Re: [RESEND v3 0/2] drm: enable W=1 warnings by default across the subsystem

2024-03-05 Thread Jani Nikula
On Tue, 05 Mar 2024, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 07:43:07PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: >>Thanks everyone for acks and reviews, pushed to drm-misc-next. > > should we start removing the now duplicate ones in i915 and xe? After the drm-misc-next to drm-next merge and subsequent

Re: [RESEND v3 0/2] drm: enable W=1 warnings by default across the subsystem

2024-03-05 Thread Lucas De Marchi
On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 07:43:07PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: On Tue, 05 Mar 2024, "Maxime Ripard" wrote: On Tue, 5 Mar 2024 11:07:34 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: Resend of [1] with an intent to merge after the CI results come in. This is aiming for v6.10, so we'll have maximal time to find all

Re: [RESEND v3 0/2] drm: enable W=1 warnings by default across the subsystem

2024-03-05 Thread Jani Nikula
On Tue, 05 Mar 2024, "Maxime Ripard" wrote: > On Tue, 5 Mar 2024 11:07:34 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: >> Resend of [1] with an intent to merge after the CI results come in. This >> is aiming for v6.10, so we'll have maximal time to find all the issues >> my configs didn't catch. >> >> I built this

Re: [RESEND v3 0/2] drm: enable W=1 warnings by default across the subsystem

2024-03-05 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Tue, 5 Mar 2024 11:07:34 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > Resend of [1] with an intent to merge after the CI results come in. This > is aiming for v6.10, so we'll have maximal time to find all the issues > my configs didn't catch. > > I built this on x86-64 (both gcc and clang), arm and arm64, and