[Fwd: [Fwd: [Dri-devel] textures lock system]]

2003-02-08 Thread Chris Ison
Chris Ison wrote: > > Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > > On Sam, 2003-02-08 at 23:17, Chris Ison wrote: > > > > > Does Option "XaaNoScanlineCPUToScreenColorExpandFill" work around it? > > > > um, no ... > > > > > Well, glxgears and the X server do completely different things. You're > > saying it als

[Dri-devel] Re: [Dri-patches] CVS Update: xc (branch: trunk)

2003-02-08 Thread Eric Anholt
On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 17:46, Eric Anholt wrote: > CVSROOT: /cvsroot/dri > Module name: xc > Repository: xc/xc/lib/GL/dri/drm/ > Changes by: anholt@sc8-pr-cvs1. 03/02/08 17:46:32 > > Log message: > Use the right subdirs for NetBSD. > > Modified files: > xc/xc/lib/GL/dri/drm/:

Re: [Dri-devel] [patch] Yet another DMA buffer leak

2003-02-08 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Son, 2003-02-09 at 02:24, Keith Whitwell wrote: > Michel Dänzer wrote: > > On Sam, 2003-02-08 at 18:56, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > > Hmm, moving this to mesa-4-0-4-branch is trickier than I thought. Here's > > a quick'n'dirty merge, but maybe we want to move over more of Keith's > > recent work

Re: [Dri-devel] [patch] Yet another DMA buffer leak

2003-02-08 Thread Keith Whitwell
Michel Dänzer wrote: On Sam, 2003-02-08 at 18:56, Michel Dänzer wrote: On Sam, 2003-02-08 at 18:45, Charl P. Botha wrote: On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 06:24:28PM +0100, Felix Kühling wrote: Found it. DRIVER_RELEASE in radeon.h has to call radeon_reclaim_buffers as the drm_drv.h template seems to

Re: [Fwd: [Dri-devel] textures lock system]

2003-02-08 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Sam, 2003-02-08 at 23:17, Chris Ison wrote: > Chris Ison wrote: > > > > here is the log as requested ... also pcigart is enabled in the source > > ... > > > > as for x11perf, I may have miss understood the option, but its atleast 3 > > *text* ones (after the 3rd I gave up), but the dots and li

[Dri-devel] Re: [patch] Yet another DMA buffer leak

2003-02-08 Thread Mike A. Harris
On 8 Feb 2003, Michel Dänzer wrote: >> > Found it. DRIVER_RELEASE in radeon.h has to call radeon_reclaim_buffers >> > as the drm_drv.h template seems to expect DRIVER_RELEASE to handle this. >> > DRIVER_RELEASE in i810.h does this too. The (1 line) patch is attached. >> >> Thanks for fixing yet a

[Dri-devel] [Are You Saving $1,000's dri-devel?]

2003-02-08 Thread Daria Craghead
Learn To Save $1,000's A Year... Starting Now!Get FOUR Free Quotes & Save 70% Today! Health Life Auto Group Health Home/Renters Save up to 70% on insurance! FREE, no obligation service! Complete easy on-line form in just minutes! Multiple agents and carrier

Re: [Dri-devel] Regression in mga driver compared to 4.2.1

2003-02-08 Thread Arkadi Shishlov
On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 01:31:19AM +0200, Arkadi Shishlov wrote: > It tries to draw a smoke cloud particle effect. Internally it use 64x64 Me bad. It is actually a polygon from explosion cause I had particles turned off at these screenshots. Anyway Alpha channel doesn't work in all places it is us

Re: [Dri-devel] Regression in mga driver compared to 4.2.1

2003-02-08 Thread Arkadi Shishlov
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 02:45:20PM -0800, Ian Romanick wrote: > That's very odd. I don't much, if anything, has changed in the texture > management code in the trunk for that driver in quite some time. Do the > rainbows persist or do they disappear after the dynamic lighting is > gone? I migh

Re: [Fwd: [Dri-devel] textures lock system]

2003-02-08 Thread Chris Ison
> > You say "the system locks." Is it a total-death hard lock? Do you have > another box that could SSH in? It might be intereting to run the app in > gdb to see where it's wedged. > I think it could be an app lock, but as with GL unless the screen is reset, you can't tell just by looking at

Re: [Fwd: [Dri-devel] textures lock system]

2003-02-08 Thread Ian Romanick
Chris Ison wrote: Chris Ison wrote: here is the log as requested ... also pcigart is enabled in the source ... as for x11perf, I may have miss understood the option, but its atleast 3 *text* ones (after the 3rd I gave up), but the dots and lines ones worked. glxgears works fine, so its obvious

