Thanks Eric!
On 2016-05-10 01:06 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> Robert Foss writes:
>
>> On 2016-05-03 03:22 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
>>> robert.foss at collabora.com writes:
>>>
From: Robert Foss
As per the documentation in drm_crtc.h, atomic_commit should return
-EBUSY if an
On 2016-05-03 03:22 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> robert.foss at collabora.com writes:
>
>> From: Robert Foss
>>
>> As per the documentation in drm_crtc.h, atomic_commit should return
>> -EBUSY if an asycnhronous update is requested and there is an earlier
>> update pending.
>>
>> Note: docs cited
Robert Foss writes:
> On 2016-05-03 03:22 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
>> robert.foss at collabora.com writes:
>>
>>> From: Robert Foss
>>>
>>> As per the documentation in drm_crtc.h, atomic_commit should return
>>> -EBUSY if an asycnhronous update is requested and there is an earlier
>>> update
From: Robert Foss
As per the documentation in drm_crtc.h, atomic_commit should return
-EBUSY if an asycnhronous update is requested and there is an earlier
update pending.
Note: docs cited here are drm_crtc.h, and the whole quote is:
* - -EBUSY, if an
robert.foss at collabora.com writes:
> From: Robert Foss
>
> As per the documentation in drm_crtc.h, atomic_commit should return
> -EBUSY if an asycnhronous update is requested and there is an earlier
> update pending.
>
> Note: docs cited here are drm_crtc.h, and the whole quote is:
>
> *