Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge/tc358775: Fix for dual-link LVDS

2022-01-05 Thread Vinay Simha B N
Robert, What is R-b tag? On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 7:21 PM Robert Foss wrote: > > Jiri: Are you able to test this patch? > > Vinay: Could you supply a R-b tag, if you feel that it is warranted? > > On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 at 09:13, Vinay Simha B N wrote: > > > > Robert, > > I do not have the hardware

Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge/tc358775: Fix for dual-link LVDS

2022-01-05 Thread Vinay Simha B N
Jiri Vanek, Could you please share the part number or datasheet of the dual-link LVDS display used. On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 7:59 PM Jiří Vaněk wrote: > > Actually, this patch is based on testing with a real HW with dual-link LVDS > display (full HD) and it also matches with a datasheet. Without

Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge/tc358775: Fix for dual-link LVDS

2022-01-04 Thread Robert Foss
On Tue, Jan 4, 2022, 17:56 Vinay Simha B N wrote: > Robert, > What is R-b tag? > It looks like this Reviewed-by: Name Lastname Maybe have a quick look at this document. https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.17/process/submitting-patches.html > > On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 7:21 PM Robert Foss

Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge/tc358775: Fix for dual-link LVDS

2022-01-04 Thread Robert Foss
Excellent. Jiri, can you add your Tested-by tag to this patch? On Tue, 4 Jan 2022 at 15:29, Jiří Vaněk wrote: > > Actually, this patch is based on testing with a real HW with dual-link LVDS > display (full HD) and it also matches with a datasheet. Without this fix it > does not work at all. >

Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge/tc358775: Fix for dual-link LVDS

2022-01-04 Thread Jiří Vaněk
Actually, this patch is based on testing with a real HW with dual-link LVDS display (full HD) and it also matches with a datasheet. Without this fix it does not work at all. út 4. 1. 2022 v 14:51 odesílatel Robert Foss napsal: > Jiri: Are you able to test this patch? > > Vinay: Could you supply

Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge/tc358775: Fix for dual-link LVDS

2022-01-04 Thread Robert Foss
Jiri: Are you able to test this patch? Vinay: Could you supply a R-b tag, if you feel that it is warranted? On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 at 09:13, Vinay Simha B N wrote: > > Robert, > I do not have the hardware to test this feature. Sorry for the late response. > > On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 8:20 PM Robert

Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge/tc358775: Fix for dual-link LVDS

2021-12-14 Thread Vinay Simha B N
Robert, I do not have the hardware to test this feature. Sorry for the late response. On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 8:20 PM Robert Foss wrote: > + Zhen & Vinay > > This patch looks good in itself, but I would like to see a tested by > tag. At the very least testing for regression in single-link LVDS

Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge/tc358775: Fix for dual-link LVDS

2021-11-18 Thread Robert Foss
+ Zhen & Vinay This patch looks good in itself, but I would like to see a tested by tag. At the very least testing for regression in single-link LVDS but ideally some third party verification of this patch. On Wed, 10 Nov 2021 at 23:01, Jiri Vanek wrote: > > Fixed wrong register shift for

[PATCH] drm/bridge/tc358775: Fix for dual-link LVDS

2021-11-10 Thread Jiri Vanek
Fixed wrong register shift for single/dual link LVDS output. Signed-off-by: Jiri Vanek --- drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/tc358775.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/tc358775.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/tc358775.c index