> On 27/06/2023 14:28, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Tue, 09 May 2023, fei.y...@intel.com wrote:
>>> From: Fei Yang
>>>
>>> This patch is a preparation for replacing enum i915_cache_level with
>>> PAT index. Caching policy for buffer objects is set through the PAT
>>> index in PTE, the old
> Hi Jani and Tvrtko,
>
This patch is a preparation for replacing enum i915_cache_level with PAT
index. Caching policy for buffer objects is set through the PAT index in
PTE, the old i915_cache_level is not sufficient to represent all caching
modes supported by the hardware.
On Tue, 27 Jun 2023, Andi Shyti wrote:
> Tvrtko wrote:
>> I'd simply suggest having a local static const table for the mock device. It
>> should be trivial once i915->__info becomes a pointer so in that series I
>> guess.
That's a great idea, thanks!
> Fei... do you have bandwidth to look into
Hi Jani and Tvrtko,
> > > This patch is a preparation for replacing enum i915_cache_level with PAT
> > > index. Caching policy for buffer objects is set through the PAT index in
> > > PTE, the old i915_cache_level is not sufficient to represent all caching
> > > modes supported by the hardware.
>
On 27/06/2023 14:28, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Tue, 09 May 2023, fei.y...@intel.com wrote:
From: Fei Yang
This patch is a preparation for replacing enum i915_cache_level with PAT
index. Caching policy for buffer objects is set through the PAT index in
PTE, the old i915_cache_level is not
On Tue, 09 May 2023, fei.y...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Fei Yang
>
> This patch is a preparation for replacing enum i915_cache_level with PAT
> index. Caching policy for buffer objects is set through the PAT index in
> PTE, the old i915_cache_level is not sufficient to represent all caching
>
From: Fei Yang
This patch is a preparation for replacing enum i915_cache_level with PAT
index. Caching policy for buffer objects is set through the PAT index in
PTE, the old i915_cache_level is not sufficient to represent all caching
modes supported by the hardware.
Preparing the transition by
