On Thu, 02 Jun 2022, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 01:39:23PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> Add drm_edid based block count and data access helper functions that
>> take the EDID allocated size into account.
>>
>> At the moment, the allocated size should always match the EDID size
On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 01:39:23PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Add drm_edid based block count and data access helper functions that
> take the EDID allocated size into account.
>
> At the moment, the allocated size should always match the EDID size
> indicated by the extension count, but this will
On Tue, 24 May 2022, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> On 24.05.2022 12:39, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> Add drm_edid based block count and data access helper functions that
>> take the EDID allocated size into account.
>>
>> At the moment, the allocated size should always match the EDID size
>> indicated by the e
On 24.05.2022 12:39, Jani Nikula wrote:
Add drm_edid based block count and data access helper functions that
take the EDID allocated size into account.
At the moment, the allocated size should always match the EDID size
indicated by the extension count, but this will change in the future.
Signe
Add drm_edid based block count and data access helper functions that
take the EDID allocated size into account.
At the moment, the allocated size should always match the EDID size
indicated by the extension count, but this will change in the future.
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula
---
drivers/gpu/dr
