https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200387
phoenix (fe...@feldspaten.org) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200387
--- Comment #29 from phoenix (fe...@feldspaten.org) ---
I'm a bit busy at the moment, hope that I will find time on the weekend to
further investigate!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200387
--- Comment #28 from phoenix (fe...@feldspaten.org) ---
Hi Michel, Hi Christian,
that makes sense, I test it on a clean environment. Sorry, that I should have
done that in the first place :-/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200387
--- Comment #27 from Christian König (christian.koe...@amd.com) ---
(In reply to Michel Dänzer from comment #26)
> BTW, ideally you should only test with the kernel's own amdgpu driver, not
> with amdgpu-pro, because the later uses its own copies
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200387
--- Comment #26 from Michel Dänzer (mic...@daenzer.net) ---
(In reply to phoenix from comment #25)
> Ok, I've tested the issue using Kernel 4.15.0-24-generic (Shipped with
> Ubuntu Mate) using the amdgpu driver and a 4.9.111 Kernel using the
>
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200387
--- Comment #25 from phoenix (fe...@feldspaten.org) ---
Created attachment 277153
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=277153=edit
Memor usage measurements for different programs using Kernel 4.9.111 and
4.15.0-24
Ok, I've tested
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200387
--- Comment #24 from phoenix (fe...@feldspaten.org) ---
Hi Michel,
wiredly not, I just double-checked them an in Stardew Valley the 4.4 number is
really the 400 MB bigger one. For now I'm gonna give the kernel version numbers
a try before we're
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200387
--- Comment #23 from Michel Dänzer (mic...@daenzer.net) ---
(In reply to phoenix from comment #22)
>
> ## /proc/$ID/statm for Stardew Valley (Similar problem see the data segment)
> # statm for 4917 on 4.17.3
> 978381 424915 23927 849 0 449695 0
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200387
--- Comment #22 from phoenix (fe...@feldspaten.org) ---
Apperently it's not that easy to attach valgrind to any Steam game, so I'm
going the suggested approach of trying it out using different Kernel version.
Interestingly I could observe
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200387
--- Comment #21 from phoenix (fe...@feldspaten.org) ---
Jep, I'll have a look this evening. Maybe I can reproduce the issue with
another program as well to exclude exclusive problems with a single userland
program.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200387
--- Comment #20 from Michel Dänzer (mic...@daenzer.net) ---
In that case, the output of running the game in
valgrind --leak-check=full
might be interesting.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200387
--- Comment #19 from phoenix (fe...@feldspaten.org) ---
The memory usage goes immediately down once the game quits. No X restart
necessary
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200387
--- Comment #18 from Michel Dänzer (mic...@daenzer.net) ---
Does the memory usage go back down when you quit the game? Or when you restart
X? Or never?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200387
--- Comment #17 from phoenix (fe...@feldspaten.org) ---
Sure, I'm going to investigate through the different kernel versions but that
is gonna take me some time (I have to do this in my spare time)
I'll post my progress and findings, when
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200387
--- Comment #16 from Christian König (christian.koe...@amd.com) ---
(In reply to phoenix from comment #15)
> I hope this is helpful.
Unfortunately not really, the only thing in there is a known issue with the
IOVA cache.
Can you try to bisect
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200387
--- Comment #15 from phoenix (fe...@feldspaten.org) ---
Created attachment 277135
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=277135=edit
kmemleak output of Cities.x64
I was finally able to create a kmemleak output and cropped it to the
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200387
--- Comment #14 from Michel Dänzer (mic...@daenzer.net) ---
Another possibility would be narrowing down where between 4.4 and 4.16 this
started happening, and eventually bisecting.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200387
--- Comment #13 from phoenix (fe...@feldspaten.org) ---
Having some problems setting up kmemleak at the moment. I'll test and check
tomorrow
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200387
--- Comment #12 from phoenix (fe...@feldspaten.org) ---
I'm rebuilding the kernel and checking a possible memory leak with kmemleak.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200387
Christian König (christian.koe...@amd.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200387
--- Comment #10 from phoenix (fe...@feldspaten.org) ---
I uploaded all the requested files. Interestingly the output of top and statm
of the process has comparable values except for the data stack (see file stats)
Virtual, resident and shared
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200387
--- Comment #9 from phoenix (fe...@feldspaten.org) ---
Created attachment 277131
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=277131=edit
Output of top of the problematic process on the two Kernels
Truncated output of top of the
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200387
--- Comment #8 from phoenix (fe...@feldspaten.org) ---
Created attachment 277129
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=277129=edit
Free and stats of the two Kernels
Contains free and the /proc/$ID/stat and /proc/$ID/statm output of
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200387
--- Comment #7 from phoenix (fe...@feldspaten.org) ---
Created attachment 277127
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=277127=edit
Xorg log on 4.4.0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200387
--- Comment #6 from phoenix (fe...@feldspaten.org) ---
Created attachment 277125
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=277125=edit
Xorg Log on 4.17.3
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200387
--- Comment #5 from phoenix (fe...@feldspaten.org) ---
Created attachment 277123
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=277123=edit
dmesg on Kernel 4.4.0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200387
--- Comment #4 from phoenix (fe...@feldspaten.org) ---
Created attachment 277121
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=277121=edit
dmesg Kernel 4.17.3
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200387
--- Comment #3 from phoenix (fe...@feldspaten.org) ---
Yeah, I'll post the mentioned things today after I got home.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200387
--- Comment #2 from Michel Dänzer (mic...@daenzer.net) ---
Also, please attach the output of
free
and of top after pressing shift-M, both captured while RAM usage is high.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200387
Alex Deucher (alexdeuc...@gmail.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
30 matches
Mail list logo
