Re: [PATCH v4] arm64: dts: rockchip: update mipi cells for RK3399

2017-12-04 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Heiko, On Monday, 4 December 2017 15:46:32 EET Heiko Stuebner wrote: > Am Montag, 4. Dezember 2017, 15:22:07 CET schrieb Laurent Pinchart: > > On Wednesday, 29 November 2017 20:47:55 EET Brian Norris wrote: > > > From: Nickey Yang > > > > > > We might include

Re: [PATCH v4] arm64: dts: rockchip: update mipi cells for RK3399

2017-12-04 Thread Heiko Stuebner
Hi Laurent, Am Montag, 4. Dezember 2017, 15:22:07 CET schrieb Laurent Pinchart: > On Wednesday, 29 November 2017 20:47:55 EET Brian Norris wrote: > > From: Nickey Yang > > > > We might include additional ports in derivative device trees, so the > > 'port' node should

Re: [PATCH v4] arm64: dts: rockchip: update mipi cells for RK3399

2017-12-04 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Nickey, Thank you for the patch. On Wednesday, 29 November 2017 20:47:55 EET Brian Norris wrote: > From: Nickey Yang > > We might include additional ports in derivative device trees, so the > 'port' node should have an address, and the parent 'ports' node needs >

Re: [PATCH v4] arm64: dts: rockchip: update mipi cells for RK3399

2017-12-04 Thread Heiko Stuebner
Am Mittwoch, 29. November 2017, 10:47:55 CET schrieb Brian Norris: > From: Nickey Yang > > We might include additional ports in derivative device trees, so the > 'port' node should have an address, and the parent 'ports' node needs > /#{addres,size}-cells. > > v4: >

Re: [PATCH v4] arm64: dts: rockchip: update mipi cells for RK3399

2017-11-29 Thread Doug Anderson
Hi, On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Brian Norris wrote: > From: Nickey Yang > > We might include additional ports in derivative device trees, so the > 'port' node should have an address, and the parent 'ports' node needs >

[PATCH v4] arm64: dts: rockchip: update mipi cells for RK3399

2017-11-29 Thread Brian Norris
From: Nickey Yang We might include additional ports in derivative device trees, so the 'port' node should have an address, and the parent 'ports' node needs /#{addres,size}-cells. v4: * keep #{address,size}-cells in both 'ports' and 'port@0' nodes * separate from