Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH RFC 2/5] cgroup: Add mechanism to register vendor specific DRM devices

2018-12-05 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
is highly appreciated. > >>>> > >>>> Best Regards, > >>>> Harish > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> From: amd-gfx on behalf of Tejun > >>>> Heo > >>>> Sent: Tuesd

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH RFC 2/5] cgroup: Add mechanism to register vendor specific DRM devices

2018-12-03 Thread Kuehling, Felix
ciated. >>>> >>>> Best Regards, >>>> Harish >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> From: amd-gfx on behalf of Tejun >>>> Heo >>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2018 5:30 PM >>>> To: Ho, Kenny >>>

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH RFC 2/5] cgroup: Add mechanism to register vendor specific DRM devices

2018-12-03 Thread Matt Roper
gt; > > > Your feedback is highly appreciated. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > > > > Harish > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH RFC 2/5] cgroup: Add mechanism to register vendor specific DRM devices

2018-12-02 Thread Ho, Kenny
> Your feedback is highly appreciated. > > > > > > > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > > > Harish > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Fro

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH RFC 2/5] cgroup: Add mechanism to register vendor specific DRM devices

2018-11-30 Thread Matt Roper
t; > > > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > > Harish > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: amd-gfx on behalf of > > > > > Tejun Heo > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 20

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH RFC 2/5] cgroup: Add mechanism to register vendor specific DRM devices

2018-11-28 Thread Ho, Kenny
> > > > > > > > > > > From: amd-gfx on behalf of > > > > Tejun Heo > > > > Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2018 5:30 PM > > > > To: Ho, Kenny > > > > Cc: cgro...@vger.kernel.org; intel-...@lists.freedesktop.org;

RE: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH RFC 2/5] cgroup: Add mechanism to register vendor specific DRM devices

2018-11-28 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
gt; > > Heo > > > Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2018 5:30 PM > > > To: Ho, Kenny > > > Cc: cgro...@vger.kernel.org; intel-...@lists.freedesktop.org; > > > y2ke...@gmail.com; amd-...@lists.freedesktop.org; > > > dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > > > Subj

RE: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH RFC 2/5] cgroup: Add mechanism to register vendor specific DRM devices

2018-11-27 Thread Ho, Kenny
m: amd-gfx on behalf of Tejun > > Heo > > Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2018 5:30 PM > > To: Ho, Kenny > > Cc: cgro...@vger.kernel.org; intel-...@lists.freedesktop.org; > > y2ke...@gmail.com; amd-...@lists.freedesktop.org; > > dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH RFC 2/5] cgroup: Add mechanism to register vendor specific DRM devices

2018-11-27 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
el.org; intel-...@lists.freedesktop.org; > y2ke...@gmail.com; amd-...@lists.freedesktop.org; > dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/5] cgroup: Add mechanism to register vendor > specific DRM devices >   > > Hello, > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at

Re: [PATCH RFC 2/5] cgroup: Add mechanism to register vendor specific DRM devices

2018-11-27 Thread Koenig, Christian
reedesktop.org; > dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/5] cgroup: Add mechanism to register vendor > specific DRM devices > > > Hello, > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 10:21:14PM +, Ho, Kenny wrote: >> By this reply, are you suggesting that

Re: [PATCH RFC 2/5] cgroup: Add mechanism to register vendor specific DRM devices

2018-11-26 Thread Kasiviswanathan, Harish
: [PATCH RFC 2/5] cgroup: Add mechanism to register vendor specific DRM devices   Hello, On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 10:21:14PM +, Ho, Kenny wrote: > By this reply, are you suggesting that vendor specific resources > will never be acceptable to be managed under cgroup?  Let say a user I wo

Re: [PATCH RFC 2/5] cgroup: Add mechanism to register vendor specific DRM devices

2018-11-21 Thread Ho, Kenny
(resending because previous email switched to HTML mode and was filtered out) Hi Tejun, On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 5:30 PM Tejun Heo wrote: > On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 10:21:14PM +, Ho, Kenny wrote: > > By this reply, are you suggesting that vendor specific resources > > will never be acceptable

Re: [PATCH RFC 2/5] cgroup: Add mechanism to register vendor specific DRM devices

2018-11-21 Thread Ho, Kenny
Hi Tejun, On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 5:30 PM Tejun Heo wrote: > On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 10:21:14PM +, Ho, Kenny wrote: > > By this reply, are you suggesting that vendor specific resources > > will never be acceptable to be managed under cgroup? Let say a user > > I wouldn't say never but

Re: [PATCH RFC 2/5] cgroup: Add mechanism to register vendor specific DRM devices

2018-11-21 Thread Christian König
Am 20.11.18 um 19:58 schrieb Kenny Ho: Since many parts of the DRM subsystem has vendor-specific implementations, we introduce mechanisms for vendor to register their specific resources and control files to the DRM cgroup subsystem. A vendor will register itself with the DRM cgroup subsystem

Re: [PATCH RFC 2/5] cgroup: Add mechanism to register vendor specific DRM devices

2018-11-20 Thread Tejun Heo
Hello, On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 10:21:14PM +, Ho, Kenny wrote: > By this reply, are you suggesting that vendor specific resources > will never be acceptable to be managed under cgroup? Let say a user I wouldn't say never but whatever which gets included as a cgroup controller should have

RE: [PATCH RFC 2/5] cgroup: Add mechanism to register vendor specific DRM devices

2018-11-20 Thread Ho, Kenny
Hi Tejun, Thanks for the reply. A few clarifying questions: On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 3:21 PM Tejun Heo wrote: > So, I'm still pretty negative about adding drm controller at this > point. There isn't enough of common resource model defined yet and > until that gets sorted out I think it's in

Re: [PATCH RFC 2/5] cgroup: Add mechanism to register vendor specific DRM devices

2018-11-20 Thread Tejun Heo
Hello, On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 01:58:11PM -0500, Kenny Ho wrote: > Since many parts of the DRM subsystem has vendor-specific > implementations, we introduce mechanisms for vendor to register their > specific resources and control files to the DRM cgroup subsystem. A > vendor will register itself

[PATCH RFC 2/5] cgroup: Add mechanism to register vendor specific DRM devices

2018-11-20 Thread Kenny Ho
Since many parts of the DRM subsystem has vendor-specific implementations, we introduce mechanisms for vendor to register their specific resources and control files to the DRM cgroup subsystem. A vendor will register itself with the DRM cgroup subsystem first before registering individual DRM