On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 01:31:36PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Back from a week off, I've hoovered up everything and backmerged -rc8 on top.
>
> If I've missed anything please let me know, I haven't seen next trees
> for exynos or nouveau, as possibly a few
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 05:07:04PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:31 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > Back from a week off, I've hoovered up everything and backmerged -rc8 on
> > top.
> >
> > If I've missed anything
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:31 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Back from a week off, I've hoovered up everything and backmerged -rc8 on top.
>
> If I've missed anything please let me know, I haven't seen next trees
> for exynos or nouveau, as possibly a few others, but th
Hey all,
Back from a week off, I've hoovered up everything and backmerged -rc8 on top.
If I've missed anything please let me know, I haven't seen next trees
for exynos or nouveau, as possibly a few others, but those are the
main two I noticed.
Dave.
On 13 December 2015 at 05:09, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 10:58 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>>
>> So since Xmas is coming up and I've got an impending new arrival, I'm
>> betting this merge window might get a bit haphazard. So I'd like
>> people to start telling me now via git
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 10:58 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> So since Xmas is coming up and I've got an impending new arrival, I'm
> betting this merge window might get a bit haphazard. So I'd like
> people to start telling me now via git pull's what they'd like to get
> in.
So the rest of the world
Am Freitag, den 11.12.2015, 17:36 + schrieb Russell King - ARM
Linux:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 05:15:40PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 10:02:45AM +, Russell King - ARM Linux
> > wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 04:58:08PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > > >
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 05:15:40PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 10:02:45AM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 04:58:08PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > > I've seen etnaviv, rockchip(?), vc4 gpu api, can I get plans for if
> > > people would
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 10:02:45AM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 04:58:08PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > I've seen etnaviv, rockchip(?), vc4 gpu api, can I get plans for if
> > people would like these in now, also anything I've missed on the list.
>
> I would
Hey all,
Hopefully all my sub-maintainers are awake and reading this.
So since Xmas is coming up and I've got an impending new arrival, I'm
betting this merge window might get a bit haphazard. So I'd like
people to start telling me now via git pull's what they'd like to get
in.
I've seen
Hi Dave,
2015ë
12ì 11ì¼ 15:58ì Dave Airlie ì´(ê°) ì´ ê¸:
> Hey all,
>
> Hopefully all my sub-maintainers are awake and reading this.
>
> So since Xmas is coming up and I've got an impending new arrival, I'm
> betting this merge window might get a bit haphazard. So I'd like
> people
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 04:58:08PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> Hey all,
Hi Dave,
>
> Hopefully all my sub-maintainers are awake and reading this.
>
> So since Xmas is coming up and I've got an impending new arrival, I'm
> betting this merge window might get a bit haphazard. So I'd like
>
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 04:58:08PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> I've seen etnaviv, rockchip(?), vc4 gpu api, can I get plans for if
> people would like these in now, also anything I've missed on the list.
I would definitely like to see etnaviv make it in for the next merge
window, but that depends
Hi Dave,
In case of exynos DRM, There are a new driver - mic - , new feature support
- atomic modeset/pageflip, and some cleanup for next. I'll have pull
request ASAP.
thanks,
Inki Dae
2015ë
4ì 1ì¼ ììì¼, Dave Airlieëì´ ìì±í
ë©ìì§:
> Hey,
>
> so outstanding n
Hey,
so outstanding next trees need to be landing asap, just a heads up,
probably should have sent this last week.
Dave.
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 04:04:43PM -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> On 09/26/2012 12:00 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> >On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 13:47 -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> >>
> >>1. The display (LG L246WP) is confused by *any* InfoFrames.
> >
> >If this is still the case after applying:
> >
> >commit
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 04:04:43PM -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote:
On 09/26/2012 12:00 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 13:47 -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote:
1. The display (LG L246WP) is confused by *any* InfoFrames.
If this is still the case after applying:
commit
On 09/26/2012 12:00 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 13:47 -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote:
>>
>> 1. The display (LG L246WP) is confused by *any* InfoFrames.
>
> If this is still the case after applying:
>
> commit adf00b26d18e1b3570451296e03bcb20e4798cdd
> Author: Paulo Zanoni
> Date:
On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 13:47 -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> In the meantime, I would like to move the ball forward on this issue.
