On Tue, 05 Mar 2024, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 07:43:07PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>>Thanks everyone for acks and reviews, pushed to drm-misc-next.
>
> should we start removing the now duplicate ones in i915 and xe?
After the drm-misc-next to drm-next merge and subsequent
On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 07:43:07PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Tue, 05 Mar 2024, "Maxime Ripard" wrote:
On Tue, 5 Mar 2024 11:07:34 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
Resend of [1] with an intent to merge after the CI results come in. This
is aiming for v6.10, so we'll have maximal time to find all th
On Tue, 05 Mar 2024, "Maxime Ripard" wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Mar 2024 11:07:34 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> Resend of [1] with an intent to merge after the CI results come in. This
>> is aiming for v6.10, so we'll have maximal time to find all the issues
>> my configs didn't catch.
>>
>> I built this
On Tue, 5 Mar 2024 11:07:34 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Resend of [1] with an intent to merge after the CI results come in. This
> is aiming for v6.10, so we'll have maximal time to find all the issues
> my configs didn't catch.
>
> I built this on x86-64 (both gcc and clang), arm and arm64, and
>
Resend of [1] with an intent to merge after the CI results come in. This
is aiming for v6.10, so we'll have maximal time to find all the issues
my configs didn't catch.
I built this on x86-64 (both gcc and clang), arm and arm64, and
everything passed.
BR,
Jani.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/co