On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 02:21:53AM +0200, Andi Shyti wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> > > -static inline struct intel_pxp *i915_dev_to_pxp(struct device *i915_kdev)
> > > +static struct intel_pxp *i915_dev_to_pxp(struct device *i915_kdev)
> >
> > Was dropping the inline here intentional? It doesn't seem
Hi Matt,
> > -static inline struct intel_pxp *i915_dev_to_pxp(struct device *i915_kdev)
> > +static struct intel_pxp *i915_dev_to_pxp(struct device *i915_kdev)
>
> Was dropping the inline here intentional? It doesn't seem like there's
> any reason to drop it, and if it was intentional the
On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 03:25:09PM +0200, Andi Shyti wrote:
> Use to_gt() helper consistently throughout the codebase.
> Pure mechanical s/i915->gt/to_gt(i915). No functional changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp_tee.c | 6 --
> 1 file changed, 4
Use to_gt() helper consistently throughout the codebase.
Pure mechanical s/i915->gt/to_gt(i915). No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp_tee.c | 6 --
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
