On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 08:49:37AM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 08:39:43PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > When performing driver testing, one factor we want to test is how we
> > handle a foreign fence that is never signaled. We can wait on that fence
> > indefinitely, in wh
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 10:40:02AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 08:49:37AM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 08:39:43PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > When performing driver testing, one factor we want to test is how we
> > > handle a foreign fence th
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 08:39:43PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> When performing driver testing, one factor we want to test is how we
> handle a foreign fence that is never signaled. We can wait on that fence
> indefinitely, in which case the driver appears hung, or we can take some
> remedial actio
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 04:28:40PM -0700, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> Why is this useful if only root can use it?
> > When performing driver testing, one factor we want to test is how we
> > handle a foreign fence that is never signaled. We can wait on that fence
> > indefinitely, in which case th
When performing driver testing, one factor we want to test is how we
handle a foreign fence that is never signaled. We can wait on that fence
indefinitely, in which case the driver appears hung, or we can take some
remedial action (with risks regarding the state of any shared content).
Whatever the
Why is this useful if only root can use it?
Kristian
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Chris Wilson
wrote:
> When performing driver testing, one factor we want to test is how we
> handle a foreign fence that is never signaled. We can wait on that fence
> indefinitely, in which case the driver a
