Am 25.02.24 um 22:47 schrieb Stephen Rothwell:
Hi all,
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 08:41:16 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 08:48:21 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 15:15:54 +0200 Jani Nikula
wrote:
On Tue, 06 Feb 2024, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
After
Hi all,
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 08:41:16 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 08:48:21 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 15:15:54 +0200 Jani Nikula
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 06 Feb 2024, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > >
> > > > After
Hi all,
On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 08:48:21 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 15:15:54 +0200 Jani Nikula
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 06 Feb 2024, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >
> > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (i386 defconfig)
> > > failed like
Hi Geert,
Thanks for the feedback.
> -Original Message-
> From: Geert Uytterhoeven
> Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2024 8:29 AM
> Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree
>
> Hi Biju,
>
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 9
Hi Maxime Ripard,
> -Original Message-
> From: Maxime Ripard
> Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2024 8:32 AM
> To: Biju Das
> Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree
>
> Hi Biju,
>
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 08:14
Hi Biju,
On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 08:14:14AM +, Biju Das wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Stephen Rothwell
> > Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2024 1:46 AM
> > Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the drm-misc
Hi Biju,
On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 9:14 AM Biju Das wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Stephen Rothwell
> > Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2024 1:46 AM
> > Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree
> >
> > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next
Hi All,
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Rothwell
> Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2024 1:46 AM
> Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree
>
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
Hi all,
On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 15:15:54 +0200 Jani Nikula
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 06 Feb 2024, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (i386 defconfig)
> > failed like this:
> >
> > In function 'i915_ttm_placement_from_obj',
> > inlined from
On Tue, 06 Feb 2024, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (i386 defconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> In function 'i915_ttm_placement_from_obj',
> inlined from 'i915_ttm_get_pages' at
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c:847:2:
>
On Mon, 12 Feb 2024, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Feb 2024, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
>> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>>
>> drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_mm_test.c: In function 'drm_test_mm_debug':
>>
On Mon, 12 Feb 2024, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_mm_test.c: In function 'drm_test_mm_debug':
> drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_mm_test.c:191:32: error: implicit
Hi all,
On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 15:28:50 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (i386 defconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> In function 'i915_ttm_placement_from_obj',
> inlined from 'i915_ttm_get_pages' at
>
On Wed, 07 Feb 2024, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> Indeed. Not even drm-misc itself compiles with xe enabled. I'll ping
> drm-misc maintainers.
We'll need CONFIG_DRM_XE=m enabled in drm-rerere/drm-misc-*_defconfig,
and get people to use that.
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
On Tue, 2024-02-06 at 14:21 -0600, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 01:39:28PM +0100, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > On Tue, 2024-02-06 at 12:28 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> >
Hi all,
On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 12:28:22 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c:41:10: error: 'struct ttm_placement' has no member
named 'num_busy_placement'; did you mean
On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 01:39:28PM +0100, Thomas Hellström wrote:
Hi
On Tue, 2024-02-06 at 12:28 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
Caused by commit
a78a8da51b36 ("drm/ttm: replace busy
Hi
On Tue, 2024-02-06 at 12:28 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
>
> Caused by commit
>
> a78a8da51b36 ("drm/ttm: replace busy placement with flags v6")
>
> interacting with
On Tue, 06 Feb 2024, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
>
> Caused by commit
>
> a78a8da51b36 ("drm/ttm: replace busy placement with flags v6")
>
> interacting with commit
>
> dd08ebf6c352
On 2023-11-26 18:38, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_sched.c:21:41: error:
> 'DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_MIN' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean
Hi all,
On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 12:27:49 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 12:22:09 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > drivers/usb/typec/altmodes/displayport.c:
On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 12:27:49PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 12:22:09 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >
> >
Hi all,
On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 12:22:09 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/usb/typec/altmodes/displayport.c: In function 'dp_altmode_vdm':
>
Hi Qiang,
On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 16:51:27 +0800 Qiang Yu wrote:
>
> I think you can just revert the following three lima commits when merge:
> * 4a66f3da99dc ("drm/lima: add show_fdinfo for drm usage stats")
> * 87767de835ed ("drm/lima: allocate unique id per drm_file")
> * bccafec957a5 ("drm/lima:
I think you can just revert the following three lima commits when merge:
* 4a66f3da99dc ("drm/lima: add show_fdinfo for drm usage stats")
* 87767de835ed ("drm/lima: allocate unique id per drm_file")
* bccafec957a5 ("drm/lima: add usage counting method to ctx_mgr")
Regards,
Qiang
On Mon, Apr 3,
Hi
Am 23.11.22 um 06:35 schrieb David Airlie:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 3:21 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 18:32:14 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc44x_defconfig) failed like this:
ld:
Hi Dave,
On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 15:35:50 +1000 David Airlie wrote:
>
> Nothing gone wrong as such, just the drm-misc-next pull request was
> sent on a regular weekly cadence, then I merged it a few days later.
