radeon 9800 card still lockup with r300 driver. If you first run
an X server with fglrx, then leave and launch xorg with r300
driver you shouldn't have any lockup.
I am still looking at what fglrx does and i have a couple of
guilty reg but so far after ten thousand reboot dump i haven't
found
On Monday 25 July 2005 10:18, Jerome Glisse wrote:
radeon 9800 card still lockup with r300 driver. If you first run
an X server with fglrx, then leave and launch xorg with r300
driver you shouldn't have any lockup.
I see. Will try that this evening.
I am still looking at what fglrx does and
On 7/25/05, Bellido Nicolas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 25 July 2005 10:18, Jerome Glisse wrote:
radeon 9800 card still lockup with r300 driver. If you first run
an X server with fglrx, then leave and launch xorg with r300
driver you shouldn't have any lockup.
I see. Will try that
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3862
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-25 20:49 ---
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3862
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-25 20:51 ---
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3862
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-25 20:55 ---
I've
On Monday 25 July 2005 11:33, Jerome Glisse wrote:
If anyone have a better procedure to track differences btw radeon/r300 2d
driver from xorg and fglrx (2d driver) ?
I'm not used at all to work on x86 processors, nor am I with PCI or AGP, so
what follows may be complete nonsense...
Isn't it
On 7/25/05, Bellido Nicolas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 25 July 2005 11:33, Jerome Glisse wrote:
If anyone have a better procedure to track differences btw radeon/r300 2d
driver from xorg and fglrx (2d driver) ?
I'm not used at all to work on x86 processors, nor am I with PCI or
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 08:59:53 +0200
Bellido Nicolas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 25 July 2005 00:47, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
Bellido Nicolas wrote:
When the radeon module is loaded, i get in the kernel logs:
Linux agpgart interface v0.101 (c) Dave Jones
agpgart: Detected VIA
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3868
Summary: DRI drivers should export all supported fbconfigs
On Monday 25 July 2005 10:18, Jerome Glisse wrote:
radeon 9800 card still lockup with r300 driver. If you first run
an X server with fglrx, then leave and launch xorg with r300
driver you shouldn't have any lockup.
A quick question: which version of X and fglrx are you using ?
I've been
- Original Message -
From: Alex Deucher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sunday, July 24, 2005 5:49 pm
Subject: Re: X300SE PCI-E freezes
On 7/24/05, Torbjörn Söderstedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I tried the driver on my X300SE PCI-E card, but when I start the X
server all I get is
On 7/25/05, Bellido Nicolas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 25 July 2005 10:18, Jerome Glisse wrote:
radeon 9800 card still lockup with r300 driver. If you first run
an X server with fglrx, then leave and launch xorg with r300
driver you shouldn't have any lockup.
A quick question:
Jerome Glisse wrote:
On 7/25/05, Bellido Nicolas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 25 July 2005 10:18, Jerome Glisse wrote:
radeon 9800 card still lockup with r300 driver. If you first run
an X server with fglrx, then leave and launch xorg with r300
driver you shouldn't have any lockup.
A
Hey,
I just installed the card mentioned in the subject line hoping to be
able to get better performance with OpenCroquet than I could with my R128...
I open it up and it crashes and locks the screen...
Using a second computer to de-lock the console, I was able to recover
this message from GDB:
Hello,
I am trying to get the r300 driver to work for my radeon 9600 on a
1GHz Powerbook G4. I am running Xorg 6.8.99.15 on a 2.6.11 kernel
(Gentoo).
I followed the instructions and checked out the r300_driver from the
CVS as well as the latest Mesa CVS, compiled the whole thing and
installed
begin Sebastien Cevey quotation of Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 02:17:37AM +0200:
Me again..
I get an error in glxinfo telling me that the r300_dri driver could
not be loaded:
Well I just saw the post saying that the r300 CVS is moved to the Mesa
one, so I guess I tested a slightly outdated version.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sebastien Cevey wrote:
Well I just saw the post saying that the r300 CVS is moved to the Mesa
one, so I guess I tested a slightly outdated version. I tried the
version in the Mesa CVS now (and renamed the
__driCreateNewScreen_20050722 function
There are still some uses of this in the DRI tree...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mesa-cg]$ grep -r DRI_NEW_INTERFACE_ONLY *
configs/freebsd-dri:DEFINES = -DDRI_NEW_INTERFACE_ONLY -DPTHREADS
-DUSE_EXTERNAL_DXTN_LIB=1
configs/linux-solo: -DDRI_NEW_INTERFACE_ONLY -DPTHREADS
-DUSE_EXTERNAL_DXTN_LIB=1
/**
* \name Functions provided by the driver loader.
*/
/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
extern __DRIscreen *__glXFindDRIScreen(__DRInativeDisplay *dpy, int scrn);
--
Jon Smirl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux
20 matches
Mail list logo
