Hi Heiko,
On Monday, 4 December 2017 15:46:32 EET Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> Am Montag, 4. Dezember 2017, 15:22:07 CET schrieb Laurent Pinchart:
> > On Wednesday, 29 November 2017 20:47:55 EET Brian Norris wrote:
> > > From: Nickey Yang
> > >
> > > We might include
Hi Laurent,
Am Montag, 4. Dezember 2017, 15:22:07 CET schrieb Laurent Pinchart:
> On Wednesday, 29 November 2017 20:47:55 EET Brian Norris wrote:
> > From: Nickey Yang
> >
> > We might include additional ports in derivative device trees, so the
> > 'port' node should
Hi Nickey,
Thank you for the patch.
On Wednesday, 29 November 2017 20:47:55 EET Brian Norris wrote:
> From: Nickey Yang
>
> We might include additional ports in derivative device trees, so the
> 'port' node should have an address, and the parent 'ports' node needs
>
Am Mittwoch, 29. November 2017, 10:47:55 CET schrieb Brian Norris:
> From: Nickey Yang
>
> We might include additional ports in derivative device trees, so the
> 'port' node should have an address, and the parent 'ports' node needs
> /#{addres,size}-cells.
>
> v4:
>
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Brian Norris wrote:
> From: Nickey Yang
>
> We might include additional ports in derivative device trees, so the
> 'port' node should have an address, and the parent 'ports' node needs
>
From: Nickey Yang
We might include additional ports in derivative device trees, so the
'port' node should have an address, and the parent 'ports' node needs
/#{addres,size}-cells.
v4:
* keep #{address,size}-cells in both 'ports' and 'port@0' nodes
* separate from