2017년 01월 23일 23:55에 Sean Paul 이(가) 쓴 글:
>
>
> As of now, I don't see any case. even without Maarten's patch set, it
> works well - actually, I had a test with atomic test app more than 10
> hours..
Can you provide this test application? In particular I'm asking this
beca
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 11:20:42AM -0500, Sean Paul wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 05:01:56PM +0100, Tobias Jakobi wrote:
> > Sean Paul wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > As of now, I don't see any case. even without Maarten's patch set, it
> > > works well - actually, I had a test with atomic t
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 05:01:56PM +0100, Tobias Jakobi wrote:
> Sean Paul wrote:
> >
> >
> > As of now, I don't see any case. even without Maarten's patch set, it
> > works well - actually, I had a test with atomic test app more than 10
> > hours..
> Can you provide this test
Sean Paul wrote:
>
>
> As of now, I don't see any case. even without Maarten's patch set, it
> works well - actually, I had a test with atomic test app more than 10
> hours..
Can you provide this test application? In particular I'm asking this
because libdrm currently does
> >>> As of now, I don't see any case. even without Maarten's patch set, it
> >>> works well - actually, I had a test with atomic test app more than 10
> >>> hours..
> >> Can you provide this test application? In particular I'm asking this
> >> because libdrm currently doesn't provide any tests
Inki Dae wrote:
>
>
> 2017년 01월 20일 22:05에 Tobias Jakobi 이(가) 쓴 글:
>> Inki Dae wrote:
>>> Hi Tobias,
>>>
>>> 2017년 01월 19일 21:49에 Tobias Jakobi 이(가) 쓴 글:
What about Laurent's comment stating that drm_atomic_helper_commit() is
broken at the moment? Shouldn't there be some kind of warning
2017년 01월 20일 22:05에 Tobias Jakobi 이(가) 쓴 글:
> Inki Dae wrote:
>> Hi Tobias,
>>
>> 2017년 01월 19일 21:49에 Tobias Jakobi 이(가) 쓴 글:
>>> What about Laurent's comment stating that drm_atomic_helper_commit() is
>>> broken at the moment? Shouldn't there be some kind of warning in the
>>> commit message t
Inki Dae wrote:
> Hi Tobias,
>
> 2017년 01월 19일 21:49에 Tobias Jakobi 이(가) 쓴 글:
>> What about Laurent's comment stating that drm_atomic_helper_commit() is
>> broken at the moment? Shouldn't there be some kind of warning in the
>> commit message that this patch is only safe to apply once the fixes fo
Hi Tobias,
2017년 01월 19일 21:49에 Tobias Jakobi 이(가) 쓴 글:
> What about Laurent's comment stating that drm_atomic_helper_commit() is
> broken at the moment? Shouldn't there be some kind of warning in the
> commit message that this patch is only safe to apply once the fixes for
> drm_atomic_helper_com
2017년 01월 19일 20:53에 Gustavo Padovan 이(가) 쓴 글:
> Hi Inki,
>
> 2017-01-19 Inki Dae :
>
>> This patch replaces specific atomic commit function
>> with atomic helper commit one.
>>
>> For this, it removes existing atomic commit function
>> and relevant code specific to Exynos DRM and makes
>> atom
What about Laurent's comment stating that drm_atomic_helper_commit() is
broken at the moment? Shouldn't there be some kind of warning in the
commit message that this patch is only safe to apply once the fixes for
drm_atomic_helper_commit() have landed? I'm already seeing this getting
merged by acci
Hi Inki,
2017-01-19 Inki Dae :
> This patch replaces specific atomic commit function
> with atomic helper commit one.
>
> For this, it removes existing atomic commit function
> and relevant code specific to Exynos DRM and makes
> atomic helper commit to be used instead.
>
> Below are changes fo
This patch replaces specific atomic commit function
with atomic helper commit one.
For this, it removes existing atomic commit function
and relevant code specific to Exynos DRM and makes
atomic helper commit to be used instead.
Below are changes for the use of atomic helper commit:
- add atomic_c
13 matches
Mail list logo
