[Bug 31578] r600g: enforce minimum stride on render target texture images causes texture corruption on teapot demp.

2010-11-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31578 --- Comment #3 from Tilman Sauerbeck til...@code-monkey.de 2010-11-18 00:06:55 PST --- Retry with the tip of the master branch (and throw away the patch I posted). Commit a23f25eba1fb8919a29efb88ef9e351abcc65b2e should fix this. -- Configure

[Bug 31708] New: kernel oops when loading large images with firefox

2010-11-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31708 Summary: kernel oops when loading large images with firefox Product: DRI Version: XOrg CVS Platform: x86 (IA32) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Bug 31708] kernel oops when loading large images with firefox

2010-11-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31708 --- Comment #1 from Manuel Lauss manuel.la...@gmail.com 2010-11-18 04:47:29 PST --- When the BUG() in ttm_bo.c:1123 triggers, the values are as follows: bo-mem.num_pages = 16984, placement-lpfn =16384, placement-fpfn = 0 Hope that helps a bit.

[Bug 31708] kernel oops when loading large images with firefox

2010-11-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31708 --- Comment #2 from Manuel Lauss manuel.la...@gmail.com 2010-11-18 05:07:36 PST --- I applied the following patch to the kernel; with it firefox loads and displays the image. diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c

Re: [PATCH] drm/radeon/kms: register an i2c adapter name for the dp aux bus

2010-11-18 Thread Jean Delvare
Hi Alex, On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 17:56:49 -0500, Alex Deucher wrote: This causes the connector to not be added since i2c init fails for the adapter. Fixes: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31688 Good catch. It may seem to be a little harsh but I'm glad I added the check to i2c-core.

git repos, r600g prerequites

2010-11-18 Thread Marius Gröger
Hi, I find the various git repositories for drm sometimes a little confusing. For example, what is the difference between d-n and d-c-n? Maybe it would be a good idea to fill out the gitweb information for each each repository. Currently they all report Unnamed repository; edit this file to

Re: git repos, r600g prerequites

2010-11-18 Thread Jerome Glisse
2010/11/18 Marius Gröger marius.groe...@googlemail.com: Hi, I find the various git repositories for drm sometimes a little confusing. For example, what is the difference between d-n and d-c-n? Maybe it would be a good idea to fill out the gitweb information for each each repository.

Re: [PATCH] drm/radeon/kms: i2c s/sprintf/snprintf/g for safety

2010-11-18 Thread Jean Delvare
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 11:37:18 -0500, Alex Deucher wrote: As per advice from Jean Delvare. Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com Cc: Jean Delvare kh...@linux-fr.org Thanks Alex. Acked-by: Jean Delvare kh...@linux-fr.org --- drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_i2c.c |9 ++---

[Bug 31400] [RV740] Mipmapping broken in drm-radeon-next / drm-next

2010-11-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31400 Alex Deucher ag...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Bug 30049] 2.6.36-rc3: divide by zero in radeon_crtc_scaling_mode_fixup

2010-11-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30049 Alex Deucher ag...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug 29738] SIGBUS after upgrade to 2.6.36-rc1-git4 [full stacktrace]

2010-11-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29738 --- Comment #24 from Alex Deucher ag...@yahoo.com 2010-11-18 10:13:34 PST --- This should be fixed in 2.6.36. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You

[Bug 29738] SIGBUS after upgrade to 2.6.36-rc1-git4 [full stacktrace]

2010-11-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29738 Alex Deucher ag...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Bug 29340] missing copy_from_user? radeon_info_ioctl

2010-11-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29340 Alex Deucher ag...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug 31732] X crashes with X: radeon_texture.c:682: radeon_store_teximage: Assertion `0' failed.

2010-11-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31732 Alex Deucher ag...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added Product|xorg|Mesa

[Bug 31667] r600c and r600g: wrong rendering for Savage2 game

2010-11-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31667 --- Comment #7 from Török Edwin edwinto...@gmail.com 2010-11-18 10:28:10 PST --- The missing character is a similar symptom to that of this bug for r300g which got fixed: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28517 Do you need the

[Bug 31708] kernel oops when loading large images with firefox

2010-11-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31708 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Hellström thellst...@vmware.com 2010-11-18 10:38:04 PST --- This looks like a radeon driver bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug 31708] kernel oops when loading large images with firefox

2010-11-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31708 --- Comment #4 from Jerome Glisse gli...@freedesktop.org 2010-11-18 10:51:59 PST --- Created an attachment (id=40397) View: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=40397 Review:

[PATCH] drm/radeon/kms: forbid allocating bo bigger than VRAM or GTT (fdo 31708)

2010-11-18 Thread jglisse
From: Jerome Glisse jgli...@redhat.com Forbid allocating buffer bigger than VRAM or GTT, also properly set lpfn field of placement if VRAM is too small. Signed-off-by: Jerome Glisse jgli...@redhat.com --- drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h|2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.c |

[Bug 31708] kernel oops when loading large images with firefox

2010-11-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31708 --- Comment #5 from Manuel Lauss manuel.la...@gmail.com 2010-11-18 11:42:10 PST --- Thank you, the patch fixes the issue for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 31482] When trying to put the fullscreen window, data show and LCD laptop screen, the screen windwos screw up

2010-11-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31482 Maximiliano Castañón maxim...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[PATCH] drm/radeon/kms: fix i2c pad masks on rs4xx

2010-11-18 Thread alexdeucher
From: Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com These got lost in the last i2c cleanup. Fixes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23222 Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com Cc: sta...@kernel.org --- drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_combios.c | 13 + 1 files changed,

[Bug 29867] gallium r300g r600g broken shadows

2010-11-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29867 Michal Suchanek hramr...@centrum.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug 31732] X crashes with X: radeon_texture.c:682: radeon_store_teximage: Assertion `0' failed.

2010-11-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31732 --- Comment #3 from Alex Schuster wo...@wonkology.org 2010-11-18 15:11:25 PST --- Okay. I did not ever hera about this gallium stuff, but I see Gentoo has support for it, when I upgrade to mesa-8.9. So I did. Um, how can I see that gallium is

[Bug 31732] X crashes with X: radeon_texture.c:682: radeon_store_teximage: Assertion `0' failed.

2010-11-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31732 --- Comment #4 from Alex Deucher ag...@yahoo.com 2010-11-18 15:37:08 PST --- check the renderer string in glxinfo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

Re: [PATCH 0/7] BKL removal follow-up

2010-11-18 Thread Jan Kara
Hi, On Wed 17-11-10 16:26:52, Arnd Bergmann wrote: It seems the v4l and udf code has been worked out now and patches to kill the BKL there are finally making it upstream. As promised, here are the patches I did since the kernel summit to turn off the BKL by default. Given that -rc2 is out

2.6.37-rc2-git4: Reported regressions from 2.6.36

2010-11-18 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.36, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team. If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know. If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.36, please let us know either and we'll add

Re: [PATCH 0/7] BKL removal follow-up

2010-11-18 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Jan Kara j...@suse.cz wrote:  Just for info, UDF BKL removal patches seem to work fine but I want to give them some final SMP testing on Monday before pushing them to -next. I'm not sure how much people hurry with disabling the lock so if I should push them

Re: 2.6.37-rc2-git4: Reported regressions from 2.6.36

2010-11-18 Thread Alex Deucher
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote: This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.36, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team. If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know. If you know of any other

Re: 2.6.37-rc2-git4: Reported regressions 2.6.35 - 2.6.36

2010-11-18 Thread Jesse Gross
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote: Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20462 Subject         : 2.6.36-rc7-git2 - panic/GPF: e1000e/vlans? Submitter       : Nikola Ciprich extmaill...@linuxbox.cz Date            : 2010-10-15 7:10 (35

[git pull] drm fixes

2010-11-18 Thread Dave Airlie
Hi Linus, Just a fixes tree for -rc3 if possible, it did get rebased recently as I had to get the nouveau pull cleaned, but I'd been running the non-nouveau bits for a few days, there is also one late regression fix from Alex and some fixups after Jean pushed an i2c change that broke the kms

[Bug 31578] r600g: enforce minimum stride on render target texture images causes texture corruption on teapot demp.

2010-11-18 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31578 --- Comment #3 from Tilman Sauerbeck 2010-11-18 00:06:55 PST --- Retry with the tip of the master branch (and throw away the patch I posted). Commit a23f25eba1fb8919a29efb88ef9e351abcc65b2e should fix this. -- Configure bugmail:

[Bug 31667] r600c and r600g: wrong rendering for Savage2 game

2010-11-18 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31667 --- Comment #6 from T?r?k Edwin 2010-11-18 03:04:04 PST --- On mesa commit 185d862cd8cd0a56dd86daa01d9c692ff4abfb54 right now, and the horizontal black lines problem is fixed on r600g, the transparent character problem stays though. --

[Bug 31708] New: kernel oops when loading large images with firefox

2010-11-18 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31708 Summary: kernel oops when loading large images with firefox Product: DRI Version: XOrg CVS Platform: x86 (IA32) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Bug 31578] r600g: enforce minimum stride on render target texture images causes texture corruption on teapot demp.

2010-11-18 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31578 Andy Furniss changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 24818] shadowtex demo doesn't work on rs780

2010-11-18 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24818 --- Comment #11 from Andy Furniss 2010-11-18 04:43:04 PST --- (In reply to comment #9) > Good news, r600g doesn't have this bug! > Just tested mesa git c48ae0b6eddc71831ea0ea480a0177523ae6ee76, and shadowtex > looked fine. This has regressed

[Bug 31708] kernel oops when loading large images with firefox

2010-11-18 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31708 --- Comment #1 from Manuel Lauss 2010-11-18 04:47:29 PST --- When the BUG() in ttm_bo.c:1123 triggers, the values are as follows: bo->mem.num_pages = 16984, placement->lpfn =16384, placement->fpfn = 0 Hope that helps a bit. -- Configure

[Bug 31708] kernel oops when loading large images with firefox

2010-11-18 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31708 --- Comment #2 from Manuel Lauss 2010-11-18 05:07:36 PST --- I applied the following patch to the kernel; with it firefox loads and displays the image. diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c index

[PATCH] drm/radeon/kms: register an i2c adapter name for the dp aux bus

2010-11-18 Thread Jean Delvare
Hi Alex, On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 17:56:49 -0500, Alex Deucher wrote: > This causes the connector to not be added since i2c init fails > for the adapter. Fixes: > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31688 Good catch. It may seem to be a little harsh but I'm glad I added the check to

git repos, r600g prerequites

2010-11-18 Thread Marius Gröger
Hi, I find the various git repositories for drm sometimes a little confusing. For example, what is the difference between d-n and d-c-n? Maybe it would be a good idea to fill out the gitweb information for each each repository. Currently they all report "Unnamed repository; edit this file to

git repos, r600g prerequites

2010-11-18 Thread Jerome Glisse
2010/11/18 Marius Gr?ger : > Hi, > > I find the various git repositories for drm sometimes a little confusing. > For example, what is the difference between d-n and d-c-n? Maybe it would be > a good idea to fill out the gitweb information for each each repository. > Currently they all report

[PATCH] drm/radeon/kms: i2c s/sprintf/snprintf/g for safety

2010-11-18 Thread Alex Deucher
As per advice from Jean Delvare. Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher Cc: Jean Delvare --- drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_i2c.c |9 ++--- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_i2c.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_i2c.c index

[PATCH] drm/radeon/kms: i2c s/sprintf/snprintf/g for safety

2010-11-18 Thread Jean Delvare
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 11:37:18 -0500, Alex Deucher wrote: > As per advice from Jean Delvare. > > Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher > Cc: Jean Delvare Thanks Alex. Acked-by: Jean Delvare > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_i2c.c |9 ++--- > 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

[Bug 31400] [RV740] Mipmapping broken in drm-radeon-next / drm-next

2010-11-18 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31400 Alex Deucher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 30049] 2.6.36-rc3: divide by zero in radeon_crtc_scaling_mode_fixup

2010-11-18 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30049 Alex Deucher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 29738] SIGBUS after upgrade to 2.6.36-rc1-git4 [full stacktrace]

2010-11-18 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29738 --- Comment #24 from Alex Deucher 2010-11-18 10:13:34 PST --- This should be fixed in 2.6.36. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee

[Bug 29738] SIGBUS after upgrade to 2.6.36-rc1-git4 [full stacktrace]

2010-11-18 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29738 Alex Deucher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 29340] missing copy_from_user? radeon_info_ioctl

2010-11-18 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29340 Alex Deucher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 31732] X crashes with "X: radeon_texture.c:682: radeon_store_teximage: Assertion `0' failed."

2010-11-18 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31732 Alex Deucher changed: What|Removed |Added Product|xorg|Mesa Component|Driver/Radeon

[Bug 31667] r600c and r600g: wrong rendering for Savage2 game

2010-11-18 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31667 --- Comment #7 from T?r?k Edwin 2010-11-18 10:28:10 PST --- The missing character is a similar symptom to that of this bug for r300g which got fixed: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28517 Do you need the RADEON_DEBUG=vp logs (or

[Bug 31708] kernel oops when loading large images with firefox

2010-11-18 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31708 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Hellstr?m 2010-11-18 10:38:04 PST --- This looks like a radeon driver bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the

[Bug 31708] kernel oops when loading large images with firefox

2010-11-18 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31708 --- Comment #4 from Jerome Glisse 2010-11-18 10:51:59 PST --- Created an attachment (id=40397) View: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=40397 Review: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/review?bug=31708=40397 Forbid big bo allcoation

[PATCH] drm/radeon/kms: forbid allocating bo bigger than VRAM or GTT (fdo 31708)

2010-11-18 Thread jgli...@redhat.com
From: Jerome Glisse Forbid allocating buffer bigger than VRAM or GTT, also properly set lpfn field of placement if VRAM is too small. Signed-off-by: Jerome Glisse --- drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h|2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.c | 19

[Bug 31708] kernel oops when loading large images with firefox

2010-11-18 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31708 --- Comment #5 from Manuel Lauss 2010-11-18 11:42:10 PST --- Thank you, the patch fixes the issue for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are

[Bug 31482] When trying to put the fullscreen window, data show and LCD laptop screen, the screen windwos screw up

2010-11-18 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31482 Maximiliano Casta??n changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[PATCH] drm/radeon/kms: fix i2c pad masks on rs4xx

2010-11-18 Thread alexdeuc...@gmail.com
From: Alex Deucher These got lost in the last i2c cleanup. Fixes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23222 Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher Cc: stable at kernel.org --- drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_combios.c | 13 + 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+),

[Bug 29867] gallium r300g r600g broken shadows

2010-11-18 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29867 Michal Suchanek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 31732] X crashes with "X: radeon_texture.c:682: radeon_store_teximage: Assertion `0' failed."

2010-11-18 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31732 --- Comment #3 from Alex Schuster 2010-11-18 15:11:25 PST --- Okay. I did not ever hera about this gallium stuff, but I see Gentoo has support for it, when I upgrade to mesa-8.9. So I did. Um, how can I see that gallium is really active? I do

[Bug 31732] X crashes with "X: radeon_texture.c:682: radeon_store_teximage: Assertion `0' failed."

2010-11-18 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31732 --- Comment #4 from Alex Deucher 2010-11-18 15:37:08 PST --- check the renderer string in glxinfo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the

[PATCH 0/7] BKL removal follow-up

2010-11-18 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Jan Kara wrote: > > ?Just for info, UDF BKL removal patches seem to work fine but I want to > give them some final SMP testing on Monday before pushing them to -next. > I'm not sure how much people hurry with disabling the lock so if I should > push them ASAP or

2.6.37-rc2-git4: Reported regressions from 2.6.36

2010-11-18 Thread Alex Deucher
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.36, > for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team. > If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know. > > If you know of any other

2.6.37-rc2-git4: Reported regressions 2.6.35 -> 2.6.36

2010-11-18 Thread Jesse Gross
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Bug-Entry ? ? ? : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20462 > Subject ? ? ? ? : 2.6.36-rc7-git2 - panic/GPF: e1000e/vlans? > Submitter ? ? ? : Nikola Ciprich > Date ? ? ? ? ? ?: 2010-10-15 7:10 (35 days old) > Message-ID ? ? ?:

[Bug 31732] X crashes with "X: radeon_texture.c:682: radeon_store_teximage: Assertion `0' failed."

2010-11-18 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31732 --- Comment #5 from Alex Schuster 2010-11-18 16:42:16 PST --- Okay, so it is not active:"OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI R600 (RS780 9610) 20090101 TCL". No gallium in there. Do I have to activate it? Or is it a matter of compile options? I

[Bug 31499] [r300g] KWin Lanczos filter problems - Black Windows using effects

2010-11-18 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31499 --- Comment #2 from Tom Stellard 2010-11-18 23:45:16 PST --- It looks like some of the KDE devs have identified the failing shader as the Lanczos filter. It would be helpful if you could attach the Lanczos filter GLSL code along with the

2.6.37-rc2-git4: Reported regressions 2.6.35 -> 2.6.36

2010-11-18 Thread Mark Lord
On 10-11-18 06:50 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message contains a list of some post-2.6.35 regressions introduced before > 2.6.36, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking > team. > If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know. > > If you know of any