Jesse, cc'ing you in case you have thoughts about this for the intel
side of things?
On Nov 17, 2011, at 4:39 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> 2011/11/17 Michel D?nzer :
>> [ Dropping intel-gfx list from CC, as it automatically rejects posts
>> from non-subscribers ]
>>
>> On Mit, 2011-11-16 at 2
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Mario Kleiner
wrote:
> Jesse, cc'ing you in case you have thoughts about this for the intel side of
> things?
>
> On Nov 17, 2011, at 4:39 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>
>> 2011/11/17 Michel Dänzer :
>>>
>>> [ Dropping intel-gfx list from CC, as it automatically re
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Mario Kleiner
wrote:
> Jesse, cc'ing you in case you have thoughts about this for the intel side of
> things?
>
> On Nov 17, 2011, at 4:39 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>
>> 2011/11/17 Michel D?nzer :
>>>
>>> [ Dropping intel-gfx list from CC, as it automatically re
Jesse, cc'ing you in case you have thoughts about this for the intel
side of things?
On Nov 17, 2011, at 4:39 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
2011/11/17 Michel Dänzer :
[ Dropping intel-gfx list from CC, as it automatically rejects posts
from non-subscribers ]
On Mit, 2011-11-16 at 21:39 -0800
[ Dropping intel-gfx list from CC, as it automatically rejects posts
from non-subscribers ]
On Mit, 2011-11-16 at 21:39 -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> There are two possible races when disabling vblanks. If the IRQ
> fired but the hardware didn't update its counter yet, then we store
> too low
2011/11/17 Michel Dänzer :
> [ Dropping intel-gfx list from CC, as it automatically rejects posts
> from non-subscribers ]
>
> On Mit, 2011-11-16 at 21:39 -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> There are two possible races when disabling vblanks. If the IRQ
>> fired but the hardware didn't update its co
2011/11/17 Michel D?nzer :
> [ Dropping intel-gfx list from CC, as it automatically rejects posts
> from non-subscribers ]
>
> On Mit, 2011-11-16 at 21:39 -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> There are two possible races when disabling vblanks. ?If the IRQ
>> fired but the hardware didn't update its co
[ Dropping intel-gfx list from CC, as it automatically rejects posts
from non-subscribers ]
On Mit, 2011-11-16 at 21:39 -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> There are two possible races when disabling vblanks. If the IRQ
> fired but the hardware didn't update its counter yet, then we store
> too low
There are two possible races when disabling vblanks. If the IRQ
fired but the hardware didn't update its counter yet, then we store
too low a hardware counter. (Sensible hardware never does this.
Apparently not all hardware is sensible.) If, on the other hand,
the counter updated but the IRQ did
There are two possible races when disabling vblanks. If the IRQ
fired but the hardware didn't update its counter yet, then we store
too low a hardware counter. (Sensible hardware never does this.
Apparently not all hardware is sensible.) If, on the other hand,
the counter updated but the IRQ did
10 matches
Mail list logo
