On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 7:11 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> In the 4.11 drm pull request Linus raised a few things that we need to
>> discuss:
>>
>> Late driver/enabling pull requests
>>
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 10:56:49AM -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 7:11 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> I've always tried to have all major new features sent to Dave by rc5,
> so no problems with the timelines. Dave and Linus have generally been
> ok with new asic
On Tue, 07 Mar 2017, Sean Paul wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 01:11:43AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> Linus shitting on dri-devel
>> ---
>>
> IMO, the best approach is to do exactly what danvet did last time:
> praise the contributor for their
On Tue, 07 Mar 2017, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In the 4.11 drm pull request Linus raised a few things that we need to
> discuss:
>
> Late driver/enabling pull requests
> --
>
> Imo this isn't as one-sided as Linus made it sound, we've had
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 7:11 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In the 4.11 drm pull request Linus raised a few things that we need to
> discuss:
>
> Late driver/enabling pull requests
> --
>
> Imo this isn't as one-sided as Linus made it
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 01:11:43AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In the 4.11 drm pull request Linus raised a few things that we need to
> discuss:
>
> Late driver/enabling pull requests
> --
>
> Imo this isn't as one-sided as Linus made it sound,
Hi all,
In the 4.11 drm pull request Linus raised a few things that we need to discuss:
Late driver/enabling pull requests
--
Imo this isn't as one-sided as Linus made it sound, we've had the policy of
pulling new drivers and enabling for new hw very late in the