On 04/08/2023 16:27, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
Instead of requiring each driver to care for assigning the owner member
of struct pwm_ops, handle that implicitly using a macro. Note that the
owner member has to be moved to struct pwm_chip, as the ops structure
usually lives in read-only memory and
Hi,
Instead of requiring each driver to care for assigning the owner member
of struct pwm_ops, handle that implicitly using a macro. Note that the
owner member has to be moved to struct pwm_chip, as the ops structure
usually lives in read-only memory and so cannot be modified.
The upside is
Am Freitag, 4. August 2023, 16:27:06 CEST schrieb Uwe Kleine-König:
> Instead of requiring each driver to care for assigning the owner member
> of struct pwm_ops, handle that implicitly using a macro. Note that the
> owner member has to be moved to struct pwm_chip, as the ops structure
> usually
Hi Uwe,
> -Original Message-
> From: Uwe Kleine-König
> Sent: Friday, August 4, 2023 11:27 PM
> To: Thierry Reding ; Laurent Pinchart
>
> Cc: Linus Walleij ; Bartosz Golaszewski
> ; Andy Shevchenko ; Douglas Anderson
> ; Andrzej Hajda ; Neil
> Armstrong ; Robert Foss ;
> Jonas Karlman ;
Hi Uwe,
On Fri, Aug 04, 2023 at 04:27:06PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Instead of requiring each driver to care for assigning the owner member
> of struct pwm_ops, handle that implicitly using a macro. Note that the
> owner member has to be moved to struct pwm_chip, as the ops structure
>
Dne petek, 04. avgust 2023 ob 16:27:06 CEST je Uwe Kleine-König napisal(a):
> Instead of requiring each driver to care for assigning the owner member
> of struct pwm_ops, handle that implicitly using a macro. Note that the
> owner member has to be moved to struct pwm_chip, as the ops structure
>
On 8/4/23 07:27, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
Instead of requiring each driver to care for assigning the owner member
of struct pwm_ops, handle that implicitly using a macro. Note that the
owner member has to be moved to struct pwm_chip, as the ops structure
usually lives in read-only memory and so
On Fri, Aug 4, 2023 at 5:28 PM Uwe Kleine-König
wrote:
>
> Instead of requiring each driver to care for assigning the owner member
> of struct pwm_ops, handle that implicitly using a macro. Note that the
> owner member has to be moved to struct pwm_chip, as the ops structure
> usually lives in
