Re: Re: [PATCH] drm/xe: skip building debugfs code for CONFIG_DEBUG_FS=n

On Wed, 21 Feb 2024, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > Looking at drm-intel and drm-misc, they are using a special > for-linux-next. We may eventually adopt the same workflow, but I will > have to check with other maintainers. The idea is to try to better reflect what's actually going to next. For example

Re: [PATCH] drm/xe: skip building debugfs code for CONFIG_DEBUG_FS=n

Hi Lucas, On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 13:45:35 -0600 Lucas De Marchi wrote: > > I don't think it's needed since drm-xe-next covers what is in > drm-xe-fixes. Please add other maintainers and mailing list: > > M: Oded Gabbay > M: Thomas Hellström > L: intel...@lists.freedesktop.org Add

Re: Re: [PATCH] drm/xe: skip building debugfs code for CONFIG_DEBUG_FS=n

On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 05:21:17PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi Lucas, On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 23:29:54 -0600 Lucas De Marchi wrote: Looking at https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=2d5c7b7eb345249cb34d42cbc2b97b4c57ea944e it seems we still don't ha

Re: [PATCH] drm/xe: skip building debugfs code for CONFIG_DEBUG_FS=n

Hi Lucas, On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 23:29:54 -0600 Lucas De Marchi wrote: > > Looking at > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=2d5c7b7eb345249cb34d42cbc2b97b4c57ea944e > it seems we still don't have drm-xe-next branch in linux-next. > > Stephen, could you

Re: Re: [PATCH] drm/xe: skip building debugfs code for CONFIG_DEBUG_FS=n

+Stephen On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 03:58:54PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Tue, Feb 13, 2024, at 15:55, Jani Nikula wrote: On Tue, 13 Feb 2024, Arnd Bergmann wrote: From: Arnd Bergmann Some of the debugfs functions are stubbed out in these configurations, so trying to build the .c file with

Re: [PATCH] drm/xe: skip building debugfs code for CONFIG_DEBUG_FS=n

On Tue, Feb 13, 2024, at 15:55, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Tue, 13 Feb 2024, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> From: Arnd Bergmann >> >> Some of the debugfs functions are stubbed out in these configurations, >> so trying to build the .c file with the definition fails: >> >> In file included from include/uapi/

Re: [PATCH] drm/xe: skip building debugfs code for CONFIG_DEBUG_FS=n

On Tue, 13 Feb 2024, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > From: Arnd Bergmann > > Some of the debugfs functions are stubbed out in these configurations, > so trying to build the .c file with the definition fails: > > In file included from include/uapi/linux/posix_types.h:5, > from drivers/gpu/

[PATCH] drm/xe: skip building debugfs code for CONFIG_DEBUG_FS=n

From: Arnd Bergmann Some of the debugfs functions are stubbed out in these configurations, so trying to build the .c file with the definition fails: In file included from include/uapi/linux/posix_types.h:5, from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pipe_crc.c:27: drivers/gpu/drm/i