Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

-reviews/jtpHvZOfZ-Q). It is important to similarly include in the mainline and stable kernels to facilitate various distros that are now raising bug reports (for example: https://bugs.launchpad.net/intel/+bug/1760545). Many thanks, Ian On Sun, 22 Apr 2018 at 08:46, Ian W MORRISON <ianwmo

Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

On 21 April 2018 at 11:22, Botello Ortega, Luis wrote: > Hi all: > > We tested GLK DMC 1.04 FW in last week of September 2017, using the latest > drm-tip version for that time (4.14.0-rc2) and according to our results we > could declare this FW as acceptable and

Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

On 20 April 2018 at 17:50, Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > On Fri, 20 Apr 2018, Ian W MORRISON <ianwmorri...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I've performed backport testing and some additional analysis as follows: > > What testing did you do beyond booting? Did

Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

t;From: Jani Nikula [mailto:jani.nik...@linux.intel.com] >> >>Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 5:27 AM >> >>To: Ian W MORRISON <ianwmorri...@gmail.com> >> >>Cc: Vivi, Rodrigo <rodrigo.v...@intel.com>; Srivatsa, Anusha >> >><anusha.sri

Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

On 11 April 2018 at 22:27, Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, Ian W MORRISON <ianwmorri...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>> >>> NAK on indiscriminate Cc: stable. There are zero guarantees that older >>> kern

Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

> > NAK on indiscriminate Cc: stable. There are zero guarantees that older > kernels will work with whatever firmware you throw at them. > I included 'Cc: stable' so the patch would get added to the v4.16 and v4.15 kernels which I have tested with the patch. I found that earlier kernels didn't