> The fix for this is still in the drm-misc-next queue for the next PR
> which I will get
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 3:21 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 18:32:14 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > ppc44x_defconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > ld: drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmon.o:
Hi all,
On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 18:32:14 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc44x_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> ld: drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmon.o: in function `fb_modesetting_disabled':
> fbmon.c:(.text+0x1e4): multiple
On Fri, 2022-10-21 at 11:02 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c: In function
> 'nouveau_display_create':
>
On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 11:04:51AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 10:48:17 +0300 Ville Syrjälä
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 12:36:56PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >
> > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> >
Hi all,
On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 10:48:17 +0300 Ville Syrjälä
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 12:36:56PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/xlnx/zynqmp_disp.c: In
On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 12:36:56PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/xlnx/zynqmp_disp.c: In function 'zynqmp_disp_create_planes':
>
Hello Stephen,
On 6/10/22 06:49, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/firmware/efi/sysfb_efi.c:29:10: fatal error: asm/efi.h: No such file
> or directory
>29 | #include
>
Am 08.04.22 um 03:10 schrieb Stephen Rothwell:
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
In file included from include/drm/drm_gem.h:38,
from include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h:34,
from
Hi Stephen,
Le mer., avril 6 2022 at 10:50:49 +1000, Stephen Rothwell
a écrit :
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-newvision-nv3052c.c:478:19: error:
initialization of 'void (*)(struct
On Tue, 09 Nov 2021, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 09:40:08AM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Sat, 06 Nov 2021, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> > Hi Jani,
>> >
>> > On Fri, 05 Nov 2021 13:03:43 +0200 Jani Nikula
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I probably should have pushed c4f08d7246a5
On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 09:40:08AM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Sat, 06 Nov 2021, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Jani,
> >
> > On Fri, 05 Nov 2021 13:03:43 +0200 Jani Nikula
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> I probably should have pushed c4f08d7246a5 ("drm/locking: fix
> >> __stack_depot_* name conflict")
On Sat, 06 Nov 2021, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Jani,
>
> On Fri, 05 Nov 2021 13:03:43 +0200 Jani Nikula wrote:
>>
>> I probably should have pushed c4f08d7246a5 ("drm/locking: fix
>> __stack_depot_* name conflict") to drm-misc-next-fixes.
>
> Please do so as builds will start failing otherwise
Hi Jani,
On Fri, 05 Nov 2021 13:03:43 +0200 Jani Nikula wrote:
>
> I probably should have pushed c4f08d7246a5 ("drm/locking: fix
> __stack_depot_* name conflict") to drm-misc-next-fixes.
Please do so as builds will start failing otherwise :-(
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
pgpAxSxKLNrL7.pgp
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 01:03:43PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Nov 2021, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > On Mon, 1 Nov 2021 19:42:23 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 20:26:48 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > After
On Fri, 05 Nov 2021, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Mon, 1 Nov 2021 19:42:23 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 20:26:48 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
>> > multi_v7_defconfig) failed
Hi all,
On Mon, 1 Nov 2021 19:42:23 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 20:26:48 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
> >
> >
Hi all,
On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 20:26:48 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modeset_lock.c:111:29: error: conflicting types for
> '__stack_depot_save'
> 111 | static
Hi Jani,
On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 12:56:58 +0300 Jani Nikula wrote:
>
> The fix looks good, but I'd rename __stack_depot_print too added in the
> same commit. Do you want to respin or shall I take it from here?
If you are happy to take it on, then thanks.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
On Fri, 15 Oct 2021, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modeset_lock.c:111:29: error: conflicting types for
> '__stack_depot_save'
> 111 | static
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 5:02 AM wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I review the code.
>
> It seems I forget to delete the definition of the variable "inst",I'm sry for
> that.: (
>
> I'll submit another patch soon.
>
I already wrote the patch and pushed it:
uhh, that's on me. I will send out a patch today. I just noticed that
the config file I used for testing had WERROR disabled.
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 4:18 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like
On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 09:11:57AM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> Am 08.06.21 um 09:06 schrieb Felix Kuehling:
> > Am 2021-06-08 um 2:55 a.m. schrieb Christian König:
> > > Hi Felix,
> > >
> > > that should already be fixed in drm-tip as part of the merge of the
> > > TTM changes.
> > No, the
Am 08.06.21 um 09:06 schrieb Felix Kuehling:
Am 2021-06-08 um 2:55 a.m. schrieb Christian König:
Hi Felix,
that should already be fixed in drm-tip as part of the merge of the
TTM changes.
