Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/8] drm/i915: Add more control to wait_for routines

On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 12:57 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > Quoting Chris Wilson (2017-12-01 17:55:15) >> Quoting Sean Paul (2017-12-01 17:48:17) >> > On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 12:44 PM, Chris Wilson >> > wrote: >> > > The current wait_for() is a

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/8] drm/i915: Add more control to wait_for routines

Quoting Chris Wilson (2017-12-01 17:55:15) > Quoting Sean Paul (2017-12-01 17:48:17) > > On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 12:44 PM, Chris Wilson > > wrote: > > > The current wait_for() is a little more complicated nowadays (variable > > > W). > > > > > > > Hmm, am I based off

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/8] drm/i915: Add more control to wait_for routines

Quoting Sean Paul (2017-12-01 17:48:17) > On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 12:44 PM, Chris Wilson > wrote: > > Quoting Sean Paul (2017-12-01 17:20:24) > >> /** > >> - * _wait_for - magic (register) wait macro > >> + * __wait_for - magic wait macro > >> * > >> - * Does the

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/8] drm/i915: Add more control to wait_for routines

On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 12:44 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > Quoting Sean Paul (2017-12-01 17:20:24) >> /** >> - * _wait_for - magic (register) wait macro >> + * __wait_for - magic wait macro >> * >> - * Does the right thing for modeset paths when run under kdgb or similar

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/8] drm/i915: Add more control to wait_for routines

Quoting Sean Paul (2017-12-01 17:20:24) > /** > - * _wait_for - magic (register) wait macro > + * __wait_for - magic wait macro > * > - * Does the right thing for modeset paths when run under kdgb or similar > atomic > - * contexts. Note that it's important that we check the condition again