[PATCH] dma-buf/fence-array: get signaled state when signaling is disabled

On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 10:43:37PM +0200, Gustavo Padovan wrote: > 2016-09-23 Christian König : > > > Am 23.09.2016 um 13:30 schrieb Gustavo Padovan: > > > 2016-09-22 Christian König : > > > > > > > Am 22.09.2016 um 13:16 schrieb Gustavo Padovan: > > > > > 2016-09-22 Christian König : > > > >

[PATCH] dma-buf/fence-array: get signaled state when signaling is disabled

2016-09-23 Christian König : > Am 23.09.2016 um 13:30 schrieb Gustavo Padovan: > > 2016-09-22 Christian König : > > > > > Am 22.09.2016 um 13:16 schrieb Gustavo Padovan: > > > > 2016-09-22 Christian König : > > > > > > > > > Dropping the rest of the patch, cause that really doesn't make

[PATCH] dma-buf/fence-array: get signaled state when signaling is disabled

Am 23.09.2016 um 13:30 schrieb Gustavo Padovan: > 2016-09-22 Christian König : > >> Am 22.09.2016 um 13:16 schrieb Gustavo Padovan: >>> 2016-09-22 Christian König : >>> Dropping the rest of the patch, cause that really doesn't make sense any more. Am 22.09.2016 um 12:40

[PATCH] dma-buf/fence-array: get signaled state when signaling is disabled

2016-09-22 Christian König : > Am 22.09.2016 um 13:16 schrieb Gustavo Padovan: > > 2016-09-22 Christian König : > > > > > Dropping the rest of the patch, cause that really doesn't make sense any > > > more. > > > > > > Am 22.09.2016 um 12:40 schrieb Gustavo Padovan: > > > > > E.g. for example

[PATCH] dma-buf/fence-array: get signaled state when signaling is disabled

Am 22.09.2016 um 16:11 schrieb Christian König: > Am 22.09.2016 um 13:16 schrieb Gustavo Padovan: >> 2016-09-22 Christian König : >> >>> Dropping the rest of the patch, cause that really doesn't make sense >>> any >>> more. >>> >>> Am 22.09.2016 um 12:40 schrieb Gustavo Padovan: > E.g. for

[PATCH] dma-buf/fence-array: get signaled state when signaling is disabled

Am 22.09.2016 um 13:16 schrieb Gustavo Padovan: > 2016-09-22 Christian König : > >> Dropping the rest of the patch, cause that really doesn't make sense any >> more. >> >> Am 22.09.2016 um 12:40 schrieb Gustavo Padovan: E.g. for example it is illegal to do something like >

[PATCH] dma-buf/fence-array: get signaled state when signaling is disabled

2016-09-22 Christian König : > Dropping the rest of the patch, cause that really doesn't make sense any > more. > > Am 22.09.2016 um 12:40 schrieb Gustavo Padovan: > > > E.g. for example it is illegal to do something like > > > >"while(!fence_is_signaled(f)) sleep();" without enabling signaling

[PATCH] dma-buf/fence-array: get signaled state when signaling is disabled

Dropping the rest of the patch, cause that really doesn't make sense any more. Am 22.09.2016 um 12:40 schrieb Gustavo Padovan: >> E.g. for example it is illegal to do something like >> >"while(!fence_is_signaled(f)) sleep();" without enabling signaling before >> >doing this. >> > >> >Could just

[PATCH] dma-buf/fence-array: get signaled state when signaling is disabled

Hi Christian, 2016-09-21 Christian König : > Am 21.09.2016 um 13:36 schrieb Gustavo Padovan: > > From: Gustavo Padovan > > > > If the fences in the fence_array signal on the fence_array does not have > > signalling enabled num_pending will not be updated accordingly. > > > > So when

[PATCH] dma-buf/fence-array: get signaled state when signaling is disabled

Am 22.09.2016 um 09:44 schrieb Gustavo Padovan: > Hi Christian, > > 2016-09-21 Christian König : > >> Am 21.09.2016 um 13:36 schrieb Gustavo Padovan: >>> From: Gustavo Padovan >>> >>> If the fences in the fence_array signal on the fence_array does not have >>> signalling enabled num_pending will

[PATCH] dma-buf/fence-array: get signaled state when signaling is disabled

On 2016年09月21日 19:36, Gustavo Padovan wrote: > From: Gustavo Padovan > > If the fences in the fence_array signal on the fence_array does not have > signalling enabled num_pending will not be updated accordingly. > > So when signaling is disabled check the signal of every fence with >

[PATCH] dma-buf/fence-array: get signaled state when signaling is disabled

Am 21.09.2016 um 13:36 schrieb Gustavo Padovan: > From: Gustavo Padovan > > If the fences in the fence_array signal on the fence_array does not have > signalling enabled num_pending will not be updated accordingly. > > So when signaling is disabled check the signal of every fence with >

[PATCH] dma-buf/fence-array: get signaled state when signaling is disabled

From: Gustavo Padovan If the fences in the fence_array signal on the fence_array does not have signalling enabled num_pending will not be updated accordingly. So when signaling is disabled check the signal of every fence with fence_is_signaled() and then compare