[Bug 16614] [i965 mesa_7_0_branch] SpecViewPerf 10/ tcvis-01 sometime segment fault

2008-07-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16614 Shuang He <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED --- Comment #

Re: cursor handling and updates inside DRM

2008-07-10 Thread Simon Thum
Tiago Vignatti wrote: > Daniel Stone escreveu: >> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 04:05:57AM -0300, Tiago Vignatti wrote: >>> - transform relative motion into absolute >>> - takes care the cursor limits >>> - responsible for the acceleration computation >>> - responsible for the input transformation as wel

[Bug 16670] Mesa 7.0.3rc2 crashes with i915 driver error (" exceeded max nr indirect texture lookups")

2008-07-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16670 haihao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 16670] New: Mesa 7.0.3rc2 crashes with i915 driver error (" exceeded max nr indirect texture lookups")

2008-07-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16670 Summary: Mesa 7.0.3rc2 crashes with i915 driver error ("exceeded max nr indirect texture lookups") Product: Mesa Version: 7.0.3 Platform: x86 (IA32) OS/Version: All

Re: cursor handling and updates inside DRM

2008-07-10 Thread Dave Airlie
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Jesse Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday, July 10, 2008 3:59 pm Tiago Vignatti wrote: >> Simon Thum escreveu: >> > But all this in the kernel is an impedance mismatch to me. What could it >> > buy us we don't have today? >> >> Improve heavy-load behavio

Re: cursor handling and updates inside DRM

2008-07-10 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Thursday, July 10, 2008 3:59 pm Tiago Vignatti wrote: > Simon Thum escreveu: > > But all this in the kernel is an impedance mismatch to me. What could it > > buy us we don't have today? > > Improve heavy-load behavior -- no jumping pointer. > > (BTW, your mouse acceleration proposal [0] doesn't

[Bug 15728] [945GM][kernel 2.6.25] Fail to run GL program after resume

2008-07-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15728 Jie Luo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

Re: cursor handling and updates inside DRM

2008-07-10 Thread Stephane Marchesin
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 1:12 AM, Tiago Vignatti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Jakob, > > Jakob Bornecrantz escreveu: >> The only thing that should be in the kernel is the: >> - touch the gfx registers. >> and in some regards >> - takes care of the cursor limits. >> >> Anything else is the cli

Re: cursor handling and updates inside DRM

2008-07-10 Thread Tiago Vignatti
Hi Jakob, Jakob Bornecrantz escreveu: > The only thing that should be in the kernel is the: > - touch the gfx registers. > and in some regards > - takes care of the cursor limits. > > Anything else is the client responsibility. The coordinates that we > feed the kernel will be relative to the

Re: cursor handling and updates inside DRM

2008-07-10 Thread Tiago Vignatti
Simon Thum escreveu: > But all this in the kernel is an impedance mismatch to me. What could it > buy us we don't have today? Improve heavy-load behavior -- no jumping pointer. (BTW, your mouse acceleration proposal [0] doesn't do it at all.) Cheers, [0] https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachmen

Re: Gallium HW winsys

2008-07-10 Thread Younes Manton
[Just realized that mesa-dev might be slightly more on topic for DRI-specific issues. See below. Thanks.] On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Younes Manton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm trying to get the HW winsys stuff set up for XvMC and have some questions. > > Is there any problem with dlopen

Gallium HW winsys

2008-07-10 Thread Younes Manton
I'm trying to get the HW winsys stuff set up for XvMC and have some questions. Is there any problem with dlopen()ing the DRI driver (in this case nouveau_dri.so) and instead of writing my own winsys? Stephane suggested I look into this, even though the winsys is supposed to be tied to the API. For

Re: cursor handling and updates inside DRM

2008-07-10 Thread Jakob Bornecrantz
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Tiago Vignatti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Daniel Stone escreveu: > > On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 04:05:57AM -0300, Tiago Vignatti wrote: > >> - transform relative motion into absolute > >> - takes care the cursor limits > >> - responsible for the acceleration computa

Re: cursor handling and updates inside DRM

2008-07-10 Thread Tiago Vignatti
Daniel Stone escreveu: > On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 04:05:57AM -0300, Tiago Vignatti wrote: >> - transform relative motion into absolute >> - takes care the cursor limits >> - responsible for the acceleration computation >> - responsible for the input transformation as well? >> - touch the gfx registe

Re: cursor handling and updates inside DRM

2008-07-10 Thread Daniel Stone
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 04:05:57AM -0300, Tiago Vignatti wrote: > - transform relative motion into absolute > - takes care the cursor limits > - responsible for the acceleration computation > - responsible for the input transformation as well? > - touch the gfx registers. Hang on, are we actually

[Bug 16157] [i965] glean/glsl1 run abort

2008-07-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16157 Gordon Jin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]

cursor handling and updates inside DRM

2008-07-10 Thread Tiago Vignatti
Hi, The current DRM kernel modesetting tree is already taking care to update the cursor registers and paint it to the screen. Very cool [0]. What I've done today is a shortcut between the kernel input layer and DRM to update the cursor directly on screen without the X server be notified always