #22 from lukas.schneiderba...@gmail.com 2010-08-30 09:38:29 PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=38312)
--> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=38312)
cat /proc/scsi/scsi
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/u
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28402
--- Comment #21 from lukas.schneiderba...@gmail.com 2010-08-30 09:37:24 PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=38311)
--> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=38311)
cat /proc/iomem
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userp
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28402
--- Comment #23 from lukas.schneiderbauer at gmail.com 2010-08-30 09:38:59 PDT
---
Created an attachment (id=38313)
--> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=38313)
lspci -vvv
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userpr
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28402
--- Comment #20 from lukas.schneiderba...@gmail.com 2010-08-30 09:37:01 PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=38310)
--> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=38310)
cat /proc/ioports
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/use
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28402
--- Comment #22 from lukas.schneiderbauer at gmail.com 2010-08-30 09:38:29 PDT
---
Created an attachment (id=38312)
--> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=38312)
cat /proc/scsi/scsi
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.o
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28402
--- Comment #19 from lukas.schneiderba...@gmail.com 2010-08-30 09:36:12 PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=38309)
--> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=38309)
cat /proc/modules
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/use
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28402
--- Comment #21 from lukas.schneiderbauer at gmail.com 2010-08-30 09:37:24 PDT
---
Created an attachment (id=38311)
--> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=38311)
cat /proc/iomem
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/u
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28402
--- Comment #20 from lukas.schneiderbauer at gmail.com 2010-08-30 09:37:01 PDT
---
Created an attachment (id=38310)
--> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=38310)
cat /proc/ioports
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28402
lukas.schneiderba...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #38307|application/octet-stream|text/plain
mime
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28402
--- Comment #19 from lukas.schneiderbauer at gmail.com 2010-08-30 09:36:12 PDT
---
Created an attachment (id=38309)
--> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=38309)
cat /proc/modules
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28402
--- Comment #18 from lukas.schneiderba...@gmail.com 2010-08-30 09:35:28 PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=38308)
--> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=38308)
cat /proc/cpuinfo
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/use
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28402
lukas.schneiderbauer at gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #38307|application/octet-stream|text/plain
m
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28402
--- Comment #18 from lukas.schneiderbauer at gmail.com 2010-08-30 09:35:28 PDT
---
Created an attachment (id=38308)
--> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=38308)
cat /proc/cpuinfo
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28402
--- Comment #17 from lukas.schneiderba...@gmail.com 2010-08-30 09:33:58 PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=38307)
--> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=38307)
cat /proc/version
kernel is from a bisecting git-repo (so ignore the vers
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28402
--- Comment #17 from lukas.schneiderbauer at gmail.com 2010-08-30 09:33:58 PDT
---
Created an attachment (id=38307)
--> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=38307)
cat /proc/version
kernel is from a bisecting git-repo (so ignore the
On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 15:55 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> Since 2.6.36-rc kernels (both rc1 and rc2) I've had X lockups where X
> sits in a loop just using CPU.
>
> The only kernel message I got this time was this one:
>
> [22290.792075] [drm] nouveau :02:00.0: PFIFO_DMA_PUSHER - Ch 2
>
> st
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 14:07:19 -0700
Kees Cook wrote:
> Fix potential crashes due to use-before-NULL situations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c |3 ++-
> drivers/media/video/em28xx/em28xx-video.c |3 ++-
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+),
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28402
--- Comment #16 from lukas.schneiderba...@gmail.com 2010-08-30 09:30:14 PDT ---
Thank you, Da Fox, for pointing me to this thread. I'm "vootey".
I can confirm that issue. The freezes mostly occur, while using firefox.
As Da Fox said, I'm on my w
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28402
--- Comment #16 from lukas.schneiderbauer at gmail.com 2010-08-30 09:30:14 PDT
---
Thank you, Da Fox, for pointing me to this thread. I'm "vootey".
I can confirm that issue. The freezes mostly occur, while using firefox.
