2013/6/25 Jerome Glisse j.gli...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Inki Dae daei...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/6/25 Rob Clark robdcl...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 5:09 AM, Inki Dae daei...@gmail.com wrote:
that
should be the role of kernel memory management which of course needs
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 5:09 AM, Inki Dae daei...@gmail.com wrote:
that
should be the role of kernel memory management which of course needs
synchronization btw A and B. But in no case this should be done using
dma-buf. dma-buf is for sharing content btw different devices not
sharing
2013/6/25 Rob Clark robdcl...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 5:09 AM, Inki Dae daei...@gmail.com wrote:
that
should be the role of kernel memory management which of course needs
synchronization btw A and B. But in no case this should be done using
dma-buf. dma-buf is for sharing content
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Inki Dae daei...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/6/25 Rob Clark robdcl...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 5:09 AM, Inki Dae daei...@gmail.com wrote:
that
should be the role of kernel memory management which of course needs
synchronization btw A and B. But in no case
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 05:28:08PM +0900, Inki Dae wrote:
This patch adds a buffer synchronization framework based on DMA BUF[1]
and reservation[2] to use dma-buf resource, and based on ww-mutexes[3]
for lock mechanism.
The purpose of this framework is not only to couple cache operations,
+static void dmabuf_sync_timeout_worker(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+ struct dmabuf_sync *sync = container_of(work, struct dmabuf_sync,
work);
+ struct dmabuf_sync_object *sobj;
+
+ mutex_lock(sync-lock);
+
+ list_for_each_entry(sobj, sync-syncs, head) {
+
;
kyungmin.p...@samsung.com; myungjoo@samsung.com; yj44@samsung.com;
linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-me...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] dmabuf-sync: Introduce buffer synchronization
framework
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 05:28:08PM +0900, Inki Dae wrote:
This patch
