On Mon, 19 Sep 2016, James Bottomley
wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-09-19 at 08:09 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
>> On Sun, 2016-09-18 at 13:35 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> > Hi! James & Paulo: What's the current status of this?
>>
>> No, the only interaction has been the suggestion below for a
On Mon, 2016-09-19 at 08:09 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-09-18 at 13:35 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> > Hi! James & Paulo: What's the current status of this?
>
> No, the only interaction has been the suggestion below for a revert,
> which didn't fix the problem.
>
> > Was
On Sun, 2016-09-18 at 13:35 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Hi! James & Paulo: What's the current status of this?
No, the only interaction has been the suggestion below for a revert,
which didn't fix the problem.
> Was this issue discussed elsewhere or even fixed in between? Just
> asking,
Hi! James & Paulo: What's the current status of this? Was this issue
discussed elsewhere or even fixed in between? Just asking, because this
issue is on the list of regressions for 4.8. Ciao, Thorsten
On 01.09.2016 00:25, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-08-31 at 21:51 +, Zanoni, Paulo R
Hi
Em Qua, 2016-08-31 Ã s 14:43 -0700, James Bottomley escreveu:
> On Wed, 2016-08-31 at 11:23 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2016-08-26 at 09:10 -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> > >
> > > We seem to have an xrandr regression with skylake now.  What's
> > > happening is that I
On Wed, 2016-08-31 at 21:51 +, Zanoni, Paulo R wrote:
> Hi
>
> Em Qua, 2016-08-31 Ã s 14:43 -0700, James Bottomley escreveu:
> > On Wed, 2016-08-31 at 11:23 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, 2016-08-26 at 09:10 -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > >
> > > > We seem to have an