As Da Fox said, I'm on
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28517
--- Comment #29 from Tom Stellard 2010-08-30 09:08:21 PDT
---
Created an attachment (id=38306)
View: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=38306
Review: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/review?bug=28517&attachment=38306
Reduce the number
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28517
--- Comment #29 from Tom Stellard 2010-08-30 09:08:21
PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=38306)
View: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=38306
Review: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/review?bug=28517&attachment=38306
Reduce the number
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27744
--- Comment #27 from Alex Deucher 2010-08-30 08:30:11 PDT ---
These look like acpi problems.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee fo
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27744
--- Comment #27 from Alex Deucher 2010-08-30 08:30:11 PDT
---
These look like acpi problems.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee f
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27744
Alex Deucher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #38300|application/octet-stream|text/plain
mime type|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27744
Alex Deucher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #38300|application/octet-stream|text/plain
mime type|
On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 12:57 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
> > On my laptop which has a 1280x800 display, only the upper left 848x480
> > pixels are used on the console in 2.6.36-rc3. The resolution is
> > correct, but /sys/class/graphics/fb0/m
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29787
--- Comment #7 from Alex Deucher 2010-08-30 07:48:29 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> I'm still seeing "invalid EDID" messages, though. Is that expected, or did I
> do
> something wrong? Because I would have expected these messages to disappea
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29787
--- Comment #7 from Alex Deucher 2010-08-30 07:48:29 PDT
---
(In reply to comment #6)
> I'm still seeing "invalid EDID" messages, though. Is that expected, or did I
> do
> something wrong? Because I would have expected these messages to disappe
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29787
--- Comment #6 from Arno Schuring 2010-08-30 07:45:12
PDT ---
problem is still present with the patch but without the command-line option
(since I can't reproduce it at will, it can take some time to verify). I'm now
running -rc3 with the patch
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29787
--- Comment #6 from Arno Schuring 2010-08-30
07:45:12 PDT ---
problem is still present with the patch but without the command-line option
(since I can't reproduce it at will, it can take some time to verify). I'm now
running -rc3 with the patch
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27407
John Bridgman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Drivers/DRI/R600|Drivers/DRI/r300
--- Comment #2 from Joh
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27407
John Bridgman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Drivers/DRI/R600|Drivers/DRI/r300
--- Comment #2 from Joh
From: Jean-Denis Girard
Date: Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 10:40:47PM +
> CC drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.o
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.c: In function
> ?intel_overlay_print_error_state?:
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.c:1467: erreur: implicit declaration
> of function ?
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27744
--- Comment #26 from pete...@hottemptation.org 2010-08-30 07:21:54 PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=38300)
--> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=38300)
dmesg after resuspend with 2.6.36-rc3
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.free
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27744
--- Comment #26 from peterle at hottemptation.org 2010-08-30 07:21:54 PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=38300)
--> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=38300)
dmesg after resuspend with 2.6.36-rc3
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.f
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27744
--- Comment #25 from pete...@hottemptation.org 2010-08-30 07:21:23 PDT ---
I upgraded on 2.6.36-rc3, very confusing!
Instead of "stuck atombios" I got now a massive amount of message from
pm-suspend, also after resuspending I feels like the termin
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27744
--- Comment #25 from peterle at hottemptation.org 2010-08-30 07:21:23 PDT ---
I upgraded on 2.6.36-rc3, very confusing!
Instead of "stuck atombios" I got now a massive amount of message from
pm-suspend, also after resuspending I feels like the ter
On Sat, 2010-08-28 at 22:13 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
> Am Montag, den 23.08.2010, 10:19 -0400 schrieb Adam Jackson:
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c
> > index f1f473e..949326d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes
On 2010-08-30 11:57 +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> On my laptop which has a 1280x800 display, only the upper left 848x480
>> pixels are used on the console in 2.6.36-rc3. The resolution is
>> correct, but /sys/class/graphics/fb0/modes looks
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28402
--- Comment #15 from Da Fox 2010-08-30 05:39:40 PDT
---
I just wanted to point out a thread I just found on the ArchLinux forums which
describes the same issue, with many people reportedly experiencing this
problem:
https://bbs.archlinux.org/vie
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28402
--- Comment #15 from Da Fox 2010-08-30 05:39:40
PDT ---
I just wanted to point out a thread I just found on the ArchLinux forums which
describes the same issue, with many people reportedly experiencing this
problem:
https://bbs.archlinux.org/vie
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On my laptop which has a 1280x800 display, only the upper left 848x480
> pixels are used on the console in 2.6.36-rc3. The resolution is
> correct, but /sys/class/graphics/fb0/modes looks like this:
>
> U:848x480p-0
>
> This is a regression
On my laptop which has a 1280x800 display, only the upper left 848x480
pixels are used on the console in 2.6.36-rc3. The resolution is
correct, but /sys/class/graphics/fb0/modes looks like this:
U:848x480p-0
This is a regression from 2.6.35. The graphics card according to lspci:
00:02.0 VGA co
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29703
--- Comment #2 from Michal Suchanek 2010-08-30 02:13:32
PDT ---
Now there are no more GPU crashes with today's mesa on linux 2.6.36-rc2 + r600
fence patch and the above demos.
copypix segfaults in mesa
dissolve - wrong pattern
fbo_firecube -
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29703
--- Comment #2 from Michal Suchanek 2010-08-30
02:13:32 PDT ---
Now there are no more GPU crashes with today's mesa on linux 2.6.36-rc2 + r600
fence patch and the above demos.
copypix segfaults in mesa
dissolve - wrong pattern
fbo_firecube -
This message contains a list of some post-2.6.34 regressions introduced before
2.6.35, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
If you know of any other unresolved post-2.6.34 regressions, please let us kno
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.35,
for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.35, please let us
know either and we'll add th
94 matches
Mail list logo