[Bug 111482] Sapphire Pulse RX 5700 XT power consumption

2019-11-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111482 Martin Peres changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |MOVED Status|NEW

[Bug 111482] Sapphire Pulse RX 5700 XT power consumption

2019-11-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111482 --- Comment #41 from Robert --- (In reply to Shmerl from comment #39) > With kernel 5.4-rc6 I'm now seeing such errors once in 20 minutes or so: > I don't see it that often but I also getting it from time to time. I don't use any patches.

[Bug 111482] Sapphire Pulse RX 5700 XT power consumption

2019-11-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111482 --- Comment #39 from Shmerl --- With kernel 5.4-rc6 I'm now seeing such errors once in 20 minutes or so: [37947.927301] WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 992 at drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn20/dcn20_resource.c:2806

[Bug 111482] Sapphire Pulse RX 5700 XT power consumption

2019-11-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111482 --- Comment #40 from Shmerl --- To correct, it's 5.4-rc6 plus these patches: https://cgit.freedesktop.org/~agd5f/linux/diff/?h=drm-fixes-5.4-2019-11-06=2c409ba81be25516afe05ae27a4a15da01740b01=a99d8080aaf358d5d23581244e5da23b35e340b9 -- You

[Bug 111482] Sapphire Pulse RX 5700 XT power consumption

2019-11-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111482 --- Comment #38 from Andrew Sheldon --- (In reply to Shmerl from comment #37) > If that makes any difference, I enabled adaptive sync for amdgpu, and didn't > revert any commits. Using regular 5.4-rc6 kernel. The fix isn't in 5.4-rcX yet, so

[Bug 111482] Sapphire Pulse RX 5700 XT power consumption

2019-11-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111482 --- Comment #37 from Shmerl --- If that makes any difference, I enabled adaptive sync for amdgpu, and didn't revert any commits. Using regular 5.4-rc6 kernel. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the

[Bug 111482] Sapphire Pulse RX 5700 XT power consumption

2019-11-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111482 --- Comment #36 from Shmerl --- OK, I recorded some data after different steps. Sapphire Pulse RX 5700 XT, LG 27GL85-B (2560x1440, 144 Hz), DisplayPort 1.4 connection enabled in the monitor, DP 1.4 cable used. 1. After normal, boot: auto

[Bug 111482] Sapphire Pulse RX 5700 XT power consumption

2019-11-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111482 --- Comment #35 from Andrew Sheldon --- (In reply to Dieter Nützel from comment #34) > Which I couldn't verify on my Polaris system (with 2 identical HDMI > monitors) currently. > With 'low' and 2 identical HDMI displays I get the below under

[Bug 111482] Sapphire Pulse RX 5700 XT power consumption

2019-11-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111482 --- Comment #34 from Dieter Nützel --- (In reply to Shmerl from comment #33) > (In reply to Dieter Nützel from comment #32) > > > > Hello 'Shmerl', > > > > can you (and the other) please recheck with 'auto', too? > > I think we have the

[Bug 111482] Sapphire Pulse RX 5700 XT power consumption

2019-11-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111482 --- Comment #33 from Shmerl --- (In reply to Dieter Nützel from comment #32) > > Hello 'Shmerl', > > can you (and the other) please recheck with 'auto', too? > I think we have the 'same' problem with Polaris, too. Can you clarify please,

[Bug 111482] Sapphire Pulse RX 5700 XT power consumption

2019-11-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111482 --- Comment #32 from Dieter Nützel --- (In reply to Shmerl from comment #31) > I can confirm, that at 2560x1440 / 144 Hz, after suspend / resume, setting > "high" in /sys/class/drm/card0/device/power_dpm_force_performance_level > stops

[Bug 111482] Sapphire Pulse RX 5700 XT power consumption

2019-11-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111482 --- Comment #31 from Shmerl --- I can confirm, that at 2560x1440 / 144 Hz, after suspend / resume, setting "high" in /sys/class/drm/card0/device/power_dpm_force_performance_level stops flickering that starts after resume, and then setting "low"

[Bug 111482] Sapphire Pulse RX 5700 XT power consumption

2019-11-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111482 --- Comment #30 from Andrew Sheldon --- (In reply to Shmerl from comment #29) > Which one exactly did you set it at? > > I have 2560x1440 / 144 Hz monitor (LG 27GL850) and Sapphire Pulse RX 5700 XT > (hardware switch set to higher performance

[Bug 111482] Sapphire Pulse RX 5700 XT power consumption

2019-10-31 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111482 --- Comment #29 from Shmerl --- (In reply to Andrew Sheldon from comment #27) > A bit of a hacky workaround to 144hz (and multi-monitor issues) on Navi: > > - Bootup to X > - Suspend to ram > - Notice that clocks have dropped (even in

