On 03.06.2019 16:21, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King
>
> The less than check for the variable num_lanes is always going to be
> false because the variable is a u32. Fix this by making num_lanes an
> int and also make loop index i an int too.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Unsigned compared
On 07/06/2019 10:41, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> On 03.06.2019 16:21, Colin King wrote:
>> From: Colin Ian King
>>
>> The less than check for the variable num_lanes is always going to be
>> false because the variable is a u32. Fix this by making num_lanes an
>> int and also make loop index i an int
On 03.06.2019 16:21, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King
>
> The less than check for the variable num_lanes is always going to be
> false because the variable is a u32. Fix this by making num_lanes an
> int and also make loop index i an int too.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Unsigned compared
On 03/06/2019 17:21, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King
>
> The less than check for the variable num_lanes is always going to be
> false because the variable is a u32. Fix this by making num_lanes an
> int and also make loop index i an int too.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Unsigned compared
From: Colin Ian King
The less than check for the variable num_lanes is always going to be
false because the variable is a u32. Fix this by making num_lanes an
int and also make loop index i an int too.
Addresses-Coverity: ("Unsigned compared against 0")
Fixes: ff5781634c41 ("drm/bridge:
