On 3/16/2022 9:45 AM, Sankeerth Billakanti (QUIC) wrote:
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 4/5] drm/msm/dp: replace dp_connector with
drm_bridge_connector
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 16:40:56 -0800
From: Kuogee Hsieh
To: Stephen Boyd , Dmitry Baryshkov
CC: Abhinav Kumar , Bjorn Andersson
, Rob Clark
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 4/5] drm/msm/dp: replace dp_connector with
> drm_bridge_connector
> Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 16:40:56 -0800
> From: Kuogee Hsieh
> To: Stephen Boyd , Dmitry Baryshkov
>
> CC: Abhinav Kumar , Bjorn Andersson
> , Rob Clark , Sean Paul
> , D
On 2/23/2022 1:33 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Kuogee Hsieh (2022-02-23 10:27:26)
On 2/23/2022 10:22 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On 23/02/2022 20:21, Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
In the panel device node.
Can you please share it too?
{
edp_power_supply: edp_power {
Quoting Kuogee Hsieh (2022-02-23 10:27:26)
>
> On 2/23/2022 10:22 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On 23/02/2022 20:21, Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
> >
> > In the panel device node.
> >
> > Can you please share it too?
>
>
> {
> edp_power_supply: edp_power {
> compatible =
On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 at 21:27, Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
>
>
> On 2/23/2022 10:22 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On 23/02/2022 20:21, Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2/18/2022 6:22 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> >>> On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 at 03:55, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Dmitry Baryshkov
On 2/23/2022 10:22 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On 23/02/2022 20:21, Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
On 2/18/2022 6:22 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 at 03:55, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Dmitry Baryshkov (2022-02-18 14:32:53)
On 19/02/2022 00:31, Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
On 2/11/2022
On 23/02/2022 20:21, Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
On 2/18/2022 6:22 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 at 03:55, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Dmitry Baryshkov (2022-02-18 14:32:53)
On 19/02/2022 00:31, Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
On 2/11/2022 2:40 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
There is little
On 2/18/2022 6:22 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 at 03:55, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Dmitry Baryshkov (2022-02-18 14:32:53)
On 19/02/2022 00:31, Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
On 2/11/2022 2:40 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
There is little point in having both connector and root
On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 at 03:55, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
> Quoting Dmitry Baryshkov (2022-02-18 14:32:53)
> > On 19/02/2022 00:31, Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
> > >
> > > On 2/11/2022 2:40 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > >> There is little point in having both connector and root bridge
> > >> implementation
Quoting Dmitry Baryshkov (2022-02-18 14:32:53)
> On 19/02/2022 00:31, Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
> >
> > On 2/11/2022 2:40 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> >> There is little point in having both connector and root bridge
> >> implementation in the same driver. Move connector's functionality to the
> >>
On 19/02/2022 00:31, Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
On 2/11/2022 2:40 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
There is little point in having both connector and root bridge
implementation in the same driver. Move connector's functionality to the
bridge to let next bridge in chain to override it.
Signed-off-by:
On 19/02/2022 00:31, Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
On 2/11/2022 2:40 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
There is little point in having both connector and root bridge
implementation in the same driver. Move connector's functionality to the
bridge to let next bridge in chain to override it.
Signed-off-by:
On 2/11/2022 2:40 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
There is little point in having both connector and root bridge
implementation in the same driver. Move connector's functionality to the
bridge to let next bridge in chain to override it.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov
This patch break primary
13 matches
Mail list logo