Re: [Dri-devel] Regression in mga driver compared to 4.2.1

2003-02-08 Thread Ian Romanick
Arkadi Shishlov wrote: Current mga driver, both from mesa and trunk branches, has a problem which 4.2.1 driver doesn't have. Look at this screenshots (QuakeForge): http://idea.hosting.lv/a/tmp/mga-shots/1.jpg http://idea.hosting.lv/a/tmp/mga-shots/2.jpg http://idea.hosting.lv/a/tmp/mga-shots/3.jp

[Fwd: [Dri-devel] textures lock system]

2003-02-08 Thread Chris Ison
Chris Ison wrote: > > here is the log as requested ... also pcigart is enabled in the source > ... > > as for x11perf, I may have miss understood the option, but its atleast 3 > *text* ones (after the 3rd I gave up), but the dots and lines ones > worked. > > glxgears works fine, so its obviously

[Dri-devel] Regression in mga driver compared to 4.2.1

2003-02-08 Thread Arkadi Shishlov
Current mga driver, both from mesa and trunk branches, has a problem which 4.2.1 driver doesn't have. Look at this screenshots (QuakeForge): http://idea.hosting.lv/a/tmp/mga-shots/1.jpg http://idea.hosting.lv/a/tmp/mga-shots/2.jpg http://idea.hosting.lv/a/tmp/mga-shots/3.jpg This visual artifact

Re: [Dri-devel] [patch] Yet another DMA buffer leak

2003-02-08 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Sam, 2003-02-08 at 18:56, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Sam, 2003-02-08 at 18:45, Charl P. Botha wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 06:24:28PM +0100, Felix Kühling wrote: > > > Found it. DRIVER_RELEASE in radeon.h has to call radeon_reclaim_buffers > > > as the drm_drv.h template seems to expect DRI

Re: [Dri-devel] [patch] Yet another DMA buffer leak

2003-02-08 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Sam, 2003-02-08 at 18:45, Charl P. Botha wrote: > On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 06:24:28PM +0100, Felix Kühling wrote: > > Found it. DRIVER_RELEASE in radeon.h has to call radeon_reclaim_buffers > > as the drm_drv.h template seems to expect DRIVER_RELEASE to handle this. > > DRIVER_RELEASE in i810.h d

Re: [Dri-devel] [patch] Yet another DMA buffer leak

2003-02-08 Thread Charl P. Botha
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 06:24:28PM +0100, Felix Kühling wrote: > Found it. DRIVER_RELEASE in radeon.h has to call radeon_reclaim_buffers > as the drm_drv.h template seems to expect DRIVER_RELEASE to handle this. > DRIVER_RELEASE in i810.h does this too. The (1 line) patch is attached. Thanks for f

Re: [Dri-devel] [patch] Yet another DMA buffer leak

2003-02-08 Thread Felix Kühling
Found it. DRIVER_RELEASE in radeon.h has to call radeon_reclaim_buffers as the drm_drv.h template seems to expect DRIVER_RELEASE to handle this. DRIVER_RELEASE in i810.h does this too. The (1 line) patch is attached. Felix On Sat, 8 Feb 2003 17:49:15 +0100 Felix Kühling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

[Dri-devel] Yet another DMA buffer leak

2003-02-08 Thread Felix Kühling
Hi, There were some seemingly random lockups with with my Radeon 7500. Now I found out that they are actually reproducable. Run for instance the gflux xscreensaver hack repeatedly. Short after starting it the 32nd time X locks up. RADEON_DEBUG_DMA=1 output indicates that this is another DMA buffer

[Dri-devel] Dri-devel, Dr Approved Penis Enlargement!

2003-02-08 Thread drandrews
VP-RX Will Enlarge Your Penis 3+ Inches 100% GUARANTEED TO WORK! Hi, my name is Doctor A J Andrews M.D, We have just recently created the only pill in the world the works on enlarging the male penis. Our tests show that out of the 17,000 Men from around the world who participated in our survey, th

[Dri-devel] issue with DRM_IOCTL_SET_UNIQUE ioctl

2003-02-08 Thread Philip Brown
I would like to request a fundamental change, to a minor part of the DRM API. I believe that the current semantics of ioctl(DRM_IOCTL_SET_UNIQUE) and ioctl(DRM_IOCTL_GET_UNIQUE), violate POSIX/SUS understanding of the ioctl command. To quote from the single unix specification version 2 (1997) htt

Re: [Dri-devel] Rough-rough-rough draft of texmem-0-0-2 designdocument

2003-02-08 Thread Peter Finderup Lund
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Ian Romanick wrote: Attached is the initial rough-draft of the design document for the next generation memory manager. It is currently plain-text. When I polled people on #dri-devel the consensus was that plain-text would be the most useful format. I suspect at some point I

[Dri-devel] decoupling from xfree server code a little

2003-02-08 Thread Philip Brown
I've been poking around the xfree86 server side of dri a bit ... eg: hw/xfree86/drivers/ati/radeon_dri.c and it occurs to me... why is this stuff in the core server? Why isnt it in the dri "module", rather than hacked into the main server? I've scanned through most of it, and it all looks like st