[Bug 111482] Sapphire Pulse RX 5700 XT power consumption

2019-10-26 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111482 --- Comment #28 from Robert --- (In reply to Andrew Sheldon from comment #27) > A bit of a hacky workaround to 144hz (and multi-monitor issues) on Navi: > Thanks Andrew for this hack! That's really a joke. This indeed works with my Navi10 and

[Bug 111482] Sapphire Pulse RX 5700 XT power consumption

2019-10-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111482 --- Comment #27 from Andrew Sheldon --- A bit of a hacky workaround to 144hz (and multi-monitor issues) on Navi: - Bootup to X - Suspend to ram - Notice that clocks have dropped (even in multi-monitor configuration) - I get flickering in the

[Bug 111482] Sapphire Pulse RX 5700 XT power consumption

2019-10-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111482 --- Comment #26 from Andrew Sheldon --- (In reply to Eduardo from comment #25) > I have a PowerColor RedDevil 5700XT and for me, Kernel 5.4-rc1 just works. > Memory clocks always at 100Mhz when idle, even using KDE (Plasma 5.16). > I'm

[Bug 111482] Sapphire Pulse RX 5700 XT power consumption

2019-10-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111482 --- Comment #25 from Eduardo --- I have a PowerColor RedDevil 5700XT and for me, Kernel 5.4-rc1 just works. Memory clocks always at 100Mhz when idle, even using KDE (Plasma 5.16). amdgpu-pci-0a00 Adapter: PCI adapter vddgfx: +0.72 V

[Bug 111482] Sapphire Pulse RX 5700 XT power consumption

2019-10-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111482 --- Comment #24 from Sylvain BERTRAND --- Hi, popping to say it may be the same on southern islands (tahiti xt). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___

[Bug 111482] Sapphire Pulse RX 5700 XT power consumption

2019-10-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111482 --- Comment #23 from Andrew Sheldon --- @Leon I suspect there is more than one bug occurring. The main Navi-specific issue has been fixed with newer kernels (that affected everyone), but there is another issue relating to high resolution and

[Bug 111482] Sapphire Pulse RX 5700 XT power consumption

2019-09-28 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111482 --- Comment #22 from Leon --- (In reply to Andrew Sheldon from comment #20) > (In reply to Leon from comment #19) > > By the way, since I have a x470 mb, it cannot be related to PCI express 4.0. > > It's also not related to dual displays, since

[Bug 111482] Sapphire Pulse RX 5700 XT power consumption

2019-09-28 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111482 --- Comment #21 from Robert --- (In reply to Leon from comment #18) > I have the same problem. Sapphire 5700 XT Nitro, x470 motherboard (asrock > taichi), running arch with kernel 5.3.1. My resolution is 2560x1440 144Hz, > with 30Watts idle and

[Bug 111482] Sapphire Pulse RX 5700 XT power consumption

2019-09-28 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111482 --- Comment #20 from Andrew Sheldon --- (In reply to Leon from comment #19) > By the way, since I have a x470 mb, it cannot be related to PCI express 4.0. > It's also not related to dual displays, since I'm running just one. Not necessarily.

[Bug 111482] Sapphire Pulse RX 5700 XT power consumption

2019-09-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111482 --- Comment #19 from Leon --- By the way, since I have a x470 mb, it cannot be related to PCI express 4.0. It's also not related to dual displays, since I'm running just one. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for

[Bug 111482] Sapphire Pulse RX 5700 XT power consumption

2019-09-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111482 --- Comment #18 from Leon --- I have the same problem. Sapphire 5700 XT Nitro, x470 motherboard (asrock taichi), running arch with kernel 5.3.1. My resolution is 2560x1440 144Hz, with 30Watts idle and 70 Celsius at the memory :( ... Unlike you

[Bug 111482] Sapphire Pulse RX 5700 XT power consumption

2019-09-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111482 --- Comment #17 from Robert --- Thanks Andrew! I played around a little bit with the refresh rates. Between 40-60Hz there is no difference in idle power consumption. The mem clock stays at 875Mhz and can't be changed. The best refresh rate

[Bug 111482] Sapphire Pulse RX 5700 XT power consumption

2019-09-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111482 --- Comment #16 from Andrew Sheldon --- One possibility could be to create a custom modeline, perhaps trying refresh rates between 30-60hz (starting with 45hz), so you can find a point where the high idle power usage kicks in. Reduced blanking

[Bug 111482] Sapphire Pulse RX 5700 XT power consumption

2019-09-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111482 --- Comment #15 from Robert --- Thanks Ilia for your comment! I get this output from "xrandr": """ Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 5120 x 1440, maximum 16384 x 16384 DisplayPort-0 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)

