https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216917
--- Comment #27 from Rainer Fiebig (j...@mailbox.org) ---
(In reply to Alex Deucher from comment #26)
> (In reply to Rainer Fiebig from comment #25)
> > (In reply to Alex Deucher from comment #23)
> > > I'll just revert it. It is more important f
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216917
--- Comment #26 from Alex Deucher (alexdeuc...@gmail.com) ---
(In reply to Rainer Fiebig from comment #25)
> (In reply to Alex Deucher from comment #23)
> > I'll just revert it. It is more important for kernels with the the
> > drm_buddy changes.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216917
--- Comment #25 from Rainer Fiebig (j...@mailbox.org) ---
(In reply to Alex Deucher from comment #23)
> I'll just revert it. It is more important for kernels with the the
> drm_buddy changes.
Would the following be equivalent to what you intende
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216917
--- Comment #24 from Rainer Fiebig (j...@mailbox.org) ---
(In reply to Alex Deucher from comment #23)
> I'll just revert it. It is more important for kernels with the the
> drm_buddy changes.
Right thing to do for now, I guess. If I can find a w
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216917
--- Comment #23 from Alex Deucher (alexdeuc...@gmail.com) ---
I'll just revert it. It is more important for kernels with the the drm_buddy
changes.
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are w
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216917
--- Comment #22 from Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) ---
Thanks for trying.
Another idea that might be feasible to do to identify it is a proper bisect
between v6.0 and v6.1 but manually applying
'306df163069e78160e7a534b892c
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216917
--- Comment #21 from Rainer Fiebig (j...@mailbox.org) ---
(In reply to Mario Limonciello (AMD) from comment #19)
> Assuming it's within amdgpu and not DRM helpers it's still ~800 commits to
> sift through. Even though 6.0.y is EOL now, I think it
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216917
--- Comment #20 from Rainer Fiebig (j...@mailbox.org) ---
(In reply to Mario Limonciello (AMD) from comment #19)
> Assuming it's within amdgpu and not DRM helpers it's still ~800 commits to
> sift through. Even though 6.0.y is EOL now, I think it
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216917
--- Comment #19 from Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) ---
Assuming it's within amdgpu and not DRM helpers it's still ~800 commits to sift
through. Even though 6.0.y is EOL now, I think it would be easier to check the
missing com
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216917
--- Comment #18 from Rainer Fiebig (j...@mailbox.org) ---
(In reply to Alex Deucher from comment #16)
> (In reply to Rainer Fiebig from comment #15)
> > (In reply to Mario Limonciello (AMD) from comment #13)
> > > Can we please confirm it's actual
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216917
--- Comment #17 from Rainer Fiebig (j...@mailbox.org) ---
(In reply to Alex Deucher from comment #16)
> (In reply to Rainer Fiebig from comment #15)
> > (In reply to Mario Limonciello (AMD) from comment #13)
> > > Can we please confirm it's actual
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216917
--- Comment #16 from Alex Deucher (alexdeuc...@gmail.com) ---
(In reply to Rainer Fiebig from comment #15)
> (In reply to Mario Limonciello (AMD) from comment #13)
> > Can we please confirm it's actually broken in 5.15.y before going through
> > t
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216917
--- Comment #15 from Rainer Fiebig (j...@mailbox.org) ---
(In reply to Mario Limonciello (AMD) from comment #13)
> Can we please confirm it's actually broken in 5.15.y before going through
> that effort?
I have tested this with 5.15.87/88. Error
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216917
Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEED
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216917
Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOP
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216917
--- Comment #13 from Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) ---
Can we please confirm it's actually broken in 5.15.y before going through that
effort?
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216917
Rainer Fiebig (j...@mailbox.org) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||j...@mailbox.org
--- C
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216917
--- Comment #11 from The Linux kernel's regression tracker (Thorsten Leemhuis)
(regressi...@leemhuis.info) ---
Just for the record, if someone cares or lands here some time in the future:
There is another report about hibernation problems with r
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216917
Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESO
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216917
--- Comment #10 from kolAflash (kolafl...@kolahilft.de) ---
Looks like the display issue with linux-6.1.y is on a good way.
Hibernation still works fine with the latest revert-commit by Mario & Wayne,
which I tested here.
https://gitlab.freedeskto
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216917
The Linux kernel's regression tracker (Thorsten Leemhuis)
(regressi...@leemhuis.info) changed:
What|Removed |Added
C
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216917
--- Comment #8 from kolAflash (kolafl...@kolahilft.de) ---
(In reply to Alex Deucher from comment #7)
> do you still have the problem with:
> CONFIG_DRM_FBDEV_EMULATION=n
> in your .config?
The problem unfortunately still exists with CONFIG_DRM_F
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216917
--- Comment #7 from Alex Deucher (alexdeuc...@gmail.com) ---
do you still have the problem with:
CONFIG_DRM_FBDEV_EMULATION=n
in your .config?
Does reverting a6250bdb6c4677ee77d699b338e077b900f94c0c fix it?
--
You may reply to this email to add
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216917
--- Comment #6 from kolAflash (kolafl...@kolahilft.de) ---
Created attachment 303585
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=303585&action=edit
6.1.4 dmesg after hibernation
(In reply to Mario Limonciello (AMD) from comment #4)
> [...
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216917
--- Comment #5 from Alex Deucher (alexdeuc...@gmail.com) ---
Can you attach your dmesg output?
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216917
--- Comment #4 from Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) ---
> Perfect guess!
OK.. so we need to find out why this works in 6.1.y and not in 6.0.y. There
are some fairly severe bugs it fixed.
Is it 100% failure rate on 6.0.y?
Si
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216917
Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSI
27 matches
Mail list logo
