On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 05:24:29PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Ville Syrjälä (2017-10-09 17:18:17)
> > On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 08:19:12PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > Quoting ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com (2016-04-01 19:48:50)
> > > > From: Ville Syrjälä
Quoting Ville Syrjälä (2017-10-09 17:18:17)
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 08:19:12PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Quoting ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com (2016-04-01 19:48:50)
> > > From: Ville Syrjälä
> > >
> > > Eliminate the duplicate code for pipe timing readout in
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 08:19:12PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com (2016-04-01 19:48:50)
> > From: Ville Syrjälä
> >
> > Eliminate the duplicate code for pipe timing readout in
> > intel_crtc_mode_get() by using the functions we
Quoting ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com (2016-04-01 19:48:50)
> From: Ville Syrjälä
>
> Eliminate the duplicate code for pipe timing readout in
> intel_crtc_mode_get() by using the functions we use for the normal state
> readout.
>
> v2: Store dotclock in
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 09:48:50PM +0300, ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä
>
> Eliminate the duplicate code for pipe timing readout in
> intel_crtc_mode_get() by using the functions we use for the normal state
> readout.
I also forgot to point out here that this
From: Ville Syrjälä
Eliminate the duplicate code for pipe timing readout in
intel_crtc_mode_get() by using the functions we use for the normal state
readout.
v2: Store dotclock in adjusted_mode instead of the final mode
Cc: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org