Re: [RFC] new uapi policy for drm

2019-10-18 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 4:12 PM Alex Deucher wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 9:58 AM Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 04:00:25PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 2:16 PM Dave Airlie wrote: > > > > > > > > I've kicked this around in my head over the

Re: [RFC] new uapi policy for drm

2019-10-17 Thread Alex Deucher
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 9:58 AM Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 04:00:25PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 2:16 PM Dave Airlie wrote: > > > > > > I've kicked this around in my head over the past few weeks but wanted > > > to get some feedback on whether

Re: [RFC] new uapi policy for drm

2019-10-17 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 04:00:25PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 2:16 PM Dave Airlie wrote: > > > > I've kicked this around in my head over the past few weeks but wanted > > to get some feedback on whether it's a good idea or what impact it > > might have that I haven't

Re: [RFC] new uapi policy for drm

2019-10-16 Thread Dave Airlie
On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 at 03:28, Matt Roper wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 04:16:00AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > > I've kicked this around in my head over the past few weeks but wanted > > to get some feedback on whether it's a good idea or what impact it > > might have that I haven't

Re: [RFC] new uapi policy for drm

2019-10-16 Thread Dave Airlie
On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 at 06:00, Alex Deucher wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 2:16 PM Dave Airlie wrote: > > > > I've kicked this around in my head over the past few weeks but wanted > > to get some feedback on whether it's a good idea or what impact it > > might have that I haven't considered.

Re: [RFC] new uapi policy for drm

2019-10-16 Thread Sean Paul
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 04:16:00AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > I've kicked this around in my head over the past few weeks but wanted > to get some feedback on whether it's a good idea or what impact it > might have that I haven't considered. > > We are getting requests via both amdgpu/amdkfd and

Re: [RFC] new uapi policy for drm

2019-10-16 Thread Alex Deucher
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 2:16 PM Dave Airlie wrote: > > I've kicked this around in my head over the past few weeks but wanted > to get some feedback on whether it's a good idea or what impact it > might have that I haven't considered. > > We are getting requests via both amdgpu/amdkfd and i915 for

Re: [RFC] new uapi policy for drm

2019-10-16 Thread Stéphane Marchesin
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 10:28 AM Matt Roper wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 04:16:00AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > > I've kicked this around in my head over the past few weeks but wanted > > to get some feedback on whether it's a good idea or what impact it > > might have that I haven't

Re: [RFC] new uapi policy for drm

2019-10-16 Thread Matt Roper
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 04:16:00AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > I've kicked this around in my head over the past few weeks but wanted > to get some feedback on whether it's a good idea or what impact it > might have that I haven't considered. > > We are getting requests via both amdgpu/amdkfd and

Re: [RFC] new uapi policy for drm

2019-10-15 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 01:55:41PM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 04:16:00AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > > I've kicked this around in my head over the past few weeks but wanted > > to get some feedback on whether it's a good idea or what impact it > > might have that I

Re: [RFC] new uapi policy for drm

2019-10-15 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 04:16:00AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > I've kicked this around in my head over the past few weeks but wanted > to get some feedback on whether it's a good idea or what impact it > might have that I haven't considered. > > We are getting requests via both amdgpu/amdkfd and

[RFC] new uapi policy for drm

2019-10-14 Thread Dave Airlie
I've kicked this around in my head over the past few weeks but wanted to get some feedback on whether it's a good idea or what impact it might have that I haven't considered. We are getting requests via both amdgpu/amdkfd and i915 for new user APIs for userspace drivers that throw code over the