No, the preempt_mgr doesn't exist in drm-misc-next. It does exist in
drm-next, but that doesn't seem to
Am 2021-06-08 um 2:55 a.m. schrieb Christian König:
> Hi Felix,
>
> that should already be fixed in drm-tip as part of the merge of the
> TTM changes.
No, the preempt_mgr doesn't exist in drm-misc-next. It does exist in
drm-next, but that doesn't seem to have the TTM changes yet.
Is there
Hi Felix,
that should already be fixed in drm-tip as part of the merge of the TTM
changes.
Regards,
Christian.
Am 08.06.21 um 07:37 schrieb Felix Kuehling:
Hi Christian,
I based amdgpu_preempt_mgr on amdgpu_gtt_mgr and now I'm looking at what
changed there. Looks like I'll need to create a
Hi Christian,
I based amdgpu_preempt_mgr on amdgpu_gtt_mgr and now I'm looking at what
changed there. Looks like I'll need to create a dummy node in
amdgpu_preempt_mgr_new to satisfy TTM, and free it in
amdgpu_preempt_mgr_del.
Thanks,
Felix
Am 2021-06-07 um 10:50 p.m. schrieb Stephen
Ah, yes. I've forgot to include the infiniband subdir in the automated
rename. I should have done that treewide.
Going to provide a fix in a minute, sorry for the noise.
Christian.
Am 07.06.21 um 04:33 schrieb Stephen Rothwell:
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next
Hi
Am 12.05.21 um 07:00 schrieb Stephen Rothwell:
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_connector.c: In function
'nouveau_connector_of_detect':
Op 2021-02-10 om 04:11 schreef Stephen Rothwell:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/v3d/v3d_sched.c:263:1: error: return type is an incomplete
> type
> 263 | v3d_gpu_reset_for_timeout(struct
Hi
Am 14.01.21 um 01:31 schrieb Stephen Rothwell:
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_cache.c: In function 'drm_need_swiotlb':
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_cache.c:202:6: error: implicit declaration of
On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 05:10:15PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Mon, 2 Nov 2020 05:19:06 -0500 "Michael S. Tsirkin"
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 12:43:27PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >
> > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build
Hi Michael,
On Mon, 2 Nov 2020 05:19:06 -0500 "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 12:43:27PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > In file included from
On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 10:27:11AM +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 10:28:34AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > --- a/include/linux/swiotlb.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/swiotlb.h
> > > @@ -5,6 +5,9 @@
> > > #include
> > > #include
> > > #include
> > > +#ifndef
On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 11:23 AM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 10:28:34AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 2:43 AM Stephen Rothwell
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> > >
On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 10:28:34AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 2:43 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > In file included from
On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 12:43:27PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_ttm.c:26:
> include/linux/swiotlb.h: In function
On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 2:43 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_ttm.c:26:
> include/linux/swiotlb.h: In function
Am 30.10.20 um 01:07 schrieb Stephen Rothwell:
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_ttm.c: In function 'nouveau_ttm_init':
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_ttm.c:320:19: error: implicit
Hi Stephen,
Le lun. 12 oct. 2020 à 15:24, Stephen Rothwell
a écrit :
Hi all,
On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 15:42:02 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 14:09:03 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig)
Hi Stephen,
Le lun. 12 oct. 2020 à 15:24, Stephen Rothwell
a écrit :
Hi all,
On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 15:42:02 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 14:09:03 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig)
Hi all,
[Just adding Dave to cc's]
On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 15:24:52 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 15:42:02 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 14:09:03 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > After merging the drm-misc tree,
Hi all,
On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 15:42:02 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 14:09:03 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> In file included from include/linux/clk.h:13,
Hi all,
On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 14:09:03 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
In file included from include/linux/clk.h:13,
from drivers/gpu/drm/ingenic/ingenic-drm-drv.c:10:
Hi all,
On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 10:55:47 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_display.c: In function
> 'qxl_display_read_client_monitors_config':
>
Hi Dave,
On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 15:47:49 +1000 Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> My bad, my local builds passed, as I had made the change but forgot
> the commit --amend
>
> Pushed out a new head with it in it now.
Excellent, thanks.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
pgp5N0nNZ8kAr.pgp
Description: OpenPGP
On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 at 11:36, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 10:59:29 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >
> >
Hi all,
On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 10:59:29 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c: In function
> 'amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_free_memory_of_gpu':
>
Hi Stephen,
On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 at 08:03, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 08:33:24 +0200 Thomas Zimmermann
> wrote:
> >
> > We recently dropped the _unlock() suffix from drm_gem_object_put(). This
> > patch should be ok.
>
> Yes, but what it shows is that the
Hi Thomas,
On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 08:33:24 +0200 Thomas Zimmermann
wrote:
>
> We recently dropped the _unlock() suffix from drm_gem_object_put(). This
> patch should be ok.
