On Fri, 04 Oct 2019, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 06:15:11AM -0700, Michel Lespinasse wrote:
My take is that this (Davidlohr's) patch series does not necessarily
need to be applied all at once - we could get the first change in
(adding the interval_tree_gen.h header), and
On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 06:15:11AM -0700, Michel Lespinasse wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 5:26 PM Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > Hurm, this is not entirely accurate. Most users do actually want
> > overlapping and multiple ranges. I just studied this extensively:
>
> (Just curious,
On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 06:15:11AM -0700, Michel Lespinasse wrote:
> My take is that this (Davidlohr's) patch series does not necessarily
> need to be applied all at once - we could get the first change in
> (adding the interval_tree_gen.h header), and convert the first few
> users, without
Hi Jason,
On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 5:26 PM Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> Hurm, this is not entirely accurate. Most users do actually want
> overlapping and multiple ranges. I just studied this extensively:
(Just curious, are you the person we discussed this with after the
Maple Tree talk at LPC 2019
On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 01:32:50PM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 01:18:47PM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> > It has been discussed[1,2] that almost all users of interval trees would
> > better
> > be served if the intervals were actually not [a,b], but instead [a, b).
On Thu, 03 Oct 2019, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 01:18:47PM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
Hi,
It has been discussed[1,2] that almost all users of interval trees would better
be served if the intervals were actually not [a,b], but instead [a, b). This
series attempts to
On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 01:18:47PM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It has been discussed[1,2] that almost all users of interval trees would
> better
> be served if the intervals were actually not [a,b], but instead [a, b). This
> series attempts to convert all callers by way of
On Thu, 03 Oct 2019, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 01:18:47PM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
It has been discussed[1,2] that almost all users of interval trees would better
be served if the intervals were actually not [a,b], but instead [a, b). This
So how does a user
On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 01:18:47PM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> It has been discussed[1,2] that almost all users of interval trees would
> better
> be served if the intervals were actually not [a,b], but instead [a, b). This
So how does a user represent a range from ULONG_MAX to ULONG_MAX
Hi,
It has been discussed[1,2] that almost all users of interval trees would better
be served if the intervals were actually not [a,b], but instead [a, b). This
series attempts to convert all callers by way of transitioning from using
"interval_tree_generic.h" to "interval_tree_gen.h". Once all
10 matches
Mail list logo
