Hi Matt,
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 02:30:33PM -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 07:42:34PM +0100, Andi Shyti wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 09:03:10AM -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 09:19:50PM +0100, Andi Shyti wrote:
> > > > + /*
>
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 07:42:34PM +0100, Andi Shyti wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 09:03:10AM -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 09:19:50PM +0100, Andi Shyti wrote:
> > > + /*
> > > + * Do not create the command streamer for CCS sl
Hi Matt,
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 09:03:10AM -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 09:19:50PM +0100, Andi Shyti wrote:
> > + /*
> > +* Do not create the command streamer for CCS slices
> > +* beyond the first. All the workload s
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 09:19:50PM +0100, Andi Shyti wrote:
> We want a fixed load CCS balancing consisting in all slices
> sharing one single user engine. For this reason do not create the
> intel_engine_cs structure with its dedicated command streamer for
> CCS slices beyond the first.
>
> Fixes
We want a fixed load CCS balancing consisting in all slices
sharing one single user engine. For this reason do not create the
intel_engine_cs structure with its dedicated command streamer for
CCS slices beyond the first.
Fixes: d2eae8e98d59 ("drm/i915/dg2: Drop force_probe requirement")
Signed-off
