Unlock missing on failure of the new call to idr_remove.
julia
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 15:14:54 +0800
From: kbuild test robot
To: kbu...@01.org
Cc: Julia Lawall
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/gem: use new idr deletion interface to cleanup
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:20:47AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 12:17:28AM +0530, Aishwarya Pant wrote:
> > The IDR deletion interface now returns the deleted entry or NULL if it was
> > not
> > present. So we don't have to do the extra work of checking if we have a
> > re
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:12:12AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Aishwarya Pant (2017-09-25 19:47:28)
> > The IDR deletion interface now returns the deleted entry or NULL if it was
> > not
> > present. So we don't have to do the extra work of checking if we have a
> > reference on the drm_g
On Tue, 26 Sep 2017, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, 26 Sep 2017, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 12:17:28AM +0530, Aishwarya Pant wrote:
> >>>
Quoting Aishwarya Pant (2017-09-25 19:47:28)
> The IDR deletion interface now returns the deleted entry or NULL if it was not
> present. So we don't have to do the extra work of checking if we have a
> reference on the drm_gem_object, this can be handled by checking the return
> value from idr_remo
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Julia Lawall wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 26 Sep 2017, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 12:17:28AM +0530, Aishwarya Pant wrote:
>>> > The IDR deletion interface now returns the deleted entry o
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 26 Sep 2017, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 12:17:28AM +0530, Aishwarya Pant wrote:
>> > The IDR deletion interface now returns the deleted entry or NULL if it was
>> > not
>> > present. So we don't have to do
On Tue, 26 Sep 2017, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 12:17:28AM +0530, Aishwarya Pant wrote:
> > The IDR deletion interface now returns the deleted entry or NULL if it was
> > not
> > present. So we don't have to do the extra work of checking if we have a
> > reference on the drm
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 12:17:28AM +0530, Aishwarya Pant wrote:
> The IDR deletion interface now returns the deleted entry or NULL if it was not
> present. So we don't have to do the extra work of checking if we have a
> reference on the drm_gem_object, this can be handled by checking the return
>
The IDR deletion interface now returns the deleted entry or NULL if it was not
present. So we don't have to do the extra work of checking if we have a
reference on the drm_gem_object, this can be handled by checking the return
value from idr_remove() and the extra locks can be dropped.
Signed-off-
10 matches
Mail list logo