On Wed, 04 Jan 2017, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> What is the general opinion about out-of-tree static analyzer
> annotations in drm driver code, for example comments like
>
> /* coverity[missing_lock] */
>
> which typically squelches false positives in constructors or destructo
Hi,
On 01/05/2017 12:38 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Jan 2017, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
>> What is the general opinion about out-of-tree static analyzer
>> annotations in drm driver code, for example comments like
>>
>> /* coverity[missing_lock] */
>>
&
Hi!
What is the general opinion about out-of-tree static analyzer
annotations in drm driver code, for example comments like
/* coverity[missing_lock] */
which typically squelches false positives in constructors or destructors
of refcounted structs that contain members that are elsewhere
