[Dri-devel] Missing stuff from new DRI website

2001-03-29 Thread Gareth Hughes
Frank, there's still things missing from the new site. Can you please check the old Resources page (at least)? Thanks. -- Gareth ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Re: [Dri-devel] Information request

2001-03-29 Thread Daryll Strauss
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 07:35:14PM +0530, Damarugendra M wrote: I would like to know if I could use DRI to implement an application which obtains HW accleration and runs without using X11. that is i want to run this app from the console. this app may be a game or whatever. it should not

Re: [Dri-devel] Information request

2001-03-29 Thread Joseph Carter
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 07:35:14PM +0530, Damarugendra M wrote: that is i want to run this app from the console. this app may be a game or whatever. it should not be run on X or it should not be linked to any X librarys. It may use OpenGL for graphics. I've got nothing but bad news for you

[Dri-devel] G400 question...

2001-03-29 Thread Adam K Kirchhoff
When using the DRI on my Dualhead G400, I get quite a bit of distortion around the edges of the secondary display. Ben, the Matrox linux support guy, said that this problem is fixed in XFree86 4.0.3, so I gave it a whirl. Lo and behold: no distortion :-) Was there a merge of the two codebases

Re: [Dri-devel] Radeon problem

2001-03-29 Thread Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Joseph Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I spoke too soon, it would seem. 22 March 2001 also dies, it just managed to remain functional overnight. It crashed, hard, as did later. It took the whole box down in the process. Thankfully this box uses reiserfs. It was converted immedately

Re: [Dri-devel] Radeon problem

2001-03-29 Thread Gareth Hughes
Joseph Carter wrote: Radeon support is not even pre-alpha quality right now IMO. =( Mate, that's a pretty strong statement to be making. Yes, you are having problems. Lots of other people aren't (myself included). Let me guess -- you have an AMD chipset? An AMD 750 perhaps? -- Gareth

Re: [Dri-devel] Radeon problem

2001-03-29 Thread Joseph Carter
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 02:20:53PM -0500, Trond Eivind Glomsr?d wrote: Thankfully this box uses reiserfs. It was converted immedately after I ended up with a corrupt filesystem one of the last times X did this to me.. ReiserFS is more prone to fs corruption than ext2. OTOH, you don't

Re: [Dri-devel] Radeon problem

2001-03-29 Thread Gareth Hughes
Joseph Carter wrote: Current speculation is that it might be some issue with agpgart and my Abit KT-7A.. Of course, since it's crashing in 2D, I don't see how that can be the source of the problem. If the DRI is enabled (and I'm guessing that's the whole point, or you wouldn't be posting

Re: [Dri-devel] Radeon problem

2001-03-29 Thread Jeff Hartmann
Joseph Carter wrote: Current speculation is that it might be some issue with agpgart and my Abit KT-7A.. Of course, since it's crashing in 2D, I don't see how that can be the source of the problem. It actually VERY unlikely that agpgart is your problem. VIA support has been pretty solid

[Dri-devel] Re: radeon problems

2001-03-29 Thread Janne Pänkälä
Radeon support is not even pre-alpha quality right now IMO. =( Mate, that's a pretty strong statement to be making. Yes, you are Yep strong indeed. :) I'm also having troubles but nothing this serious. For the most Radeon is working just fine with 2D in my machine (better than in windows

Re: [Dri-devel] Radeon problem

2001-03-29 Thread Jeffrey W. Baker
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Joseph Carter wrote: I'm going to see if there are BIOS updates for it and I may also try the Mesa 3.5 branch. I'm seriously regretting my choice of the Radeon at the moment, that's for sure. With all the

Re: [Dri-devel] Radeon problem

2001-03-29 Thread Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Jeff Hartmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Joseph Carter wrote: On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 01:36:40PM -0700, Jeff Hartmann wrote: I haven't, I'll comment the drm/dri modules out and see how that works. Just to be on the safe side, I will also make sure radeon/agpgart are not loaded in the

Re: [Dri-devel] Radeon problem

2001-03-29 Thread AMD-760MP
Our policy is the following: We only submit kernel changes which will be compatible with the latest XFree86 release to the kernel. When there is a new XFree86 release, there will be updates. This does not include bugfixes which are backwards compatible, which we tend to send more

Re: [Dri-devel] Radeon problem

2001-03-29 Thread Trond Eivind Glomsrød
"AMD-760MP" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Our policy is the following: We only submit kernel changes which will be compatible with the latest XFree86 release to the kernel. When there is a new XFree86 release, there will be updates. This does not include bugfixes which are backwards

[Dri-devel] Re: Radeon problem

2001-03-29 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, AMD-760MP wrote: Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 18:02:03 -0500 From: AMD-760MP [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Trond Eivind Glomsrd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" List-Id: dri-devel.lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: Radeon

Re: [Dri-devel] multiple defs with mesa-3-5-branch GlxBuiltInRadeon

2001-03-29 Thread Keith Whitwell
Greg Hughes wrote: HI, I was attempting to build the mesa-3-5-branch with GlxBuiltInRadeon defined. I got multiply defined symbols in the link phase. Is this known to work/not work on this branch? Is there a better way to build modules that gdb is happy with? It's not a configuration