On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 01:35:58PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 11:32:32PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I wanted to take another look at struct_mutex usage in modern (gem) drivers
> > and
> > noticed that for a fair lot we're very to be completely
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 12:53:23PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 01:35:58PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 11:32:32PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I wanted to take another look at struct_mutex usage in modern (gem)
> > >
On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 11:32:32PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I wanted to take another look at struct_mutex usage in modern (gem) drivers
> and
> noticed that for a fair lot we're very to be completely struct_mutex free.
>
> This pile here is the the simple part, which mostly
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 01:35:58PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 11:32:32PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I wanted to take another look at struct_mutex usage in modern (gem) drivers
> > and
> > noticed that for a fair lot we're very to be completely
Hi all,
I wanted to take another look at struct_mutex usage in modern (gem) drivers and
noticed that for a fair lot we're very to be completely struct_mutex free.
This pile here is the the simple part, which mostly just removes code and
mutex_lock/unlock calls. All the patches here are