[Bug 111482] Sapphire Pulse RX 5700 XT power consumption

2019-09-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111482 --- Comment #14 from Ilia Mirkin --- (In reply to Robert from comment #12) > At least I now know that I can't do anything further. It just would be cool > if one of the AMD engineers could confirm my assumption that with a > resolution of

[Bug 111482] Sapphire Pulse RX 5700 XT power consumption

2019-09-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111482 --- Comment #13 from Robert --- Ah and regarding the PCIe3/4 thingy: I can't change that in the BIOS. I didn't found any configuration that allows me to change it in general or for the PCIe slot in question. But I guess that's something I don't

[Bug 111482] Sapphire Pulse RX 5700 XT power consumption

2019-09-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111482 --- Comment #12 from Robert --- Andrew, you're my hero ;-) While I'm even more sad now (because I now think that this issue will be indeed never be fixed) I now at least can imagine what's going on. As you recommended I changed resolution to

[Bug 111482] Sapphire Pulse RX 5700 XT power consumption

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111482 --- Comment #11 from Andrew Sheldon --- One more thing to add: some users on Windows have had issues with X470/X570 PCIE4 support. The problem being that Navi advertises PCIE4 support, but doesn't actually support it properly yet, causing weird

[Bug 111482] Sapphire Pulse RX 5700 XT power consumption

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111482 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Sheldon --- >I don't know how to interpret your last comment Yeah, I was a bit unclear. I was just indicating that while I can workaround the issue, it can still be triggered on my system as well. E.g. if I switch

[Bug 111482] Sapphire Pulse RX 5700 XT power consumption

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111482 --- Comment #9 from Robert --- Thanks Andrew, but I guess I don't know how to interpret your last comment ;-) Is there something I can test/change? I can't change the value of "/sys/class/drm/card0/device/pp_dpm_mclk" which is the memclock

[Bug 111482] Sapphire Pulse RX 5700 XT power consumption

2019-09-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111482 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Sheldon --- I just did some more tests, and in my case, it wasn't strictly the refresh rate, but the timings being too aggressive (which I needed to do to lower the pixel clock enough due to driver limits, which are

[Bug 111482] Sapphire Pulse RX 5700 XT power consumption

2019-09-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111482 --- Comment #7 from Robert --- Thanks Andrew for you comment! Sadly that doesn't apply to me. My 49WL95C-W is using 5120x1440 @60 Hz connected via DisplayPort. So refresh rate can't be higher then 60 Hz. The display can't have a bigger refresh

[Bug 111482] Sapphire Pulse RX 5700 XT power consumption

2019-09-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111482 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Sheldon --- Okay, so in my case, it turned out to be a problem with >60hz refresh rates. If I set to 60hz, the problem goes away. sensors: amdgpu-pci-0d00 Adapter: PCI adapter vddgfx: +0.72 V

[Bug 111482] Sapphire Pulse RX 5700 XT power consumption

2019-08-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111482 Robert changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|not set |medium -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 111482] Sapphire Pulse RX 5700 XT power consumption

2019-08-28 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111482 --- Comment #5 from Robert --- One additional observation I made yesterday: If I stop sddm/KDE via "systemctl stop sddm" the frequency has changed after I'm back in console: """ cat /sys/class/drm/card0/device/pp_dpm_mclk 0: 100Mhz 1: 500Mhz

[Bug 111482] Sapphire Pulse RX 5700 XT power consumption

2019-08-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111482 --- Comment #4 from Robert --- I guess it's also not of interest but if I pull the DisplayPort cable and pull it in again I get this error via "dmesg" (this happens every time I do this): """ [Wed Aug 28 00:12:08 2019] [ cut here

[Bug 111482] Sapphire Pulse RX 5700 XT power consumption

2019-08-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111482 --- Comment #3 from Robert --- Thanks Andrew for you comment! At least now I know that I'm not alone ;-) The funny thing is that one of the users in the Archlinux forum thread (https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1860353#p1860353)

[Bug 111482] Sapphire Pulse RX 5700 XT power consumption

2019-08-26 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111482 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Sheldon --- I have the same problem, but with the MSI Evoke 5700 XT. If you read /sys/class/drm/card0/device/pp_dpm_mclk you should find that it's forced to the highest state (3: 875Mhz) and that although it lets you

[Bug 111482] Sapphire Pulse RX 5700 XT power consumption

2019-08-26 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111482 --- Comment #1 from Robert --- Not sure if it's of any use but I figured out today that after starting KDE Plasma, launching "Konsole" and typing "sensors" the output is basically garbage: """ amdgpu-pci-0c00 Adapter: PCI adapter vddgfx:

[Bug 111482] Sapphire Pulse RX 5700 XT power consumption

2019-08-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111482 Bug ID: 111482 Summary: Sapphire Pulse RX 5700 XT power consumption Product: DRI Version: DRI git Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW