https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211649
--- Comment #5 from Nicholas Kazlauskas (nicholas.kazlaus...@amd.com) ---
It would be good to know what OS/Userspace this is, I don't think I've seen
anything that has atomic check failures on nearly every flip, eg:
[ 179.142898] [drm:amdgpu_dm_
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211649
--- Comment #6 from youling...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 295193
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=295193&action=edit
amdgpu_dm_dtn_log
I using amd 3400g running on androidx86 7 with mesa21.0
cat /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/a
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211649
--- Comment #7 from Nicholas Kazlauskas (nicholas.kazlaus...@amd.com) ---
That makes more sense then, that's the behavior I'd expect on CrOS/Android.
Also explains why we haven't seen this on X/Wayland based compositors like
GNOME on Ubuntu.
One
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211649
--- Comment #8 from youling...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Nicholas Kazlauskas from comment #7)
> That makes more sense then, that's the behavior I'd expect on CrOS/Android.
>
> Also explains why we haven't seen this on X/Wayland based compositors
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211649
--- Comment #9 from youling...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 295197
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=295197&action=edit
dmesg.txt
I delete "read -n 1", can output dmesg.txt and trace.txt.
trace.txt,
# tracer: function
#
# en
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211649
--- Comment #10 from Nicholas Kazlauskas (nicholas.kazlaus...@amd.com) ---
I don't expect the trace log to be completely empty.
You'll need to leave the trace log running after enabling it as well (with
tracing on/trace).
You'll also need variou
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211649
--- Comment #11 from youling...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 295201
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=295201&action=edit
trace.txt
cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You a
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211649
--- Comment #12 from Nicholas Kazlauskas (nicholas.kazlaus...@amd.com) ---
Thanks, this was what I'm looking for.
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
__
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211651
Artem S. Tashkinov (a...@gmx.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Reso
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206987
Jan Kokemüller (jan.kokemuel...@gmail.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jan.kokemuel.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211651
--- Comment #4 from fily1212 (ker...@fily.com.de) ---
Thank you for your reply.
Are we sure that this is outside of control of the kernel, since it works with
Kernel 5.3 and not with 5.8 and later, same drivers?
Best,
Filippo
--
You may reply
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206987
--- Comment #40 from Alex Deucher (alexdeuc...@gmail.com) ---
(In reply to Jan Kokemüller from comment #39)
> Created attachment 295225 [details]
> Call DC_FP_START() / DC_FP_END() in dcn21_validate_bandwidth
>
> Could it be that DC_FP_START()/DC
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206987
--- Comment #41 from Jan Kokemüller (jan.kokemuel...@gmail.com) ---
> Looks correct. Care to send out a proper git patch?
Thank you for having a look at the patch! I've sent it to the amd-gfx list.
--
You may reply to this email to add a comme
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211717
Bug ID: 211717
Summary: WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 430 at
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/clk_mgr/dcn21
/rn_clk_mgr.c:833 rn_clk_mgr_construct+0x2dd/0x440
[amdgp
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=210849
--- Comment #17 from JerryD (jvdeli...@charter.net) ---
Possible fixed in this commit:
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/a81bfdf8bf5396824d7d139560180854cb599b06
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211425
--- Comment #7 from Andreas (icedragon...@web.de) ---
OK, I could successfully bisect the right point.
- last good kernel version was 5.8.18 (latest 5.8.)
- first bad kernel version was 5.9.0 until latest 5.10.16!
On the kernel 5.4 until 5.8.18 I
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211425
Andreas (icedragon...@web.de) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Kernel Version|5.10.14 |5.10.16
Regressio
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201957
slidercrank (playdohc...@gmail.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||playdohc...@gmail.co
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211745
Bug ID: 211745
Summary: Latest 5.11 git doesn't boot.
Product: Drivers
Version: 2.5
Kernel Version: linux-git-5.11rc7.r141.g358feceebbf6
Hardware: x86-64
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211745
--- Comment #1 from Robert M. Muncrief (rmuncr...@humanavance.com) ---
Created attachment 295273
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=295273&action=edit
Good Xorg
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211745
--- Comment #2 from Robert M. Muncrief (rmuncr...@humanavance.com) ---
Created attachment 295275
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=295275&action=edit
Good journalctl
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are rec
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211745
--- Comment #3 from Robert M. Muncrief (rmuncr...@humanavance.com) ---
Created attachment 295277
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=295277&action=edit
Bad dmesg
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211745
--- Comment #4 from Robert M. Muncrief (rmuncr...@humanavance.com) ---
Created attachment 295279
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=295279&action=edit
Bad Xorg
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211745
--- Comment #5 from Robert M. Muncrief (rmuncr...@humanavance.com) ---
Created attachment 295281
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=295281&action=edit
Bad journalctl
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are rece
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211745
--- Comment #6 from Robert M. Muncrief (rmuncr...@humanavance.com) ---
I forgot to include the full git kernel name. It's
linux-git-5.11rc7.r141.g358feceebbf6
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211745
Alex Deucher (alexdeuc...@gmail.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alexdeuc...@gmail.c
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211425
--- Comment #8 from Alex Deucher (alexdeuc...@gmail.com) ---
Can you narrow down the specific commit?
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/admin-guide/bug-bisect.html
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211649
--- Comment #13 from Alex Deucher (alexdeuc...@gmail.com) ---
See also:
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/1487
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211745
--- Comment #8 from Robert M. Muncrief (rmuncr...@humanavance.com) ---
(In reply to Alex Deucher from comment #7)
> Can you bisect?
I can bisect, but I updated and compiled linux-mainline with the final 5.11
from the Arch AUR this morning and m
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211745
--- Comment #9 from Alex Deucher (alexdeuc...@gmail.com) ---
Only reporters can close kernel bugs. Please close if this is not an issue.
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211745
Robert M. Muncrief (rmuncr...@humanavance.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=197327
Shixin Zeng (zeng.shi...@gmail.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zeng.shi...@gmail.co
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=209713
Erik Quaeghebeur (kernelb...@equaeghe.nospammail.net) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ke
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211425
--- Comment #9 from Andreas (icedragon...@web.de) ---
This was my first patch bisection - after 14 rebuilds and reboots it says:
9555152beb1143c85c03f9b9de59863cbbe89f4b is the first bad commit
commit 9555152beb1143c85c03f9b9de59863cbbe89f4b
Merg
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211807
Bug ID: 211807
Summary: [drm:drm_dp_mst_dpcd_read] *ERROR* mstb
4e6288dd port 3: DPCD read on addr 0x60 for 1
bytes NAKed
Product: Drivers
Version: 2.5
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203905
m11.1l1@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m11.1l1@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203905
--- Comment #24 from m11.1l1@gmail.com ---
Related to the previous post:
https://www.linux.org/threads/failed-to-start-load-save-screen-backlight-brightness-of-amdgpu_bl1.31998/#post-113058
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211649
Eric Samuelson (e...@samuelson.no) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||e...@samuelson.no
--
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211501
wychuchol (wychuchol7...@gmail.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wychuchol7...@gmail.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211425
Andreas (icedragon...@web.de) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Kernel Version|5.10.16 |5.10.17 and 5.11.0
--- Co
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201497
--- Comment #23 from chrisk...@goldmail.de ---
Update:
We are now at Kernel 5.11 and this problem is still not fixed. I am stuck at
5.8 + manually entering the EDID on startup.
When 5.8 gets too outdated for me, I will buy a new monitor. I guess w
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211501
--- Comment #4 from Jasen Borisov (borisovja...@protonmail.com) ---
I suspect you might be experiencing a different bug from mine, because in my
case the kernel recovers after some time and everything is back in a usable
state.
There could be man
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211277
--- Comment #9 from kolAflash (kolafl...@kolahilft.de) ---
I'm on Linux-5.7 now since 2021-01-26.
And I woke up the notebook at least once a day since then.
So it's clearly a regression in the kernel somewhere between 5.7 and 5.10 and
probably bet
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211875
Bug ID: 211875
Summary: CPU frequency scaling lost after "WARNING: CPU: 2 PID:
2358578 at
smu8_send_msg_to_smc_with_parameter+0xfe/0x140
[amdgpu]"
Produc
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211875
--- Comment #1 from Erhard F. (erhar...@mailbox.org) ---
Created attachment 295383
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=295383&action=edit
kernel .config (kernel 5.11, A10-9700E)
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
Y
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211277
Alex Deucher (alexdeuc...@gmail.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alexdeuc...@gmail.c
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211875
--- Comment #2 from Erhard F. (erhar...@mailbox.org) ---
[ cut here ]
smu8_send_msg_to_smc_with_parameter(0x0011, 0x460) timed out after 3236309 us
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 403 at smu8_send_msg_to_smc_with_parameter+0xfe/0x140
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=209713
--- Comment #16 from Oliver Reeh (oli...@diereehs.de) ---
Looks like this is fixed in 5.11.0 and 5.11.1.
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=209713
--- Comment #17 from Lahfa Samy (s...@lahfa.xyz) ---
> Looks like this is fixed in 5.11.0 and 5.11.1.
I'm still getting this issue reliably under kernel 5.11.1 when resuming from
suspended state.(In reply to Oliver Reeh from comment #16)
So I con
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=209713
--- Comment #18 from Lahfa Samy (s...@lahfa.xyz) ---
Created attachment 295425
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=295425&action=edit
Trace after resume from S3 state on 5.11.1
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
Yo
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211649
--- Comment #15 from Alex Deucher (alexdeuc...@gmail.com) ---
Reverted:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=efc8278eecfd5e6fa36c5d41e71d038f534fe107
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211277
--- Comment #11 from kolAflash (kolafl...@kolahilft.de) ---
(In reply to Alex Deucher from comment #10)
> Can you bisect?
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/admin-guide/bug-bisect.html
I will try to.
But it will definitely need some time
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=209713
--- Comment #19 from Klaus Mueller (kmuel...@justmail.de) ---
I didn't see any problem any more since 2021-02-14 and linux 5.10.16 with this
patch applied:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git/tree/releases/5.9.1
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211981
Bug ID: 211981
Summary: AMDGPU: without cable attached videocard shuts down
and does wake up again, log prints "[drm] Cannot find
any crtc or sizes"
Product: Drivers
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211981
raul (raulvior@gmail.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|AMDGPU: without cable |AMDGPU: without cable
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211425
Andreas (icedragon...@web.de) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Kernel Version|5.10.17 and 5.11.0 |5.11.2
Severity
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51381
Luca T. (luca.trom...@gmail.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||luca.trom...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211997
Bug ID: 211997
Summary: sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-5.11.2 crash upon disconnect
HDMI monitor AMDGPU
Product: Drivers
Version: 2.5
Kernel Version: 5.11.2-gentoo
Hardware:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211997
--- Comment #1 from Stefan de Konink (ste...@konink.de) ---
5.10.5-gentoo still works for me. Have not checked the other releases.
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assign
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201957
Fice (f...@inbox.ru) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||f...@inbox.ru
--- Comment #46 from
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211997
Paul Menzel (pmenzel+bugzilla.kernel@molgen.mpg.de) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208115
--- Comment #3 from Adarion from userland (h_mailingli...@posteo.de) ---
A little (and very late, sorry, but I have a v. stressful "real life") update
from my side.
I recently found the time to plug the RX 590 back into the Zen+ setup. (was
runni
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=209713
--- Comment #20 from Oliver Reeh (oli...@diereehs.de) ---
Still no problem here with the 5.11.x kernels.
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212019
Bug ID: 212019
Summary: [drm:drm_atomic_helper_wait_for_flip_done
[drm_kms_helper]] *ERROR* [CRTC:67:crtc-0] flip_done
timed out
Product: Drivers
Version: 2.5
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212019
--- Comment #1 from Fruhwirth Clemens (clem...@endorphin.org) ---
Created attachment 295571
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=295571&action=edit
kernel log
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving thi
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211875
--- Comment #3 from Erhard F. (erhar...@mailbox.org) ---
Created attachment 295573
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=295573&action=edit
kernel .config (kernel 5.12-rc1, A10-9700E)
Same for kernel v5.12-rc1. Backtrace looks sligh
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211981
Alex Deucher (alexdeuc...@gmail.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alexdeuc...@gmail.c
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211875
Alex Deucher (alexdeuc...@gmail.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alexdeuc...@gmail.c
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211875
--- Comment #5 from Erhard F. (erhar...@mailbox.org) ---
I don't know. This is a new machine and have seen this since 5.10.x which was
the first kernel I tried on it.
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211981
--- Comment #2 from raul (raulvior@gmail.com) ---
(In reply to Alex Deucher from comment #1)
> Does setting amdgpu.runpm=0 fix it?
Yes, it does.
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211997
Stefan de Konink (ste...@konink.de) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Re
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211997
--- Comment #4 from Paul Menzel (pmenzel+bugzilla.kernel@molgen.mpg.de) ---
Thank you for updating the status. Can you please mark it as a duplicate of bug
#211649 [1].
[1]: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211649
--
You may repl
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211649
Paul Menzel (pmenzel+bugzilla.kernel@molgen.mpg.de) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211649
--- Comment #17 from Alex Deucher (alexdeuc...@gmail.com) ---
(In reply to Paul Menzel from comment #16)
> Can this bug be closed then?
Only the person that opens the bug can close it, but yes, it can be closed.
--
You may reply to this email t
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211649
youling...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211649
Stefan de Konink (ste...@konink.de) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ste...@konink.de
--
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211997
Stefan de Konink (ste...@konink.de) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|PATCH_ALREADY_AVAILABLE |DUPLICATE
--- Comme
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=209457
Sven Neumann (ker...@svenfoo.org) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ker...@svenfoo.org
--
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211277
--- Comment #12 from kolAflash (kolafl...@kolahilft.de) ---
I've tried doing a bisect using this script. Unfortunately I couldn't reproduce
the bug this way. So I bisecting will take a lot longer.
for i in {0..19}; do
echo -e "\n${i}"
/usr/sb
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211277
--- Comment #13 from Jerome C (m...@jeromec.com) ---
(In reply to kolAflash from comment #12)
> I've tried doing a bisect using this script. Unfortunately I couldn't
> reproduce the bug this way. So I bisecting will take a lot longer.
>
> for i i
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=209457
--- Comment #21 from Alex Deucher (alexdeuc...@gmail.com) ---
Unless you have a polaris board please file your own bug.
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the b
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212077
Bug ID: 212077
Summary: AMD GPU at highest frequency even not in use
Product: Drivers
Version: 2.5
Kernel Version: 5.11.3
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Tree: Mainli
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212077
Bat Malin (bat_ma...@abv.bg) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|AMD GPU at highest |AMD GPU discrete card
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212077
Bat Malin (bat_ma...@abv.bg) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|AMD GPU discrete card |AMD GPU discrete card
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212077
--- Comment #1 from Bat Malin (bat_ma...@abv.bg) ---
Created attachment 295679
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=295679&action=edit
Picture of memory status
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212077
Alex Deucher (alexdeuc...@gmail.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alexdeuc...@gmail.c
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211033
Jan Klos (honza.k...@gmail.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||honza.k...@gmail.com
--
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211425
Andreas (icedragon...@web.de) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Kernel Version|5.11.2 |5.11.3
Severity
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212077
Bat Malin (bat_ma...@abv.bg) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolutio
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211277
--- Comment #14 from kolAflash (kolafl...@kolahilft.de) ---
(In reply to Jerome C from comment #13)
I don't get how you got to your results.
There's no straight path from 5.10.4 to 5.11-rc5, as they are on different
branches (5.10.y and master).
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212107
Bug ID: 212107
Summary: Temperature increase by 15°C on radeon gpu
Product: Drivers
Version: 2.5
Kernel Version: 5.11
Hardware: x86-64
OS: Linux
Tree: Mainlin
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212107
--- Comment #1 from Martin (martin...@gmx.com) ---
Created attachment 295703
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=295703&action=edit
kernel config
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail becau
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212109
Bug ID: 212109
Summary: Analogix ANX6345 bridge fails to initialize after
suspend
Product: Drivers
Version: 2.5
Kernel Version: 5.11.4
Hardware: ARM
OS:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212109
Jaron Kent-Dobias (ja...@kent-dobias.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ja...@kent-dob
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212109
--- Comment #1 from Jaron Kent-Dobias (ja...@kent-dobias.com) ---
Created attachment 295707
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=295707&action=edit
dmesg log ending immediately after bug in question
--
You may reply to this email
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212109
--- Comment #2 from Jaron Kent-Dobias (ja...@kent-dobias.com) ---
Additional information: the 5.10 and 5.11 series appear to attempt different
suspends: the 5.10 enters "s2idle" suspend, while the 5.11 enters "deep"
suspend.
--
You may reply to
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212107
Dieter Nützel (die...@nuetzel-hh.de) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||die...@nuetzel-hh.d
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=210849
--- Comment #18 from JerryD (jvdeli...@charter.net) ---
(In reply to JerryD from comment #17)
> Possible fixed in this commit:
>
> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/
> a81bfdf8bf5396824d7d139560180854cb599b06
No noy fixed. I ahve tried u
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211425
Andreas (icedragon...@web.de) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Kernel Version|5.11.3 |5.11.4
--
You may reply
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212107
--- Comment #3 from Martin (martin...@gmx.com) ---
(In reply to Dieter Nützel from comment #2)
> It could be the ZeroCore thing, which has finally landed with 5.11.
> Please verify, that your gfx fans stopped with 5.11 and running with all
> kerne
301 - 400 of 44706 matches
Mail list logo