On Thu, 7 Apr 2022 03:19:43 -0400
Zhi Wang wrote:
> From: Zhi Wang
>
> To support the new mdev interfaces and the re-factor patches from
> Christoph, which moves the GVT-g code into a dedicated module, the GVT-g
> MMIO tracking table needs to be separated from GVT-g.
>
Since this commit I'm
On Wed, 13 Apr 2022, "Wang, Zhi A" wrote:
> Hi Jani:
>
> Previously when I sent a pull request, it will be top of a tag in
> drm-intel-next. The following patches move the DMC related registers, which
> is used by GVT-g into intel_dmc_regs.h and it is not included in the latest
> tag.
>
>
Hi Jani:
Previously when I sent a pull request, it will be top of a tag in
drm-intel-next. The following patches move the DMC related registers, which is
used by GVT-g into intel_dmc_regs.h and it is not included in the latest tag.
commit 9c67d9e84c7d4a3a2371a54ee2dddc4699002000
Author: Jani
On Fri, 08 Apr 2022, "Wang, Zhi A" wrote:
> Hi Jani:
>
> Thanks so much for the help. Can you generate a new tag on
> drm-intel-next? I noticed that there was one patch moving the DMC
> related registers into display/intel_dmc_regs.h, which is not included
> in the latest tag on drm-intel-next.
Ping. :)
On 4/8/22 2:07 PM, Zhi Wang wrote:
> Hi Jani:
>
> Thanks so much for the help. Can you generate a new tag on drm-intel-next? I
> noticed that there was one patch moving the DMC related registers into
> display/intel_dmc_regs.h, which is not included in the latest tag on
>
Hi Jani:
Thanks so much for the help. Can you generate a new tag on drm-intel-next? I
noticed that there was one patch moving the DMC related registers into
display/intel_dmc_regs.h, which is not included in the latest tag on
drm-intel-next.
Guess it would be better that I can change this
On Thu, 07 Apr 2022, Zhi Wang wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_gvt.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_gvt.h
> index d7d3fb6186fd..7665d7cf0bdd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_gvt.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_gvt.h
> @@ -26,7 +26,17 @@
>
> struct
On 2022.04.07 03:19:43 -0400, Zhi Wang wrote:
> From: Zhi Wang
>
> To support the new mdev interfaces and the re-factor patches from
> Christoph, which moves the GVT-g code into a dedicated module, the GVT-g
> MMIO tracking table needs to be separated from GVT-g.
>
Looks fine to me. Thanks!
Thanks so much!
Jani and Joonas, it would be better to have one rb from i915 maintainers as
this patches also modify i915 code.
Thanks,
Zhi.
On 4/7/22 8:06 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The whole series looks good and works fine on by Kaby Lake Thinkpad:
>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig
>