> As I see it, there 3 issues that have become conflated:
>
> 1. The display (LG L246WP) is confused by *any* InfoFrames.
If this is still the case after applying:
On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 13:47 -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote:
In the meantime, I would like to move the ball forward on this issue.
As I see it, there 3 issues that have become conflated:
1. The display (LG L246WP) is confused by *any* InfoFrames.
If this is still the case after applying:
commit
On 09/26/2012 12:00 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 13:47 -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote:
1. The display (LG L246WP) is confused by *any* InfoFrames.
If this is still the case after applying:
commit adf00b26d18e1b3570451296e03bcb20e4798cdd
Author: Paulo Zanoni
On 09/24/2012 09:34 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> I'm sorry, I thought I was clearer. Daniel posted a patch to fix the
> Intel driver for this:
>
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2012-August/020046.html
>
> Which I didn't entirely ack, but which is essentially right. That's
> what
On 09/24/2012 09:34 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
I'm sorry, I thought I was clearer. Daniel posted a patch to fix the
Intel driver for this:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2012-August/020046.html
Which I didn't entirely ack, but which is essentially right. That's
what we should
On Sat, 2012-09-22 at 23:34 -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> On 09/12/2012 08:44 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > Ajax, I think Ian still has an open request on how to proceed with the
> > infoframes quirk nightmare.
>
> Indeed.
I'm sorry, I thought I was clearer. Daniel posted a patch to fix the
Intel
On Sat, 2012-09-22 at 23:34 -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote:
On 09/12/2012 08:44 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
Ajax, I think Ian still has an open request on how to proceed with the
infoframes quirk nightmare.
Indeed.
I'm sorry, I thought I was clearer. Daniel posted a patch to fix the
Intel driver
On 09/12/2012 08:44 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> Ajax, I think Ian still has an open request on how to proceed with the
> infoframes quirk nightmare.
Indeed.
On 08/30/2012 12:23 AM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> In terms of moving forward with the rest of the EDID quirk stuff, are
> you OK with either of
Am Donnerstag, den 13.09.2012, 11:44 +1000 schrieb Dave Airlie:
Just a reminder to the subtree maintainers that I should be starting
to see signs of -next trees lining up soon,
I've merged a bunch of patches from the list, but I'm sure I've forgotten
some,
I've got the 3 quirks from Paul
On 09/12/2012 08:44 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
Ajax, I think Ian still has an open request on how to proceed with the
infoframes quirk nightmare.
Indeed.
On 08/30/2012 12:23 AM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
In terms of moving forward with the rest of the EDID quirk stuff, are
you OK with either of these
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 8:44 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> Just a reminder to the subtree maintainers that I should be starting
> to see signs of -next trees lining up soon,
>
> I've merged a bunch of patches from the list, but I'm sure I've forgotten
> some,
> I've got the
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 8:44 PM, Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote:
Just a reminder to the subtree maintainers that I should be starting
to see signs of -next trees lining up soon,
I've merged a bunch of patches from the list, but I'm sure I've forgotten
some,
I've got the 3 quirks from
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> Just a reminder to the subtree maintainers that I should be starting
> to see signs of -next trees lining up soon,
>
> I've merged a bunch of patches from the list, but I'm sure I've forgotten
> some,
> I've got the
Just a reminder to the subtree maintainers that I should be starting
to see signs of -next trees lining up soon,
I've merged a bunch of patches from the list, but I'm sure I've forgotten some,
I've got the 3 quirks from Paul that I'm iffy about due to the lack of
testing against VGA ports
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote:
Just a reminder to the subtree maintainers that I should be starting
to see signs of -next trees lining up soon,
I've merged a bunch of patches from the list, but I'm sure I've forgotten
some,
I've got the 3 quirks from
Just a reminder to the subtree maintainers that I should be starting
to see signs of -next trees lining up soon,
I've merged a bunch of patches from the list, but I'm sure I've forgotten some,
I've got the 3 quirks from Paul that I'm iffy about due to the lack of
testing against VGA ports
34 matches
Mail list logo
