We broke something in the install script. Don't update using the script
until we include an updated one in new packages (tomorrow I guess).
Also, you will need to download the Extras package if you are updating any
stock XFree86 release (including 4.0.3).
See the readme on the website for more
I know this is a bit off topic (not totally because there's info on the
SiS 540/630 etc chipsets), but I wanted to share this info because I am
sure some of you might have been looking for it like i was ...
I found this site and it had quite a few PDF's that I was unable to get
my hands on
Today, Janne Pänkälä wrote:
From: "John X" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Dri-devel] Radeon SDR provlems fixed (for me at least)
My Radeon SDR is now working perfectly. I haven't yet had a crash or
sonsole corruption (or serious visual glitch) with the radeon-20010418
drivers. uptime is 1 day
Hello,
I've finally make TV out and dualhead work under 2.4.3-ac11 and
matroxfb, my question is if there is any possibility to use the code on
matrox framebuffer dualhead capabilities in XFree86. I know that we have
that propietary libHAL but it is working quite bad for me, for
Hi!
I noticed on flipCode, that ATI has updated their developer docs. Quote
from flipCode: "ATI's developer site has been updated with new
presentations on Vertex Shading, and Curved PN Triangles, as well as
new/updated Radeon SDK docs." The URL is
Ademar,
looking at your pasted info I see:
I'm using:
kernel 2.4.3
SiS 6326 chipset
and
OpenGL vendor string: Brian Paul
OpenGL renderer string: SiS 300/630/530 DR Mode
OpenGL version string: 1.2 Mesa 3.4
As far as I know the Sis 6326 is not the same as the Sis 630. I don't know
this with
I used the ATI Rage Mobility 4P i think it was (4mb chip) with the Utah-
glx drivers and it worked fantastically and faster than ATI's Winblows drivers
thanks to the efforts of Gareth Hughes.
I am not sure if it's supported under the DRI framework at all, but Utah-
glx was good enough for what
On Fri, 20 Apr 2001, Jon Pennington wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 04:43:55PM -0600, Brian Paul wrote:
Pasi Krkkinen wrote:
Hello!
Are there known blending bugs in the mga-driver (g400)? When I render many
additive polygons on the top of each other with small alpha-value
Simon Cahuk wrote:
Hi!
Does DRI work under FreeBSD? Can I compile glide under it (my chip is
banshee)?
It was working at one time, with 3dfx hardware and the G400, I think.
I'm not sure what the status is. I don't think anyone is actively
maintaining FreeBSD support.
I suggest giving it a
Build "XFree86-4" from a very very recent FreeBSD ports tree. It's based
on XFree86-4.0.3 but I believe building of the tdfx and mga kernel modules
is turned on for FreeBSD-4.x. You'll need to get glide-3 up and running
to build and drive Voodoo3/4/5. Another "port" for glide3 for the voodoo3
On Friday 20 April 2001 10:36, Markus Kohls wrote:
I wonder, if there's anyone working on the mach64-driver yet? After Gareth
stopped working on it, there seems to be noone, who is further working on
it. Is the development on the mach64 dead?
No, it's not dead. Right now as I type this, I'm
Frank wrote:
Don't hesitate to send any messages to the mailing lists! If you are
interested in development subscribe to the dri-devel list.
I've forwarded your message to the list.
- Frank
- Original Message -
From: "David Gaarenstroom" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
Buddy Smith wrote:
Hi.
This is a patch i made to add the RADEON VE chipset to the DRI source.
It's available at
http://foobar.resnet.gatech.edu/~nullset/radeon_ve-DRI-patch
I did not post it to the patch list, because i'm not sure if the format is
correct. i generated it using
13 matches
Mail list logo
