https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208825
Alex Deucher (alexdeuc...@gmail.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 10:26:50PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 2020-09-03 21:36, Robin Murphy wrote:
> > Since commit 9495b7e92f71 ("driver core: platform: Initialize dma_parms
> > for platform devices"), struct platform_device already provides a
> > dma_parms structure, so we can save
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208893
--- Comment #19 from Gordon (gor...@gordonite.tech) ---
Never mind I was wrong:
Canvas score - Test 1: 1235 - Test 2: 2115
WebGL score - Test 1: 911 - Test 2: 1005
Total score: 5266
Your results compared to other users
You score better than 97%
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208893
--- Comment #18 from Gordon (gor...@gordonite.tech) ---
With a single display connected and those options still enabled:
Canvas score - Test 1: 901 - Test 2: 2049
WebGL score - Test 1: 903 - Test 2: 1020
Total score: 4873
Your results compared
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208893
--- Comment #17 from Gordon (gor...@gordonite.tech) ---
Update:
- discord is crashing due to OpenGL problems
- Random video output in the bottom right corner of screen bug in driver level
code most likely
- no info about it in dmesg
- benchmarks
Hi,
On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 11:38:09AM +0800, Jason Yan wrote:
> This eliminates the following sparse warning:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-sitronix-st7703.c:156:26: warning: symbol
> 'jh057n00900_panel_desc' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot
> Signed-off-by:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208909
--- Comment #12 from ker...@890.at ---
Created attachment 292495
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=292495=edit
5.8.9 backtrace
Still crashing with 5.8.9
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201957
juan.ze...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||juan.ze...@gmail.com
--- Comment
On 9/13/20 12:51 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
12.09.2020 16:31, Mikko Perttunen пишет:
...
I'm now taking a closer look at this patch and it raises some more
questions, like for example by looking at the "On job timeout, we stop
the channel, NOP all future jobs on the channel using the same
