Hi John,
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 5:51 AM John Hubbard wrote:
>
> This needs to go through Andrew's -mm tree, due to adding a new gup.c
> routine. However, I would really love to have some testing from the
> drm/i915 folks, because I haven't been able to run-time test that part
> of it.
>
>
On 2020-05-22 04:40, Souptick Joarder wrote:
...
3) Make it easy for an upcoming patch from Souptick, which aims to
convert __get_user_pages_fast() to use a gup_flags argument, instead
of a bool writeable arg. Also, if this series looks good, we can
ask Souptick to change the name
On 2020-05-21 12:11, John Hubbard wrote:
On 2020-05-21 11:57, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting John Hubbard (2020-05-19 01:21:20)
This needs to go through Andrew's -mm tree, due to adding a new gup.c
routine. However, I would really love to have some testing from the
drm/i915 folks, because I
On 2020-05-21 11:57, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting John Hubbard (2020-05-19 01:21:20)
This needs to go through Andrew's -mm tree, due to adding a new gup.c
routine. However, I would really love to have some testing from the
drm/i915 folks, because I haven't been able to run-time test that part
of
Quoting John Hubbard (2020-05-19 01:21:20)
> This needs to go through Andrew's -mm tree, due to adding a new gup.c
> routine. However, I would really love to have some testing from the
> drm/i915 folks, because I haven't been able to run-time test that part
> of it.
CI hit
<4> [185.667750]
This needs to go through Andrew's -mm tree, due to adding a new gup.c
routine. However, I would really love to have some testing from the
drm/i915 folks, because I haven't been able to run-time test that part
of it.
Otherwise, though, the series has passed my basic run time testing:
some LTP