Yes, but what it shows is that the drm-misc tree is still based on
v5.7-rc1 and v5.8-rc1 has about 16000 more commits for
Hi
Am 17.06.20 um 02:59 schrieb Stephen Rothwell:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c: In function
> 'amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_free_memory_of_gpu':
>
On 4/29/20 10:09 AM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On 4/29/20 12:33 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:01:18 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
>>> allyesconfig)
Hi Stephen,
On 4/29/20 12:33 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:01:18 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>>
>> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
>> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>>
>> drivers/video/fbdev/controlfb.c: In function
Hi all,
On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:01:18 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/video/fbdev/controlfb.c: In function 'controlfb_mmap':
> drivers/video/fbdev/controlfb.c:756:23: error:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 9:22 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Tue, 17 Dec 2019 14:19:37 +0100 Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 12:23:31PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >
> > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > >
Hi Daniel,
On Tue, 17 Dec 2019 14:19:37 +0100 Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 12:23:31PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >
> >
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 12:23:31PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c: In function
> 'anx6345_i2c_probe':
>
Applied. Thanks!
Alex
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 8:22 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_tmz.c:23:10: fatal error: drm/drmP.h: No
> such file or
Hi all,
This is now a semantic conflict between the drm and v4l-dvb trees.
On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 10:30:45 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/media/platform/cec-gpio/cec-gpio.c: In function
Applied. thanks!
Alex
On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 8:36 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdkfd/kfd_module.c:25:
>
On 10/8/19 1:30 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
>
> Caused by commit
>
> 10d8f308ba3e ("cec: add cec_adapter to cec_notifier_cec_adap_unregister()")
>
> interacting with commit
>
Hi all,
On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 10:30:45 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
Sorry, forgot to include the error messages. But they shuld be clear
from the fix ...
--
Cheers,
Stephen
> I applied the following fix patch:
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell
> Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 18:37:40 +1000
> Subject: [PATCH] drm/virtio: module_param_named() requires linux/moduleparam.h
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_object.c | 2 ++
> 1 file
On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 06:08:55PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Gerd,
>
> > >drm_fb_memcpy_dstclip(__io_virt(cirrus->vram),
> > > ^
> > > __do_irq
> >
> > Probably just a missing arm/io.h include.
>
> I assume you meant
Hi Gerd,
On Tue, 9 Apr 2019 09:22:18 +0200 Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 04:08:49PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > allyesconfig) failed like this:
> >
> >
On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 04:08:49PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/cirrus/cirrus.c: In function 'cirrus_fb_blit_rect':
> drivers/gpu/drm/cirrus/cirrus.c:310:25:
Hi Dave,
On Fri, 5 Apr 2019 15:55:50 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> kernel/dma/contiguous.c:19:10: fatal error: asm/dma-contiguous.h: No such
> file or directory
> #include
>
On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 01:55:03PM +0800, Qiang Yu wrote:
> Thanks, patch is:
> Reviewed-by: Qiang Yu
This looks like a fairly naive conversion from the old IDR API to the
XArray API. You should be able to remove mgr->lock entirely, relying on
the xa_lock for synchronising free and get. If you
On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 10:50:06AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_ctx.c
> @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ int lima_ctx_create(struct lima_device *dev, struct
> lima_ctx_mgr *mgr, u32 *id)
> goto err_out0;
> }
>
> - err = xa_alloc(>handles, id,
On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 09:56:08PM +0800, Qiang Yu wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 7:26 PM Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 01:55:03PM +0800, Qiang Yu wrote:
> > > Thanks, patch is:
> > > Reviewed-by: Qiang Yu
> >
> > This looks like a fairly naive conversion from the old
On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 7:26 PM Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 01:55:03PM +0800, Qiang Yu wrote:
> > Thanks, patch is:
> > Reviewed-by: Qiang Yu
>
> This looks like a fairly naive conversion from the old IDR API to the
> XArray API. You should be able to remove mgr->lock
On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 7:21 PM Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 10:50:06AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_ctx.c
> > @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ int lima_ctx_create(struct lima_device *dev, struct
> > lima_ctx_mgr *mgr, u32 *id)
> >
On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 04:59:37PM +0800, Qiang Yu wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 3:57 PM Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 01:55:03PM +0800, Qiang Yu wrote:
> > > Thanks, patch is:
> > > Reviewed-by: Qiang Yu
> >
> > Good time to get started with committing patches? In
On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 3:57 PM Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 01:55:03PM +0800, Qiang Yu wrote:
> > Thanks, patch is:
> > Reviewed-by: Qiang Yu
>
> Good time to get started with committing patches? In general it's kinda
> confusing if the maintainer r-bs a patch, but doesn't
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
