On 2021-12-03 at 17:31:11 +, Matthew Auld wrote:
> On 03/12/2021 16:59, Ramalingam C wrote:
> > On 2021-12-03 at 12:24:20 +, Matthew Auld wrote:
> > > If this is LMEM then we get a 32 entry PT, with each PTE pointing to
> > > some 64K block of memory, otherwise it's just the usual 512
On 03/12/2021 16:59, Ramalingam C wrote:
On 2021-12-03 at 12:24:20 +, Matthew Auld wrote:
If this is LMEM then we get a 32 entry PT, with each PTE pointing to
some 64K block of memory, otherwise it's just the usual 512 entry PT.
This very much assumes the caller knows what they are doing.
On 2021-12-03 at 12:24:20 +, Matthew Auld wrote:
> If this is LMEM then we get a 32 entry PT, with each PTE pointing to
> some 64K block of memory, otherwise it's just the usual 512 entry PT.
> This very much assumes the caller knows what they are doing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld
> Cc:
If this is LMEM then we get a 32 entry PT, with each PTE pointing to
some 64K block of memory, otherwise it's just the usual 512 entry PT.
This very much assumes the caller knows what they are doing.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld
Cc: Thomas Hellström
Cc: Ramalingam C
---
