On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 10:03:49AM -0800, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 05:12:10PM -0800, Matt Roper wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 04:57:08PM -0800, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> > > Register 0x9424 is not replicated on any platform, so it shouldn't be
> > > declared with REG_MCR
On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 05:12:10PM -0800, Matt Roper wrote:
On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 04:57:08PM -0800, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
Register 0x9424 is not replicated on any platform, so it shouldn't be
declared with REG_MCR(). Declaring it with _MMIO() is basically
duplicate of the GEN7 version, so jus
On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 04:57:08PM -0800, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> Register 0x9424 is not replicated on any platform, so it shouldn't be
> declared with REG_MCR(). Declaring it with _MMIO() is basically
> duplicate of the GEN7 version, so just remove the GEN8 and change all
> the callers to use the
Register 0x9424 is not replicated on any platform, so it shouldn't be
declared with REG_MCR(). Declaring it with _MMIO() is basically
duplicate of the GEN7 version, so just remove the GEN8 and change all
the callers to use the right functions.
Also use intel_uncore_rmw() rather than a read + write
