https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58521
--- Comment #10 from Guram Savinov 2013-05-20
14:48:17 ---
>>@Guram: what about ACPI? Did you investigate why Linux doesn't export thermal
info from it?
Maybe Asus M50Sa laptop have no hardware ACPI thermal sensors.
If it exist I think
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58521
Rafa? Mi?ecki changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zajec5 at gmail.com
--- Comment #9
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58521
--- Comment #8 from Alex Deucher 2013-05-20
13:59:06 ---
I'd prefer not to. These sort of options tend to be abused. Users and
possibly some distros will start forcing the option on, and then we'll get
swamped with bug reports about
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58521
--- Comment #7 from Guram Savinov 2013-05-20
13:52:21 ---
Ok, but how about comment#4, is it possible?
By default sensor will be initialized as it implemented now, but it will be
possible to override OEM configuration that disable internal
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58521
--- Comment #6 from Alex Deucher 2013-05-20
13:47:01 ---
The OEM designs the thermal solution for the laptop. If they choose not to use
the internal thermal sensor, there is no guarantee that it's calibrated
correctly for their specific
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58521
--- Comment #5 from Guram Savinov 2013-05-20
13:38:48 ---
>>It might produce garbage results depending on the thermal solution from the
OEM.
OEM? I talk about ATI on-chip thermal sensor, it's not OEM, right?
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58521
--- Comment #4 from Guram Savinov 2013-05-20
13:32:03 ---
Is it possible to implement force enabling internal sensor configuration by
conf file?
Because OEM's disable thermal sensor info in AtomBIOS we haven't sensor for
GPU.
--
Configure
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58521
--- Comment #3 from Alex Deucher 2013-05-20
13:22:00 ---
It might produce garbage results depending on the thermal solution from the
OEM.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58521
--- Comment #2 from Guram Savinov 2013-05-20
13:11:13 ---
In this case it will be better to setup internal thermal sensor without
checking AtomBIOS thermal sensor info value, isn't it?
It's no a lot chanses to have acpi sensors support in
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58521
Alex Deucher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alexdeucher at gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58521
Guram Savinov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Radeon ATOM BIOS have wrong |Radeon ATOM BIOS have wrong
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58521
Guram Savinov guram.savi...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Radeon ATOM BIOS have wrong |Radeon ATOM BIOS
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58521
Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58521
--- Comment #2 from Guram Savinov guram.savi...@gmail.com 2013-05-20
13:11:13 ---
In this case it will be better to setup internal thermal sensor without
checking AtomBIOS thermal sensor info value, isn't it?
It's no a lot chanses to have
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58521
--- Comment #3 from Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com 2013-05-20 13:22:00
---
It might produce garbage results depending on the thermal solution from the
OEM.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58521
--- Comment #4 from Guram Savinov guram.savi...@gmail.com 2013-05-20
13:32:03 ---
Is it possible to implement force enabling internal sensor configuration by
conf file?
Because OEM's disable thermal sensor info in AtomBIOS we haven't sensor
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58521
--- Comment #5 from Guram Savinov guram.savi...@gmail.com 2013-05-20
13:38:48 ---
It might produce garbage results depending on the thermal solution from the
OEM.
OEM? I talk about ATI on-chip thermal sensor, it's not OEM, right?
--
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58521
--- Comment #6 from Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com 2013-05-20 13:47:01
---
The OEM designs the thermal solution for the laptop. If they choose not to use
the internal thermal sensor, there is no guarantee that it's calibrated
correctly
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58521
--- Comment #7 from Guram Savinov guram.savi...@gmail.com 2013-05-20
13:52:21 ---
Ok, but how about comment#4, is it possible?
By default sensor will be initialized as it implemented now, but it will be
possible to override OEM
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58521
--- Comment #8 from Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com 2013-05-20 13:59:06
---
I'd prefer not to. These sort of options tend to be abused. Users and
possibly some distros will start forcing the option on, and then we'll get
swamped with
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58521
Rafał Miłecki zaj...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zaj...@gmail.com
---
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58521
--- Comment #10 from Guram Savinov guram.savi...@gmail.com 2013-05-20
14:48:17 ---
@Guram: what about ACPI? Did you investigate why Linux doesn't export thermal
info from it?
Maybe Asus M50Sa laptop have no hardware ACPI thermal sensors.
If
22 matches
Mail list logo
