On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 5:34 AM, Keith Packard wrote:
> Doesn't make sense to disable in the other order.
>
> Signed-off-by: Keith Packard
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 10 +-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
I can't see anything in the docs about an
"Lespiau, Damien" writes:
> I can't see anything in the docs about an order requirement for those.
Right, the docs don't say anything, which is a bit disconcerting.
> Not sure why the other way does not make sense. Somehow disabling TX
> before RX makes some sense to me (TX enabled without a
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 5:34 AM, Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com wrote:
Doesn't make sense to disable in the other order.
Signed-off-by: Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 10 +-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
I can't see
Lespiau, Damien damien.lesp...@intel.com writes:
I can't see anything in the docs about an order requirement for those.
Right, the docs don't say anything, which is a bit disconcerting.
Not sure why the other way does not make sense. Somehow disabling TX
before RX makes some sense to me (TX
Doesn't make sense to disable in the other order.
Signed-off-by: Keith Packard
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 10 +-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index
Doesn't make sense to disable in the other order.
Signed-off-by: Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 10 +-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
