2017년 11월 03일 23:03에 Emil Velikov 이(가) 쓴 글:
> On 3 November 2017 at 13:59, Tobias Jakobi
> wrote:
>> Inki Dae wrote:
>>> Hi Email,
>>>
>>> Since I posted this patch, much time has been passed.
>>> But no answer. We got already many Acked-by so could you merge this patch?
>> I think you need Acke
2017년 08월 11일 00:48에 Jan Vesely 이(가) 쓴 글:
> On Thu, 2017-08-10 at 13:52 +0900, Inki Dae wrote:
>> Chnage GPL license of Exynos relevant code to X11/MIT.
>>
>> I'd like to keep license consistency to all Exynos code
>> because License checker notices two more licenses exist
>> in libdrm.
>>
>> For
Hi Tobias,
Really sorry for late and no checking for your comment.
2017년 08월 10일 20:23에 Tobias Jakobi 이(가) 쓴 글:
> Hello,
>
> some comments first.
>
> - What is this license checker and why should we care about it?
We are developing Linux platform which uses libdrm open source. And when this
p
On 3 November 2017 at 13:59, Tobias Jakobi
wrote:
> Inki Dae wrote:
>> Hi Email,
>>
>> Since I posted this patch, much time has been passed.
>> But no answer. We got already many Acked-by so could you merge this patch?
> I think you need Acked-by by all authors. And it looks like you ignored my
>
Inki Dae wrote:
> Hi Email,
>
> Since I posted this patch, much time has been passed.
> But no answer. We got already many Acked-by so could you merge this patch?
I think you need Acked-by by all authors. And it looks like you ignored my
comments.
- Tobias
>
> Thanks,
> Inki Dae
>
>
> 2017년
Hi Email,
Since I posted this patch, much time has been passed.
But no answer. We got already many Acked-by so could you merge this patch?
Thanks,
Inki Dae
2017년 08월 10일 13:52에 Inki Dae 이(가) 쓴 글:
> Chnage GPL license of Exynos relevant code to X11/MIT.
>
> I'd like to keep license consistency
On Thu, 2017-08-10 at 13:52 +0900, Inki Dae wrote:
> Chnage GPL license of Exynos relevant code to X11/MIT.
>
> I'd like to keep license consistency to all Exynos code
> because License checker notices two more licenses exist
> in libdrm.
>
> For the license change I need to get your agree - all
Hello,
some comments first.
- What is this license checker and why should we care about it?
- If multiple licenses are really the problem, we could also change it to GPLv3.
But you want to change it to X11/MIT, so you should clarify this particular
choice. You kinda did this in [1], but it's tota
Chnage GPL license of Exynos relevant code to X11/MIT.
I'd like to keep license consistency to all Exynos code
because License checker notices two more licenses exist
in libdrm.
For the license change I need to get your agree - all committers.
So please give me Acked-by if you agree with me.
Sig